UNLV's new logo

>they literally have to explain everything about the logo, including the location of the actual face, because its too ambiguous in the logo itself
>the people who donated money for this

>500 THOUSAND DOLLARS
>1 year

this is why graphic design is a scam

File: 1492220040989.jpg (64KB, 637x637px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 637x637px

that boi ain't right

>>76827711
nvm it's 50k

but that's still a shitton of money for a logo

>>76827677
It'll grow on people I feel but initial thought was it is dumb
Still prefer the old logo

>muh symbolism

The mountains don't even look like mountains

File: wilbon.png (413KB, 368x478px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 368x478px

>>76827677
Millennials today take on over 100+k in student debt to go to school for this kind of "Design Expertise"

good luck with your future, you tiny little kids

The old one was pretty bad too tbqh.

new: 5.5/10
old: 4.8/10

>>76827677

what a fucking mess

what the HECK

>>76827718
>but that's still a shitton of money for a logo
not really when the school will profit in the millions of dollars every year selling it on merchandise

I like how the new one is so poorly made that they need to dissect it and draw lines to things so we know what each feature is

>>76827677
I actually like it

>>76828142
>not really when the school will profit in the millions of dollars every year selling it on merchandise
this was also true of the old logo on merchandise

>>76828533
ok. The point isn't arguing old vs new,. it should be obvious but spending a small amount on something like this is fine with the spenders. You get people making 100k just to design a basic hashtag for Notre Dame. it's crazy but it's how shit goes