Is tottenham considered a big club in england? Or just medium tier?

Medium tier

>>76468589
They're a "big club" in a relative sense, there are hundreds of clubs in England and Tottenham are in the top 10 in terms of trophies/fanbase/etc.. But they're not a big club in the way most people talk about it, in England the only big clubs are Man United, Liverpool, and Arsenal.

medium+ recently turned big tier

>a fucking cock

>>76468589
Everton tier

>>76468675
Is everton big?
Is aston villa big?

>>76468693
Everton are still big imo, they were fantastic in the 80s and still have a lot of fans even if they're worthless now

File: inbruges_large.jpg (16KB, 383x224px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 383x224px

>like Tottenham?

>>76468773
yes

They're a hard club to categorise, they're relevant but haven't won anything major since the 60's. They're big but not in the same bracket at your Man Utd's Liverpool's Chelsea's and Arsenal's but above teams like Everton, West Ham, Man City and Newcastle.

>>76468633

>big club
>no CL trophy

take ar6nil out of the english "big clubs" list

>thread where a hue asks about british football
>somehow americans feel entitled to express their opinion
Fuck off.

>>76469272
Suck it, bitchboi

>>76468917
You weren't shit, but you weren't all that great. Like Tottenham

yes they are big

>>76471853
For you

File: Didier_Drogba_Champions_League_Winner.jpg (573KB, 944x1200px) Image search: [Google]

573KB, 944x1200px

>>76468633
Chelsea is a bigger clun than both Liverpool and Arsenal...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2017/06/06/the-worlds-most-valuable-soccer-teams-2017/#158d5f7f77ea

>>76468589
lads its >tottenham

File: chelski.jpg (108KB, 617x188px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 617x188px

>>76472018
That's what millenial customers actually believe

>>76472018
>https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2017/06/06/the-worlds-most-valuable-soccer-teams-2017/#158d5f7f77ea

yeah and AC Milan too, right?

>>76472108
I don't know if you're joking, but Milan /are/ a bigger club. They've won 7 Champions Leagues. That's the same amount of finals Juventus have lost.

>>76472018
>Chelsea is a bigger clun than both Liverpool and Arsenal...

Can't even tell if this bait or not...but Liverpool have 5 CLs and 18 league titles. It will take Chelsea 20 years to come even close to them.

Tottenham is huge

>>76472210
So by "big" you just mean how many trophies the club has historically won. Not the actual worth of the club as of today? Lmaooo.

The fact of the matter is, is that if you wanted to buy Chelsea or Liverpool, Chelsea would cost more.

>>76472435
You're retarded. By that logic £900m of crude oil are a bigger club than spuds.

File: large_cfc_we-1458572141.png (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>76468633
You seem to be missing a team there, friend.

File: nba premier league.png (666KB, 844x697px) Image search: [Google]

666KB, 844x697px

>>76468589


Elite club:

Man United / liverpool

Big clubs:

Tier 1:

Arsenal

Tier 2:

Aston Villa / Everton

Tier 3:

Spurs / Chelsea

Tier 4:

Man City / Newcastle / Leeds

>>76472767
City had as many first division wins as spuds before they even got taken over

idk

>>76472739

>this team quit on mou
>this team won a championship for antonio

;_;

>>76472767
>no Nottingham Forest

File: IMG_3274.png (118KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 640x1136px

>>76468589
Medium, look at they're trophy cabinet mate.

>>76476361
And they still think they are "rivals" with arsenal in anything but location. They're like a championship tier side compared to arsenal

>>76472767
That picture makes me sick

>>76475484
They are in a shit tier all of their own

>>76472767
Liverpool needs more >>96

>>76476380
Hasn't that rivalry always been about location though? Arsenal came from Woolwich then bribed their way into the first division, isn't that why Spurs fans hate them and see them as rivals?

Not at all, the biggest clubs are Chelsea / Man Utd
After them you have 'big' clubs from either history or potential, being Liverpool and City
Finally, you have the chokers, the medium clubs whose fans would love to say that they're big when it just isn't the case, being Arsenal and Tottenham

There aren't any other big clubs, I don't give a fuck about who was winning trophies 40 years ago if they're not winning now

>>76472767
as an avid follower of both the premier league aswell as the nba the comparison of these is so off it hurts. the only one that might be correct is man city and the clippers.

medium

>>76475484
Forest were relevent for 3 years. Most foreigners probably don't know why they are.
They didn't capitalise on their PL stint and thus are now irrelevent.

Leicester and Derby have been more prevalent in the last 20 years.

>>76468589

Tottenham were the biggest London club from WW2 up until the late 1980s