Pick any two players in existence to surround with literal D-leaguers and a peewee coach, and no other duo gives you a better chance to win a championship than LeBron + Jordan.
Trying to say which is better is stupid because their skills are really complimentary of one another. They each have what the other one needs.
>>76434189
LBJ is a nice pair with Jordan insofar as he likes to pass and prefers to shy away when the light's too bright.
>>76434189
Prime Allen Iverson and literally any other decent allstar. Looking back at his 2001 76ers team it was basically him with D-leaguers anyways.
LBJ+MJ+3 Literal Whos
vs
Magic+Bird+3 Literal Whos
Who wins?
I'd take prime Shaq and Magic to destroy Jordan and LeBeta, a random D-Leaguer would have no chance stopping Shaq in the post, he'd score 80 dunks a game.
Just have Magic dribble up and pass to Shaq in the post for easy buckets all day.
What does Lebron have that Jordan needs? In a career shorter than Lebron's will be, he accomplished more.
>>76434268
Allen Iverson was just a much less consistent Jordan. They could both have nights where they could carry an entire team on their backs, but Jordan could do it more often.
>>76434370
Jordan could never even get out of the first round without Pippin, and LeBron is Pippin on steroids. You also don't need Phil Jackson so much if you have LeBron.
>there are people who STILL think LeBron is good
>>76434338
LeBron and Jordan both played in harder eras than Shaq and Magic.
The early 2000s Lakers especially never had to challenge any great teams.
>>76434583
>who are the spurs
The 90's are THE weakest era since the 60's