The GOAT

>>76655126
wilt

I miss the Sonics uniforms desu senpai

>>76655126
curry spamming 3's

>>76655126
The skyhook is below average efficience wise. Any modern player would murder Kareem

>>76655677
Explain. Cuz it sounds as if you just pulled that out of your ass.
Also: What's efficiency got to do with anything.?

File: 00.png (243KB, 461x349px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 461x349px

Bill Walton was better than Jabbar.

Christ, even 6'9" Dave Cowens handled him during his prime. Was a big controversy during the 1974 Finals when the Celtics didn't even double team him

File: 1493639388266.gif (1018KB, 300x167px) Image search: [Google]

1018KB, 300x167px

>>76655677

Delusional. It's not a coincidence that the two greatest single-season turn arounds in league history came with players who went to 4 years of college (Duncan and Bird).

Today you have 18 year olds playing against 19 year olds. Players never learn to dominate even college kids - they are so limited in their skills it's not even funny.

It's a league of Dominique Wilkins's and World B. Free's and you think it's quality. Shut up dumb fuck.

>>76655246
This. I think Wilt is the only player to ever block his sky hook. Guy was a freak.

>>76655677
>tf
>tp
There's nothing "inefficient" about a near guaranteed 2 points

>>76655728
>Explain
The skyhook had a 55% chance of transforming into 2 points.That is close a 40% chance to score a 3.Layups and dunks are at 70% and 90% respectively, which means that any athletic player that can get a layup or a dunk is going to outscore someone that uses mostly the skyhook.Curry spaming 3's would also outscore Kareem unironically

>>76655771
>There's nothing "inefficient" about a near guaranteed 2 points
It was as efficient as most a midrange shot

>angry spanish statsfag
carry on