Thread replies: 431
Thread images: 72
Thread images: 72
File: 1493269041050.png (325KB, 785x757px) Image search:
[Google]
325KB, 785x757px
OILERS DUCKS GAME 2
OILERS AHEAD 2-1 IN GAME AND 1-0 IN SERIES
>>
THEY'RE BLOWIN IT
>>
easy game for the ducks lad
>>
File: 1488768859369.jpg (322KB, 864x864px) Image search:
[Google]
322KB, 864x864px
>>75575075
>>75575075
>>
>>75575075
xth for cucks come back
>>
What's the best or easiest way for an American to live in Canada? Landing a job?
>>
who here /sweden/?
>>
Ducks can't even score without the refs being bought off.
>>
>>75575110
Fuck off, we're full
>"draw an outline around the sign" captcha
for fuck sake
>>
Jesus Christ people learn to control your sticks.
>>
>>75575110
get a canadian boyfriend
>>
Anaheim are a bunch of dirty FUCKS
>>
Time to score again
>>
>refs debating if they should call it
KEK not even hiding it
>>
>>75575110
This . I want to know how to legally immigrate me and my gf to Canada . We both hate are crypto fascist fraud president Drumpf
What's the best way for me and my gf to start a new life in canada ? I have a degree in history
>>
Just went on wikipedia to check to see where Maroon went to high school since he from st louis. The article talked about high school hockey in the area, but referenced, without naming me, that I was paralyzed in a hockey game.
Have I been secretly paralyzed this whole time?
>>
Christ Edmonton seriously needs to regroup
>>
fire jay woodcroft when? oilers pp will never be good with him
>>
>>75575145
define "gf"
>>
>>75575149
You're in a coma. PLEASE WAKE UP
>>
I fucking hate shitmonton
>>
>>75575134
They were trying to decide if it was going to be 2 or 4 retarded Canuck.
>>
>>75575110
i would also like to know how to move to canada and get a cute canadian gf
please reply
>>
>>75575145
We already have enough leftist cucks here, see post above.
>>75575127
>Fuck off, we're full
>>
>>75575157
I would have prefered this pp to carry over into the next period. They just need to get out of this period. The 3rd has been good for them so far this playoffs.
>>
>>75575162
her name is jamal with a big black dick
>>
>>75575145
We have enough liberals with useless degrees in this country. If you do end up shitting up this place with your presence make sure you stay in Ontario.
>>
>>75575174
>Cute girls
>Canada
I have bad news for you
>>
>>75575174
This . I want a cute Canadian gf who loves hockey like me . Getting sick of SoCal desu
>>
>>75575161
Vintage meme from October
>>
>>75575189
Don't lie.
>>
File: cef9d-1stpic.jpg (88KB, 650x440px) Image search:
[Google]
88KB, 650x440px
>>75575189
what is montreal
>>
File: csm01000.jpg (16KB, 218x236px) Image search:
[Google]
16KB, 218x236px
>>75575145
>We both hate are crypto fascist fraud president Drumpf
ZBOOORRRRFFF!!!
>>
>>75575195
Where in SoCal you live?
>>
File: bait another dimension.jpg (13KB, 282x300px) Image search:
[Google]
13KB, 282x300px
>>75575195
>Getting sick of SoCal
can we make the bait just a little less obvious? it will keep the thread more interesting
>>
>>75575180
I was thinking of moving more to BC area or newfoundlands
>>
>>75575202
he was shit in san jose, hes shit in edmonton
its not a meme anymore
>>
>>75575221
this meme was a lot funnier with john oliver
colbert's face isn't as humorous
>>
>>75575217
French canadian girls are even more repulsive than the rest of canada
>>
>>75575189
As long as he stays away the French ones he should be ok.
>>
>>75575204
I'm not
>>75575217
Alright I forgot about Quebec but Quebec is only one small part of Canada
>>
>>75575145
Blompf just admitted that the presidency was harder then he thought. He's gonna quit or get impeached soon enough.
>>
>>75575145
>what are your marketable skills?
>I know stuff about history
>>
>>75575237
Your lying to hoard all the cute canadian gf's stop lying
>>
>>75575239
Shut up borat
>>
>>75575248
Teach history
>>
How much does a ferry cost to get from New Brunswick to Nova Scotia? I wanna one of these days go to Nova Scotia
>>
File: pic3120742.jpg (181KB, 620x412px) Image search:
[Google]
181KB, 620x412px
>>75575232
>>
>>75575255
Mate I'm telling you the broads are subpar
I've been to the states, you guys have way more qts than us
>>
>>75575259
Yep, that's pretty much it
>>
>>75575248
become a freelance writer
work at a museum
there's options
>>
File: B5jeouWCEAAHT3g.jpg (62KB, 600x600px) Image search:
[Google]
62KB, 600x600px
>>75575239
He's a weak faggot Mr. Golovkin
>>
Already past my bedtime lads.
>>
File: mad at confetti.png (119KB, 900x900px) Image search:
[Google]
119KB, 900x900px
hei
>>
>>75575278
yeah but none of them are pure
>>
File: 4LwI1YF.jpg (185KB, 1200x1021px) Image search:
[Google]
185KB, 1200x1021px
>>75575248
give blowies behind a bowling alley
>>
What Canadian city has the worst drivers?
>>
File: 1493319573896.jpg (27KB, 319x389px) Image search:
[Google]
27KB, 319x389px
>>75575229
IT WAS MY MEME!!
MY MEME!!
>>
>the Cucks sweep the Lames
>get swept by Edmonton
TOP.
FUCKING.
K E K
K E K
K E K
>>
File: Prepeared_to_die.png (195KB, 500x484px) Image search:
[Google]
195KB, 500x484px
Tfw my 7 year old nephew is watching his first hockey game and it's this shit show
>>
>>75575145
>we both hate are crypto fascist fraud president Drumpf
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (84KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
84KB, 1280x720px
>>75575318
Chink City
>>
>>75575320
Nope weve seen this episode before. Ducks will lose this game, go on a 3 game streak to get up 3-2, then lose 6 and 7
>>
>pongs
>>
>>75575278
Depends. Younger girls are qt but ive yet to meet a girl my age I genuinly thought was cute. Tbf prolly cause I work at nights and don't go out ever
>>
>>75575339
me on the right
>>
Oh god, why have mercy, not a fucking sweep, have mercy, please god, not to fucking canadian teams, please have fucking mercy.
>>
>>75575322
man, i feel sorry for the lad
you have to shoot him in the head now
>>
How do the Cucks get playoffs every year then fuck up?
>>
What Is the confetti meme?
>>
File: 1461731452048.jpg (24KB, 430x340px) Image search:
[Google]
24KB, 430x340px
>>75575343
>>
File: 1492403218321.png (328KB, 721x717px) Image search:
[Google]
328KB, 721x717px
>>75575356
>>
>>75575355
Same as caps desu
>>
>>75575145
We have enough leftist scum already.
Americans get out REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>
Ỏ̷͖͈̞̩͎̻̫̫̜͉̠̫͕̭̭̫̫̹̗̹͈̼̠̖͍͚̥͈̮̼͕̠̤̯̻̥̬̗̼̳̤̳̬̪̹͚̞̼̠͕̼̠̦͚̫͔̯̹͉͉̘͎͕̼̣̝͙̱̟̹̩̟̳̦̭͉̮̖̭̣̣̞̙̗̜̺̭̻̥͚͙̝̦̱͉͖͉̰̦͎̫̣̼͎͍̠̮͓̹̹͉̤̰̗̙͕͇͔̱͕̭͈̳̗̭͔̘̖̺̮̜̠͖̘͓̳͕̟̠̱̫̤͓͔̘̰͙͍͇̙͎̣̼̗̖͙̯͉̠̟͈͍͕̪͓̝̩̦̖̹̼̠̘̮͚̟͉̺̜͍͓̯̳̱̻͕̣̳͉̻̭̭̱͍̪̩̭̺͕̺̼̥̪͖̦̟͎̻̰h my god, when the FUCK are the Ducks gonna tie this fucking game?
>>
File: fascinating.jpg (35KB, 500x354px) Image search:
[Google]
35KB, 500x354px
>>75575145
>we both hate are
>hate are
>Are
>i have a degree in history
>degree in history
>HISTORY DEGREE
can the "trump supporters ARE illiterate and contribute nothing to society" meme end now? can this post be the catalyst of proving the opposite is true?
>>
Imagine mcdavid standing next to drumpf with the cup.
>>
File: Wayne_Simmonds_Philadelphia_Flyers_v_New_Jersey_shGwciKhLHBl.jpg (55KB, 500x360px) Image search:
[Google]
55KB, 500x360px
>>75575357
pitt fan from alaska
>>
>>75575145
Posting nudes of your GF is the first step.
Then we'll let you know.
>>
>>75575388
Why would the oilers come to the whitehouse? They have no american connection
>>
>>75575375
HE
COMES.
ZALGO.
>>
>>75575375
30 seconds into the third
>checkem
>>
>>75575388
Why would Trump be there kek
>>
>>75575379
>can the "trump supporters ARE illiterate and contribute nothing to society" meme end now?
No, you're still a bunch of easily manipulated morons.
>>
>>75575400
They play in the National Hockey League (USA)
>>
>>75575318
The one with the most asians, obviously.
>>
>>75575415
Oh the iron knee
>>
>>75575415
This . Drumpf supporters vote against their own economic interests
>>
Last digit is the number of goals the ducks score in the 3rd
>>
>>75575421
Canada founded the NHL
>>
the only thing the left is good for is being helicopter bait
>>
>>75575456
But it is indeed an american league
>>
>>75575421
A Canadian team would take the cup to parliament hill and stand with the Prime Minister.
>>
File: 1480463488820.png (173KB, 293x290px) Image search:
[Google]
173KB, 293x290px
>>75575415
>it's the "Trumpkins Not Wearing The Biggest Fedora" episode
skip to the tits
um, I meant impeachment
>>
>>75575435
>because having the government redistribute my income to niggers and lazy faggots is in my economic interest
>>
>>75575448
Last digit is the number of games in the series the oilers win
>>
File: 1488762711914.gif (29KB, 200x260px) Image search:
[Google]
29KB, 200x260px
>this game is so shit that we're talking about politics
>>
>>75575467
>>75575448
These two dont agree
>>
>>75575467
7 GAME SWEEP!
>>
>>75575431
>b b but he SAID it would TRICKLE DOWN,!!
How's the draintheswamp/lockherup/buildthewall going?
>>
File: 20151221_194540_resized_1.jpg (1MB, 2656x1494px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 2656x1494px
>>75575392
shadyside senpai :^)
>>
>>75575476
more like
>were all so autistic one shit post can derail a thread
>>
Mcgaykid lol
>>
>>75575467
SWEEP CONFIRMED
LGTSS
>cucks
>>
>>75575461
>all Canadian players
Doesn't seem like it is desu
>>
>>75575456
Headcourters in Jewyork
>>
>>75575467
oh snap this thread JUST GOT INTERESTING
>>
File: 1493330760693.png (422KB, 750x501px) Image search:
[Google]
422KB, 750x501px
>>75575415
>easily manipulated
Democrats were more easily manipulated.
I mean bernie and hillary? Seriously?
>>
>>75575503
Where is pulju
>>
>>75575506
Wrong again. HQ is in Toronto.
>>
CanucksWILLWinTheDraftLottery (ID: !!DixbxHHKXUr)
2017-04-29 04:43:33
Post No.75575524
[Report] Image search: [Google]
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 1493410923240.png (1MB, 1080x982px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1080x982px
SOMEONE FUCKING SCORE AHHHHHHHHHH
>>
>>75575476
It was intermission. But yeah, it is kinda lame
>>
>>75575464
> muh niggers
Exactly why you are so easily manipulated to vote against your interests
>>
>>75575530
Not an argument
>>
>>75575435
>Drumpf supporters vote against their own economic interests
How exactly?
Voting for bernie or hillary would also vote against their interests.
>>75575530
>PLEASE TAKE MY MONEY AND MONOPOLIZE INDUSTRY GOVERNMENT
You people are so brainwashed it's unreal.
>>
File: bern, the high cuck grand vizier.jpg (112KB, 825x631px) Image search:
[Google]
112KB, 825x631px
>>75575516
>>
>>75575522
NVM, must have changed recently.
>>
/pol/ please go.
>>
File: 1484716819681.png (924KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
924KB, 1920x1080px
>tfw to intelligent for politics
>>
>>75575524
kill yourself kippers
>>
Ducks gonna dab all over you
>>
>>75575542
A FUCKING LEAF
>>
>>75575540
>PLEASE TAKE MY MONEY AND MONOPOLIZE INDUSTRY GOVERNMENT
Unless they're making well into the six figures (heh), they wouldn't have seen a change in their taxes. Stop posting, you don't know what you're talking about.
>>
File: 12546339754.png (82KB, 303x159px) Image search:
[Google]
82KB, 303x159px
>>75575559
Does dab have something to do with Golf?
>>
>>75575524
More like REEEEE action
>>
File: 1453233443588.jpg (938KB, 1520x2688px) Image search:
[Google]
938KB, 1520x2688px
>>75575496
>>
>>75575550
tfw too intelligent to be racist
>>
>>75575550
Looks comfy
>>
File: download.png (9KB, 293x172px) Image search:
[Google]
9KB, 293x172px
>>75575568
>they wouldn't have seen a change in their taxes.
Yes.
Bernie's tax plan would have dramatically raised taxes on the middle class. Stop lying.
>>
>>75575516
Your candidate is Donald Trump
your move
>>
>>75575574
Lel okay oilkid. The big guys are taking over soon. Just wait dor your diaper change
>>
>>75575487
gawd I regret my vote honestly and im not just trolling
>america first!
lets fuck with NK!
>>
>>75575550
damn i really, really like that picture. mind if i save it?
>>
>>75575597
This banter is fucking toilet tier. Stop.
>>
Are the oilers even playing any more??
>>
>>75575591
Kek. You obviously don't know what "middle class" means. Seriously, stop posting.
>>
>>75575604
all yours my friend!
thanks for joining us
>>
Holy shit this thread is utter shit now. Glad the game is good.
>>
>>75575620
Nope they're turtling hard
>>
>>75575620
Do the haka
>>
Fuck edmonton
>>
>>75575620
Don't worry, they'll get one good chance and score. Or get a PPG.
>>
File: 1469167143482.jpg (33KB, 480x456px) Image search:
[Google]
33KB, 480x456px
>>75575628
I'm sorry, I'm finished
>>
A-Are the Oilers going to the WCF?
>>
>>75575638
FUCK CANADA
>>
>>75575620
Oh look it's the loser from New Zealand who has nothing better to do than shit-talk Edmonton all day. Must be an exciting life.
>>
>>75575506
Canada is the headquarters for the sport of hockey.
>>
>>75575622
Are you legit retarded?
Literally the poor and middle class would have benefited far more in terms of taxes.
I just showed you the evidence.
Where is your argument?
Fucking bootlickers.
>>
>>75575651
I think so. Then they can get demolished by Crysby and the Pengoons.
>>
File: 1462326658516.jpg (72KB, 604x604px) Image search:
[Google]
72KB, 604x604px
>>75575651
Yes
deal with it
>>
>
>game
>
>
>game
>>
>>75575651
Imagine Cowtown's reaction if they go all the way lel
>>
>>75575666
Satan please no
>>
>>75575631
only if you teach me how to play hockey
>tfw your country is ranked 37th over all and the last time we went up a division we lost 21-1
>>
>>75575672
only city in canada that wouldn't be celebrating
>>
>>75575666
Thanks Satan
>>
Anyone paying attention to the WHL game?
>>
>>75575651
>WCF
Stanley starts with an S though.
>>
File: 1478249743191.jpg (201KB, 470x595px) Image search:
[Google]
201KB, 470x595px
>>75575666
>>
>>75575686
Not since Bear broke his hand
>>
>>75575672
>Oilers sweep the Ducks
Holy shit Calgary would be eternally bootyblasted
>>
>>75575592
He was better than both of them though.
Honestly though I would have voted for Hillary just so the coming economic collapse happens under her instead of him. Oh well.
>>
>>75575686
honestly if you're in it for memes I'm starting to think watching women's sports might actually be more fun
probably less ref-(ball/puck) too
>>
>>75575339
i thought egoraptor was married?
>>
Ducks have been the better team. Really deserve to win
>>
>>75575580
but you're not intelligent
Racial differences in IQ and aggression have already been established scientific fact.
You're a creationist
>>
>>75575700
I meant Western Hockey League.
>>
>>75575707
This theyre getting fucked hard
>>
>>75575700
sorry thought WHL stood for "woman" or something
i haven't watched this game since the start honestly
>>
File: pancakes.png (100KB, 181x202px) Image search:
[Google]
100KB, 181x202px
>>75575707
Last I checked, the better team is the one that scores more goals.
>>
>>75575664
You made a statement (Bernie would have raised taxes on the middle class) that your little chart proved wrong. Honestly, I don't even know what you're talking about.
>>
>>75575695
he's fucking sociopath
and you're a goon for thinking he's better than anyone
>>
File: 1464183983787s.jpg (7KB, 250x241px) Image search:
[Google]
7KB, 250x241px
>>75575707
>deserve to win
>>
>>75575651
lmao no. preds will destroy them
>>
>>75575711
i'm not a creationist
i'm jewish
>>
>>75575707
Fucking reddit. get off my /sp/
>>
ducks are going to score soon but edmonton is going to win in overtime
screencap this post
>>
kek @ Getzlaf's "FUCK" closeup moment
>>
>oilers fans louder than the home team
Beautiful.
>>
>>75575725
Preds actually unirocnially lost to the bloos once
>>
>>75575736
pls no it's already so late.
>>
>>75575736
Nah this feels like game 1 against SJ
>>
>>75575742
>he's never heard of the tactical loss
>>
>>75575736
no need to screen cap. check this dubs
>>
>teams have to injure our goalie to win
>roloson
>now talbot
fuck off
>>
>>75575375
Fuck off zalgo
>>
>This quiet ass arena
Lel
>>
>>75575756
>off by 1
Just like the oilers. Ducks OT win confirmed
>>
File: 1490676813406.jpg (9KB, 256x192px) Image search:
[Google]
9KB, 256x192px
>>75575751
No
Fuck you
>>
>>75575756
Fag can't even dubs
>>
File: laughing white upper-middle class individuals.png (199KB, 311x282px) Image search:
[Google]
199KB, 311x282px
>>75575725
>when the predator fans still think sweeping the dried up reddithawks somehow legitimizes their team for the rest of the playoffs
>>
Goal soon. Confirmed
>>
ducks score 2 soon
>>
In the more exciting game, T Birds up 5-2
>>
I think the Ducks are going to win
not that I give a fuck
>>
>>75575779
>bloos fan thinks unironically dropping a game to the whyld means they're good
wut
>>
Should the NHL have the Ducks and Oilers redo this game in case it was a big fluke?
No disrespect to the oilers, I'm a firm believer that Edmonton beating them is a huge fluke and robs the Ducks of truly accomplishing what their capable of. I've spent the last few hours in pure disbelief and it just doesn't make sense to me. I've spent the entire regular season watching the Ducks play great hockey it's just not fair.
If the Ducks lose again I will face that the Oilers deserved the win, but I am just 100% sure it was a fluke and does a big disservice to the Ducks and the NHL.
>>
>>75575720
>You made a statement (Bernie would have raised taxes on the middle class)
Hmm, i meant to say compared to Trump, but oh well.
I did prove that if you voted for sanders over trump you would be voting against your own economic interests, which is true my chart shows
>>
File: 1460161837695.jpg (12KB, 211x212px) Image search:
[Google]
12KB, 211x212px
>>75575777
y-you too thanks
>>
>>75575751
Fuck off dumb leaf . Just because it's trendy to be Drumpf supporter on 4chinz doesn't mean he was the better candidate
>>
Oilers you know you're allowed to win faceoffs right?
>>75575800
You did that just to meme him didn't you.
>>
>>75575779
>Preds sweep the Hawks
>"It's just the reddithawks lol"
The fact the preds neutralized Kane and towes, and the scoring is pretty good. And only allow 3 goals where rinne has been lacking at times. That's impressive. Now the flames...
>>
PENULTY
>>
>>75575796
It's not just a river in Egypt.
>>
Shiit here it comes boys
>>
>>75575812
blah blah blah kill your enemy blah blah blah he wins
>>
If dubls will get over time
>>
>>75575804
>Drumpf
>>>/reddit/
>>
What a weak call. These refs are shit.
>>
i feel so fucking bored and let down, there are no memes happening
>>
>>75575804
He legitimately was.
Also
>drumphhhh
Do you watch jon oliver? lol
>>
>>75575804
>Voting for a Clinton ever when they're the ones who ruined this country
>>
File: 1475147045387.jpg (11KB, 290x269px) Image search:
[Google]
11KB, 290x269px
>>75575814
Fuck Bernie, I said FUCK YOU
EAT ME ASS AND FUCK YOUR OWN FACE
I'M DECLARING WAR ON /paul/
WHO'S WITH ME
>>
>>75575831
It was still the right call
>>
>>75575318
Surrey. They always come down here and buy milk
>>
>>75575831
Literally holds the stick for his life
>>
Wtf why can the ducks be literal goons and never get called but oilers sneeze and get a penalty ?
>>
>>75575831
>Almost a breakaway
>Hold the stick so he can't get away
Lucky it wasn't a penalty shot desu.
>>
File: 1378452130918.jpg (14KB, 340x234px) Image search:
[Google]
14KB, 340x234px
GET IT TOGETHER
>>
PING
>>
The game turned on that Getzlaf non-call
>>
>all these jabronis missed that lucky post save because they're arguing about politicians
>>
that was a good goal
>>
38-18 shots now?
>>
>>75575856
>OILERS MVP CONFIRMED THE POST
>>
Talbot is literally the only reason oilers have a chance
>>
>>75575869
i didn't miss shit -_-
>>
>>75575885
that's usually how hockey works. the goalie should be the best player
>>
Inb4 cheeky lucky bounce ooilers goal
>>
File: monkey600lblife.jpg (64KB, 632x545px) Image search:
[Google]
64KB, 632x545px
Laughing SO HARD at the Anaheim ducks
>>
>>75575796
the original post has over 16K "upboats" now
it's officially a god-tier may-may
>>
>>75575905
Bad goalie duels are way funnier though tbqh.
>>
>>75575885
>Only reason
>Implying there isn't other offensive players
>Implying that the Oilers are Also playing very risky but conservatively
They have some good defense. Larsson and sekera have done things to help this team
>>
>>75575899
>Doesnt talk much
>can change shape
>everywhere is fuckable
>>
what the fuck is his problem?
>>
Fuck off with the politics you faggots.
>>
File: mcdavid-crosby.jpg (315KB, 1180x664px) Image search:
[Google]
315KB, 1180x664px
Soon.
>>
>>75575864
This.
They then give them a weak call, and have to give them that highstick. All of sudden, momentum shift to Ducks in the matter of 5min.
I wish refs would just call the game as they see it, and not based on the score.
>>
>>75575926
californian team? probably meth
>>
>>75575926
He sucks penisdick
>>
File: 1463359609275.png (8KB, 225x225px) Image search:
[Google]
8KB, 225x225px
>I
>JUST
>STOP
>SUCKING
>COCK
there's a special hell waiting just all of you fuckers
shut the fuck up or leave
>>
Were gonna lose arent we
>>
>>75575926
He doesnt care about hokkei anymore
>>
>>75575926
He's mad that the Oilers passed up on him to draft Marc-Antoine Pouliot and sentenced him to a career of despair and misery with the Anaheim Mighty Cucks.
>>
3-2 DUCKS!
>>
DING
>>
>>75575931
Hnnnnnnngggg
>>
PING
>>
File: IMG_9966.jpg (192KB, 1855x1045px) Image search:
[Google]
192KB, 1855x1045px
>>75575926
He saw some shit nobody should, or is addicted to meth like a mother fucker
>>
>>75575938
If they did ducks would be up 4-1
>>
>>75575952
>Stanley Cup ring
doubt that t b h
>>
>>75575947
>>75575925
>is just a shitty plot device and not an actual character
Please consider having better taste
>>
>>75575952
They also refused to trade Comrie for him
>>
thank you based post
>>
>"hasn't been able to find the fuck"
what did he mean by this?
>>
>>75575931
that would be incredible
>>
>>75575972
Like what? A spider? Nobody wants to fuck rachnera unless you are that desperate
>>
>>75575967
Nah, the ducks get away with slashes like nobodies buisness. Literally a slash on every play.
>>
>>75575980
the man's obviously a Virgin
>>
Post MVP desu
>>
CLINK: the game
>>
>>75575980
tfw no gf
>>
>>75575993
right post (left from goaltender's perspective)
>>
>>75575975
That's a load of crap. Nobody wanted Comrie.
>>
>>75575989
Who said anything about the spidercunt? Both Suu and her are just "resolve plot" buttons and totally worthless outside of that
>>
File: 1478980471628.jpg (454KB, 480x480px) Image search:
[Google]
454KB, 480x480px
>>75575993
>>75575993
>>
>mcinvisible
>>
File: 1492999692283.jpg (75KB, 454x340px) Image search:
[Google]
75KB, 454x340px
>FOWLER
>>
>>75575926
My friend grew up with him in Peterborough and is one of his best friends.
>>
lmao that nigga fell down
>>
Laughing so hard at Fowler
>>
Fucking ducks must have pissed off a medicine man or something.
>>
>all these slips
just how bad is the ice in analheim
>>
>Fowler
L M F A O
M
F
A
O
>>
>SLIPPERHEIM
WHERE'S THE GYPSY
>>
Please win. Please
>>
File: 1485557768128.jpg (8KB, 152x182px) Image search:
[Google]
8KB, 152x182px
>>75576024
>I don't know why but I larffed
You get my special MVP, anon =3
>>
>>75576030
lake ice hockey
>>
File: 1428808722474.jpg (14KB, 227x294px) Image search:
[Google]
14KB, 227x294px
>KEKS
KOVING
EVERY
KAUGH
>>
If McDavid had done that it would have been a hockey play. Honestly first athlete I've wished a career ending injury on.
>>
File: latest[1].jpg (54KB, 500x389px) Image search:
[Google]
![latest[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/5BhFr8T.jpg "latest[1]")
54KB, 500x389px
THIS DOES NOT FOOKIN SLIP
>>75575993
>>
File: 13516428_1363574253657674_1943596139636668305_n.jpg (84KB, 960x640px) Image search:
[Google]
84KB, 960x640px
>assheim cucks
>>
File: mcdavid.png (106KB, 233x274px) Image search:
[Google]
106KB, 233x274px
More like Cam Faller!!
>>
3-1 incoming
>>
>>75576058
LELMAO!!!!!
>>
Any one else want peanut butter?
>>
How can one team be so good an have such shit luck ?
>>
If Perry's so fucking useless, why not elbow McGayKid in the face?
>>
File: ghostbusters.png (234KB, 592x229px) Image search:
[Google]
234KB, 592x229px
>THE SOON TO BE SWEPT CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
>>
GOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAL
>>
>>75576092
You mean shorks?
>>
Edmonton didn't deserve this win...
>>
File: 67FCknx[1].png (7KB, 696x193px) Image search:
[Google]
![67FCknx[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/YSnkvdN.png "67FCknx[1]"){kind=small}
7KB, 696x193px
Oilels getting bailed out hard.
>>
ducks get a shorty
check em
>>
>ducks on the pk
>get away with holds, hooks and slashes
This shit is disgusting. The refs just put their whistles away when a team is shorthanded.
>>
>>75576092
Anaheim got really lucky against Calgary. It probably should have been a 5-6 game series
>>
>>75576114
Fuck off pussy
>>
>>75575145
holy shit faggot is there some fund I can donate to get you and your boyfriend deported?
>>
>>75576108
They deserved it. But it's a game of what ifs. If those pucks went in, it would be a 6 goal period right now, but that didn't happen
>>
>cant even get possession on the power play
oilers def dont deserve to win
>>
>>75576108
They scored more goals than the opposing team didn't they
>>
>>75576114
This is how playoff hockey actually is, sorry you're too young to remember what it's like.
>>
>>75576109
Huh, I thought hockey games were based on score, not shot total.
>>
Oh there we go. The yearly Cucks chimpout is beginning finally.
>>
Ducks really deserve this win..
>>
File: IMG_0076.jpg (52KB, 487x416px) Image search:
[Google]
52KB, 487x416px
>>75576109
Blues also got bailed out in their series pretty much. Outshot heavily from the wild, but they squeaked out a win
>>
Anagoons
>>
man, you know anaheim is getting desperate when they get this thuggy
>>
>>75576155
Shoyld be 1-1 desu. Gifted a pp goal
>>
>>75576160
>>75576160
>Ducks really deserve this win..
no because they didn't score
>>
Why do these guys have such beef with each other
>>
File: 1465879828254.jpg (16KB, 261x193px) Image search:
[Google]
16KB, 261x193px
>even with the fucking /paul/fags, still fucking /comfy/ AF
>>
>ducks
how fucking scrub this this team?
they're like cross checking people to get them down then they land on them and to get up they use the stick upon the oiler's necks like a guillotine cut
it's truly disgusting to watch anaheim play, i hope this team is stopped in four.
>>
>>75576173
I'm sure that's all they'll be talking about in the history books.
>>
>>75576176
Cucks do this literally EVERY year in the playoffs. They start losing, go down in a series, get really fucking mad, chimp out, then lose the series.
Out of all the "good" teams they might actually have the worst leadership in the entire league. It's absolutely embarrassing.
>>
>>75576169
The only Anaheim teams that were good were the 2003 and 2014 teams. Rest are either hot messed or filled with goons
>>
Honestly the Ducks are the better team and deserve to win this game. At the very least the NHL should make them go to an OT if they don't tie it up.
>>
so anaheim in 5 right?
>>
>>75576192
Getzlaf was chimping the fuck out at the end of game 1. Not surprised.
>>
>>75576202
Anaheim in 7. Oilers are soooo fucking lucky
>>
>>75576192
>Top teams have worse leadership
So the caps have bad fans? When's the last time I've heard them do something wrong?
Also, cucks
>>
File: walkhard.png (617KB, 836x600px) Image search:
[Google]
617KB, 836x600px
>tfw most people don't want to admit that luck plays a huge role in who win playoff series
A few inches on two shots in this period, and Ducks lead instead of trail.
>>
>>75576212
t. increasingly nervous duck for the 2nd time this series
>>
no energy in the arena holy shit lmao
>>
Bernier when?
>>
>>75576193
>Not the year they won the cup
You know, the team that is widely considered one of the best teams to ever play.
>>
>>75576212
get the broom
>>
If someone only saw the faceoffs won and shots, they would think the Ducks were winning!
>>
>>75576214
No a lot of the top teams have good leadership and that's why they're so often able to get their shit together while losing and come back. WIth the Ducks it's the opposite.
Who the fuck knows what the Caps issue is. They were cursed by a witch doctor or some shit.
>>
>>75576181
Pretty much. If you haven't already, look up corporate welfare (subsidies/grants); that shit'll trigger the absolute fuck out of you
>>
>>75576104
I would rather just beat vick or kill him. I want McDavid to be hurt and out of play forever, not dead or physically disabled.
>tanking for years
>rigging the lottery
>literally destroying the futures of dozens of players
(((Good guys)))
If you are pro oilers you are pro bettman
>>
>>75576161
Tbf to the Blues, most of Wild's shots were from shitty angles and they played like asses on defense. Wasn't a 4-1 series, but Blues definitely deserved to beat them.
>>
>>75576192
Leadership is a myth. Just produce points.
>>
>>75576236
Keep fucking dreaming
>>
>>75576216
Inch inspiration pix
Also
PANTSPOILERS WILL TAKE THIS SERIES
>>
>>75576253
>t. neckbeard autist who has never played any team sport ever
>>
File: 1472426644287.jpg (60KB, 443x440px) Image search:
[Google]
60KB, 443x440px
>literally not watching the game, or any game
>literally posting off topic
>>
>>75576237
too bad they count goals, not faceoff wins you idiot
>>
File: IMG_1043.jpg (102KB, 625x761px) Image search:
[Google]
102KB, 625x761px
KEKS BLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEOOOOOOOO
>>
>>75576200
They aren't. Randy carlyle as your head coach can only mean that you will fail. Oilers have the better depth, defense, and scoring. Oilers have /m/c/ /d/a/v/i/d, draisaitl, maroon, nugent Hopkins, eberle, and good defensive players in nurse and larsson. Ducks have eaves, perry, getzlaf, silverberg, and fowler. It's close matchup, but Oilers are better
>>
Ducks in 6.
>>
File: 5434082+_0ee014e93761d258ad5b8dff30e5e9b6.jpg (8KB, 300x169px) Image search:
[Google]
8KB, 300x169px
>ducks
AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
>>
>Cucks
>>
What the FUCK. WHY DID THE BETTER TEAM LOSE AGAIN. WHAT IS THIS BULLSHIT
>>
Surprised McDavid didn't try to shoot for the Open net to pad his stats.
>>
Ducks in 5 cap this shit
>>
>>75576274
>ducks in 4
>ducks in 5
>ducks in 6
lol
>>
gg Ducks
See you in Edmonton.
>>
>>75576265
because EVERYONE knows that lucky shots are more important than doing objectively better in every other category eh
>>
File: 1486897873540.jpg (78KB, 720x720px) Image search:
[Google]
78KB, 720x720px
>>75576274
>>
Fuck this shitty """""""sport""""""". Literally luck puck
>>
LAUGHING SO HARD AT ANAHEIM
>>
>>75576212
>SOOOO LUCKY
You mean that the ducks can't shoot the puck at the net when it's needed, and they also got outplayed by a hot goalie who knew what he was supposed to do. If you want to win, then have Gibson see the damn puck
>>
>Dooks
Huehuehuehuehue
Now watch as the Oilels fans party hard in your stadium's parking lot
>>
>>75576285
>Better team
>Can't put as many pucks behind a line in 60 minutes as the other team
>is somehow better than them
>>
>>75576200
The better team would have more goals you fucking faggot kys yourself
>>
>>75576262
It's a myth. Did Toews suddenly stop being a good leader these past few years? Did Messier suddenly stop being a good leader his last 7 years in the league? Don't be a retard and believe myths. Talent is all that matter. It's all that's real.
>>
Holy shit that was a Kursk tier onslaught.
>>
>>75576292
"lucky shot"
lmao lad stay mad
>>
>>75576303
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
Holy FUCK that is not a game we should have won
>>
I'm not even that worried because weve been so much fucking better
>>
File: 1477758696884.png (17KB, 429x411px) Image search:
[Google]
17KB, 429x411px
lel Cucks throw everything they have at us, while our boys play like garbage and they STILL lose lmao. Calgayry must really suck ass.
>>
>>75576238
Caps probably have some fucked up curse with the presidency, and that if they win, the capital will, metaphorically, explode. Also, the caps have issued against the pens and islanders in the playoffs
>>75576251
Also, Wild had the worst coach to have in playoff games. Worse then capuano
>>
I'm not even a ducks fan but even I know they got screwed over hard by refpuck this game. LOL to NHL officating
>>
>>75576340
second time you've said that lad
its time to worry
>>
Nashville gets an even easier route lmao. Holy shit its our year
>>
>>75575145
naw, we don't like people who give up on their own countries. make an effort with your own country.
>>
>>75575149
when you turn on the TV, is there a special channel just for you?
>>
>>75576315
>kiss yourself
thank you for bringing some love to the thread, Kazak
>>
>>75576303
lol @ americlap
>>
>>75576356
Refs, ice, luck....
All part of the game ameri-bro
>>
>preds win lol
>>
>>75576364
Nashville getting an easier route implies that they play the ducks.
>>
>>75576382
I don't get this
>>
>>75576365
This!
Refugees should fight for home, not invade and spoil another location
>>
>>75575227
What the fuck is wrong with you
BC and newf are both pretty shit desu
>>
>>75576382
for some reason this made me laugh more than I expected
>>
File: 1353293346090.png (95KB, 537x2414px) Image search:
[Google]
95KB, 537x2414px
>>75576348
>It's basically another word for Supply Side economics
Yes and even the term supply side economics is fucking stupid.
How is massive government spending "supply side"?
Why don't we try actual FREE MARKET economics instead of all this leftist bullshit?
>Read stuff, senpai.
You read stuff desu. Supply side is just a soft form of keynesianism.
Chicago school was just keynesian lite. They support central banks and all that corporate bullshit.
>And you obviously don't know what Supply Side means.
Oh the irony.
>Taxes were much higher.
Actually they WEREN'T pic related.
It's hilarious when idiots think the 50s was high taxes. They were very low for vast majority of the population, they were only high on people that made the equivalent to like 2 million dollars a year in today's dollars, ALSO there were so many loopholes back then, nobody paid that rate. If taxes were actually that high, the economy couldn't function.
>>
Welp time to chamge from ducks to preds
>>
>>75575263
You don't need a fucking ferry ameritard, they're both mainland
>>
>>75576413
His name is Steve and he is cuckold retarted, ignore his post.
>>
>>75576356
You LITERALLY had a goal given back to you
>>
>>75576432
>use real economic terms
>no, not that one. I don't like that one.
Goalposts: moved
>Free market economics
Speaking of stupid, made-up terms. There's no such thing as a "free" market -- only a market that's more difficult for some than others.
>If taxes were actually that high, the economy couldn't function
I said they were higher... and they were. Again, moving the goalposts.
>>
Ducks cannot into oil
>>
>>75576531
>Goalposts: moved
lmao no
trickle down isn't a real economic term
also calling any economic policy that involves lowering taxes "supply side" is intellectually dishonest
Supply side was just something created for the reagan administration, it doesn't even apply today. That's why you need to use real economic terms.
>Speaking of stupid, made-up terms.
Uh no lol, free market economics was something actually applied before and world very well.
>There's no such thing as a "free" market
There's plenty of examples of free market in history. Honestly what the fuck are you even talking about?
>I said they were higher... and they were.
lmao I just wrote out an argument showing how they clearly weren't and even had an image linking to a study showing they weren't.
>Again, moving the goalposts.
No, you're just empirically wrong lol, see the image.
You completely ignored my argument.
Nobody even paid those taxes.
Boy the 50s success was in a low tax environment?
Hmm that must make you whiny leftists pretty butthurt.
You people just enjoy being poor and enslaved for some reason. Go drink more corporate/government cum.
>>
>>75575225
Literally fucking this, even if you're some deformed mongoloid you can still afford to get a fine ass bitch in Tijuana (1 mile from San Diego) for less than 15 bucks, 20 bucks if you want a more curvaceous one.
And a California 8 in most other places is a 10 just a friendly FYI
>>
>>75576356
They called oilers for every thing they could .
They took back a goal even
And you still want to try saying ref puck
>>
>>75576587
>also calling any economic policy that involves lowering taxes "supply side" is intellectually dishonest
Drastically lowering taxes usually comes with drastic deregulation, and that would essentially be what Trickle Down is. You realize that words aren't something that exist in nature, right? We create them.
>supply side was just something created for the reagan administration, it doesn't even apply today
Trumponomics is basically Reaganomics on steroids, so yeah, I'd say it applies.
>there are plenty of examples of the free market
I'm saying it's not some objective thing. Kinda the same thing you're espousing regarding Trickle Down. Try to keep up, pal.
>lmao I just wrote out an argument showing how they clearly weren't
Stop saying "lmao", it makes you look desperate to win the argument. Anyway, the U.S. raised taxes after WWII in order to pay for it, you absolute moron. When you say "they lowered them after WWII", you're wrong -- intuitively, that doesn't even make sense.
>>
>>75576682
All these lolbertarian spergs on /sp/ want to take us back to the gilded ages
>>
>>75576707
>All these lolbertarian spergs on /sp/ want to take us back to the gilded ages
You mean where wages rose dramatically, prices fell dramatically, and working hours shrank? For 30 STRAIGHT YEARS?
Going back to the same laws of the gilded age today would be fucking AWESOME. The working class would probably only have to work 3 days a week and we'd all be rich with high savings rates.
Kill yourself you clueless central bank supporting fucking faggot.
inb4 muh standard oil or muh child labour whining
>>
File: syrios2_0.png (113KB, 693x429px) Image search:
[Google]
113KB, 693x429px
>>75576682
>Drastically lowering taxes usually comes with drastic deregulation
So? That's just an aspect of "supply side economics. Things like this were done before and weren't called supply side economics.
>and that would essentially be what Trickle Down is.
All trickle down is is a leftist strawman argument.
Reagan INCREASED regulations, spending and some taxes.
What is needed is real free market economics with REAL spending cuts.
Trump is a fucking leftist and so was reagan.
>Trumponomics is basically Reaganomics on steroids
So left wing keynesianism. Got it.
>I'm saying it's not some objective thing.
It is though. I don't know why you people don't get this.
If you leftists used words like free market vs socialist/government controlled then we'd be much closer to what things actually are.
>Stop saying "lmao"
lmao :^)
>it makes you look desperate to win the argument.
because I already did and you couldn't refute the fact that taxes were lower in the 50s?
>Anyway, the U.S. raised taxes after WWII in order to pay for it
That's empirically false. That's when they LOWERED taxes. After the war the government dramatically cut spending, taxes and regulations which lead to the most economically productive year in american history.
Do you know anything.
Also during this entire period tax receipts are exactly the same adjusted for inflation as today. pic related. How in the world would taxes been that high? It's impossible.
Also read this, you're literally wrong.
http://www.taxhistory.org/thp/readings.nsf/ArtWeb/FE35B2AF92BE72718525785A004C98F6?OpenDocument
>>
Politics sports and religion.
/psr/
>>
>>75576647
Give to the needy anon
>>
Who won .
>>
>>75576824
>Things like this were done before and weren't called supply side economics
Again, words and terms are invented. You're being very petty.
>Reagan INCREASED regulations, spending and some taxes.
Ok, you're completely off the rails at this point. Overall, he lowered taxes by 30% and decreased regulations. But you're right that he increased spending.
>Reagan increased regulations
W.A.T.
>because I already did and you couldn't refute the fact that taxes were lower in the 50s?
Lower than WHAT?
>How in the world would taxes been that high?
The top marginal rate is deceiving, I know. I never said otherwise. You are REALLY projecting with your strawman claims. But overall, taxes went up after WWII
https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/rick-newman/2012/11/28/when-americans-took-pride-in-paying-taxes
>>
File: chart-2-McLaughlin-Increase-Regulatory-Restrictions.png (58KB, 1170x784px) Image search:
[Google]
58KB, 1170x784px
>>75576940
>Again, words and terms are invented
I know. I'm saying certain words only serve to confuse and are not accurate and thus should be changed. Is this too difficult for you to understand?
>decreased regulations
Yes pic related.
Also:
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/12/ronald-reagan-big-government-legacy
>Lower than WHAT?
Lower than the insane false 90% you people like to throw around. They clearly weren't that high and I already explained why.
>The top marginal rate is deceiving, I know.
You needed to make like 3.5 million a year in todays dollars lmao. Also literally everyone could deduct anything.
For everyone before this rate taxes were actually very low. That's why there was so much economic growth during this time.
>In 1944, you could deduct business meals, all business travel, all forms of interest payments, and much more. You could even deduct spousal travel expenses on a business trip! (Why travel alone?) Companies could also "loan" or "provide" almost anything to an employee, from an apartment to standard benefits. It was possible to shelter tens of thousands of dollars from taxable income. Three-martini lunches and expense accounts were important realities, skewing tax calculations.
>As a result of deductions and exclusions, even the theoretical maximum Real Rate of taxation at 60% in 1944 overstates taxation dramatically. The reality? On earned income, the richest U.S. taxpayers paid close to 40 percent of their earned incomes in taxes in 1944. We simply didn't count much of the compensation as taxable income.
>You are REALLY projecting with your strawman claims.
The irony. You know you're wrong and are whining about it.
>But overall, taxes went up after WWII
I just showed you evidence from a well sourced tax article that taxes decreased by about 13 billion in 1940s dollars.
Also honestly it wasn't really the taxes that made the post war boom, it was the GIGANTIC cuts in government spending.
Something you AND trump do not support.
>>
>>75577060
>I know. I'm saying certain words only serve to confuse and are not accurate and thus should be changed
I could say the same about The Free Market™
Overall, Reagan decreased regulations (which were previously in place) during his term; you have provided no evidence to the contrary. In fact, your graph supports my claim, dummy.
>for everyone before this rate taxes were actually very low. That's why there was so much economic growth during this time
"Low" is relative. Relative to today? No, they were not low (On earned income, the richest U.S. taxpayers paid close to 40 percent of their earned incomes in taxes in 1944). They also weren't super high. Again, I never brought up the 90% top rate, you're just strawmanning.
>>
>>75577168
>I could say the same about The Free Market™
Okay, explain to me how the term "free market" only serves to confuse and deceive?
What is confusing and deceiving about it?
>Overall, Reagan decreased regulations
He decreased some(which was a good thing) but increased others. He increased far more than he decreased. Did you even see the pic I posted? lel
>In fact, your graph supports my claim, dummy.
The graph literally shows him increasing regulations.
Can you even read graphs?
>No, they were not low
They actually were.
For anyone making under the equivalent of 3.5 million dollars your taxes were like 15 percent or something. That's extremely low. Plenty of small businesses could operate in that environment. That's why there were so many small businesses during that time.
>the richest U.S. taxpayers paid close to 40 percent
Right now the average business owner pays about 55+ percent when you include all of the taxes he has to pay.
The only way for the super rich to pay almost no taxes is to be a gigantic megacorporation like google and apple and use loopholes to get around paying high taxes. That's not a good thing, it just makes these large corporations(which there are few of) grow while vast majority of the economy stagnates. Small businesses are key to economic growth and that's what the 50s provided.
>Again, I never brought up the 90% top rate
You claimed they were super high back then, that's what you are arguing. The typical liberal argument I get is that there was 90% tax rate and that's why the 50s was prosperous. I have no idea why liberals believe such a dumb thing.
>hurrrr small businesses got fucked over MORE and that's why the economy thrived
lol it makes no sense at all
>>
>>75577265
>What is confusing and deceiving about it?
For starters: freedom is merely a construct of the imagination.
>Can you even read graphs?
You're right, I misunderstood that. But the fact is, he drastically lowered regulations on Wall Street, which fucked people over. And I'd like to actually see a breakdown of those regulations vs. deregulation.
>for anyone making under the equivalent of 3.5 million dollars your taxes were like 15 percent or something
Show me that OVERALL tax rates were lower in the 50's than they are today (or in the 40's). I don't buy it.
>right now the average business owner pays about 55+ percent when you include all of the taxes he has to pay
I found nothing that comes even close to 55%. Source?
I gotta go to bed soon, but I must say: I really hope you're a U.S. citizen, 'cause otherwise, it would be really fucking pathetic that you give this much of a shit about U.S. politics.
>b b but it effects me too
>>
>>75577412
>>75577265
you guys gunna fuck yet or what?
>>
>>75577453
Naw, anon is already married to ™Freedom™
>>
>>75577412
>freedom is merely a construct of the imagination.
No, it's an objective thing.
>DUDE THERE'S NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NORTH KOREA AND AMERICA
>IT'S ALL IN YOUR MIND BRO
>he drastically lowered regulations on Wall Street
No he didn't.
Wall street and the banking industry is the most regulated thing in america after healthcare.
The slight amount of regulations he reduced are irrelevant.
>which fucked people over
How? lol
>Show me that OVERALL tax rates were lower in the 50's than they are today
What do you mean by overall?
For the vast majority of the population, YES they were lower than today. For the 0.01%(not even the 1%) they were around 40%.
I mean how could you not buy it?
How the fuck would businesses be able to operate if taxes for everyone was 90% back then? makes no sense
>I found nothing that comes even close to 55%.
Including federal, state and local, it's about 45-55%. Not even including countless other taxes like gas taxes, property taxes etc.
Also the corporate tax rate is extremely high compared to most 1st world nations including my country.
>it would be really fucking pathetic that you give this much of a shit about U.S. politics.
It's just interesting what your couldn't could have been.
If you had abolished the federal reserve, dramatically cut spending and taxes you guys would probably be super rich and the average worldweek would be 2-3 days per week. You'd be building moon colonies probably, reeeeeeeeeeee
>>
>>75577478
At least I'm not married to slavery.
:^)
>>
>>75577537
>No, it's an objective thing
It's literally not. Prove to me that freedom exists. Prove to me that it's possible to truly be free. You cannot. See: determinism
>the slight amount of regulations he reduced are irrelevant
>how? Lololololol
Looser lending regulations dramatically changed spending behavior and contributed to the debt.
>What do you mean by overall?
All tolled. Taxes, in general, adjusted for inflation.
>if taxes were 90%
There you go again with the 90%
>it's about 45-55%
Great source
>Also the corporate tax rate is extremely high compared to most 1st world nations including my country
I'm aware, but most of them pay MUCH less than the top rate. In fact, 1 in 4 pay nothing (and not just the ones that report profit losses)
>>
File: Single_rates.png (82KB, 640x258px) Image search:
[Google]
82KB, 640x258px
>>75577662
>Prove to me that it's possible to truly be free.
Example: The government restricts your right to free speech or it doesn't.
>See: determinism
No shit. That doesn't mean you can be free or not free from government oppression.
>Looser lending regulations dramatically changed spending behavior and contributed to the debt.
So lower regulations increased GOVERNMENT spending and made more debt?
Hmm it seems here that the problem here is government.
>Taxes, in general, adjusted for inflation.
The amount of money the government got in taxes is not what's in question here. It's the effective tax rates.
>There you go again with the 90%
Again, it's what most liberals say about the 50s.
>Great source
Top rate in usa is about 40% federally pic related
State taxes average 5-13%.
Sorry.
>In fact, 1 in 4 pay nothing
Yes I talked about that here:
>>75577265
>>
>>75577749
>Example: The government restricts your right to free speech or it doesn't
You're referring to specific laws. Remember, this quibbling began over the problem with economic terms. And the fact that freedom doesn't intrinsically exist is why one could find the term "free market" to be problematic.
>That doesn't mean you can be free or not free from government oppression
Oppression can be a matter of perspective. For example: deregulating ethics based regulations would be less oppressive for corporations... not so much for the consumer.
>so lower regulations increased GOVERNMENT spending and made more debt?
We've already covered that, anon. It also increased consumer spending because people were getting loans that they couldn't afford.
>the amount of money the government got in taxes is not what's in question here. It's the effective tax rates
How is it NOT what's in question. If you don't think that's relevant, I don't know what to tell you.
>Again, it's what most liberals say about the 50s.
I thought i made it clear that I wasnt one of those liberals. Lemme guess, mises.org is your only source for this information.
>Top rate in usa is about 40% federally pic related
State taxes average 5-13%.
>right now the average business owner pays about 55+ percent when you include all of the taxes he has to pay.
You're all over the place
>>
>>75577872
>You're referring to specific laws.
That's literally all I meant when I speak of freedom.
>And the fact that freedom doesn't intrinsically exist is why one could find the term "free market" to be problematic.
Literally all a free market means is a market where the government only has a minimal role to play. Nobody is talking about philosophy here.
> For example: deregulating ethics based regulations would be less oppressive for corporations... not so much for the consumer.
But it wouldn't. You don't have to buy their products or work for them.
>We've already covered that, anon.
We didn't.
>It also increased consumer spending
That's not necessarily a bad thing and is not the sole reason economic bubbles happen.
>people were getting loans
Thanks to low interest rates from the central bank and other government created factors.
https://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Savings_and_loan_crisis
sources at the bottom
>How is it NOT what's in question.
Because the government can get LESS in revenue if they raise taxes sometimes. Or if their is an economic downturn they'll get less.
What matters is the rate. It's literally all we've been talking about.
>I thought i made it clear that I wasnt one of those liberals.
Ohhhhh, so you don't think taxes were high in the 50s?
How high do you think they were then?
>mises.org
Everything on mises.org is well sourced using mainstream sources.
>You're all over the place
How in the world did you not understand what I had just said?
I don't know how I can make it any more clear.
>>
File: 475jR2sI9843iwehU9mfw028js.jpg (350KB, 680x680px) Image search:
[Google]
350KB, 680x680px
>>75576356
>I'm not even a ducks fan but even I know they got screwed over hard by refpuck
mfw.
ducks were wearing black, m8
>>
>>75576450
i'm none of those things
>>
File: 1.4.12-Biggs-Chart-1-867x630.jpg (76KB, 867x630px) Image search:
[Google]
76KB, 867x630px
>>75577749
https://www.thebalance.com/how-much-tax-do-small-businesses-pay-3974568
Small businesses of all types pay an estimated average effective tax rate of 19.8 percent
>no one is talking philosophy here
You're the one who brought up the problem with economic terms. You can't simply discard the ones you don't like and expect people to accept the ones that you subscribe to.
>But it wouldn't. You don't have to buy their products or work for them
This is, by far, the most simple-minded thing you've posted so far. If there were more effective ethics-based regulations on the pharmaceutical industry, we wouldn't pay more than any nation on earth for our medication; the lack of regulations is making Big Pharma an insane amount of money, and the masses are "oppressed" as a result.
>that's not necessarily a bad thing
Didn't say it was
>how high do you think they were then?
Ok, so apparently, all told, they were lower than they are today; however, you're still wrong that they went down post WWII. The wealthy paid more, tho.
>>
>>75578150
>the wealthy paid more, tho
*than they do today
>>
>>75578150
>Small businesses of all types pay an estimated average effective tax rate of 19.8 percent
Nobody was even talking about small business tax rates you fucking idiot. We were talking about personal income taxes for people. For the so called 1%.
Even if the owner of a business gets taxed at 19.8 he still has his personal income taxes to worry about.
>You're the one who brought up the problem with economic terms.
Economics isn't philosophy. lol
>If there were more effective ethics-based regulations on the pharmaceutical industry, we wouldn't pay more than any nation on earth for our medication; the lack of regulations is making Big Pharma an insane amount
This is the most insane amount of cognitive dissonance I've ever seen. It's the EXACT opposite.
Big pharma OWNS AND CONTROLS THE FDA
If the FDA were abolished and patents and copyright were abolished(which is what a free market is) the price of medicine would fall through the fucking floor and everyone could afford medicine.
They use these regulations to boost prices and fuck over their competition. The answer to fix this bullshit is FREEDOM
>Ok, so apparently, all told, they were lower than they are today
Well I finally got you to admit that at least.
Now do you understand why the 50s was so prosperous? Not saying low tax rates were the only reason(low spending compared to today and fewer regulations helped) but low taxes were a big reason.
>however, you're still wrong that they went down post WWII
http://www.taxhistory.org/thp/readings.nsf/ArtWeb/FE35B2AF92BE72718525785A004C98F6?OpenDocument
>>
>>75578243
>Even if the owner of a business gets taxed at 19.8 he still has his personal income taxes to worry about
When you said "business owner" earlier, I assumed you were referring to business tax rates.
>economics isn't philosophy
It CAN BE; especially when you bring semantics into it.
>Big pharma OWNS AND CONTROLS THE FDA
They bribe the shit out of them, yes, but it's not necessarily incompatible with my point. I think we're coming at it from opposite directions -- I'm thinking of examples like Martin Shkreli, and you're thinking of regulations on copyrights. I think we can actually meet in the middle on this one.
>Now do you understand why the 50s was so prosperous?
I think you're grossly oversimplifying things.
And dude, copypaste some shit ffs, I'm not gonna read an entire article
>>
>>75578426
>When you said "business owner" earlier
no, personal tax rates.
>It CAN BE
I'm not talking about the philosophical aspect of economics.
>but it's not necessarily incompatible with my point
It absolutely is. You claim that the FDA and other regulations hold now and prevent big pharma from fucking over consumers but then I explained how the FDA is HOW they fuck over consumers.
>I'm thinking of examples like Martin Shkreli
Who also used government regulation like copyright/patents to hike up drug prices. Also he gave it away for free to anyone that wanted it but that's another issue.
>I think you're grossly oversimplifying things.
No, and I explained that multiple things lead to the prosperity of the 50s, it was an overall lack of government control and pro free enterprise.
>And dude, copypaste some shit ffs, I'm not gonna read an entire article
Start from "Background" and read 4 paragraphs.
>>
>>75578486
>I'm not talking about the philosophical aspect of economics
Alright, it's not really worth bickering over, but you might wanna think twice before using the term "free market" if you have a problem with terms potentially obscuring things or misleading people.
>but then I explained how the FDA is HOW they fuck over consumers
No... you merely said "they own the FDA". That's hardly an explanation, because it isn't entirely true.
>Who also used government regulation like copyright/patents to hike up drug prices
Good point
>No, and I explained that multiple things lead to the prosperity of the 50s,
In extremely simplistic terms
>start from "Background" and read 4 paragraphs
Ok, so he lowered them... and then hiked them.
>>
>>75578623
>but you might wanna think twice before using the term "free market"
Why? I only use it in economic/political/legal terms.
>you merely said "they own the FDA".
Then I explained how they use the FDA to stomp out their competitors. Thanks to the FDA it costs billions to develop a drug and smaller companies can't afford to pay that. ALSO they get the FDA to ban drugs from competing firms.
ALSO the patent system is a regulation and it's the main reason drug costs are so high, they become a legal monopoly.
>In extremely simplistic terms
It's not extremely simplistic but yes I did say the 3 main things that made that period successful. What else could have contributed to it's success?
>and then hiked them.
way later and by only a little bit, also this was around the time everyone found out how the loopholes worked and the irs didn't even care
Anyway you're wrong, just be a libertarian already. Come on it's fun.
Why do you people enjoy working hard every day and getting little benefit. Fuck central banks.
>>
>>75578700
>Why? I only use it in economic/political/legal terms
Same way I use Trickle Down (Supply Side) economics.
>Then I explained how they use the FDA to stomp out their competitors
Yeah, I'm not exactly disagreeing, but let's be honest, copyrights and the patent system aren't going to fucking disappear, so I'd say the more pressing matter is to put in place ethics-based regulations that protect the consumer.
See, this is the problem with libertarians: you're always thinking in unrealistic hypotheticals.
>we just need everything to be like... super free and stuff.
>>
>>75578804
>Same way I use Trickle Down (Supply Side) economics.
Yes but your term doesn't make any fucking sense.
I already explained this.
Trickle down is a liberal strawman argument.
and supply side were just the policies of the reagan administration.
you retards say all policies involving lower taxes are "trickle down"
It's quite embarrassing, you don't know what you are talking about and are easily lead by pundits, politicians and the media
>copyrights and the patent system aren't going to fucking disappear
We can vote in parties that can at least minimize their role.
>so I'd say the more pressing matter is to put in place ethics-based regulations
regulations that are going to increase costs even more?
How do regulations help the consumer?
Also, the whole argument behind having patents on medicine is that drugs cost a lot to develop and the company needs to make profits to develop more drugs. Nobody is going to agree with price controls on drugs.
>you're always thinking in unrealistic hypotheticals.
It's not unrealistic at ALL. I mean america used to have a system that was almost free market and it worked really well.
>>we just need everything to be like... super free and stuff.
Seeing how I just demolished your arguments using libertarian theory, you're just mad and strawmanning my position after getting btfo.
Free markets objectively work and work much better than other systems.
>>
>>75578700
Also...
>what else could have contributed to its success
1. We were basically tasked with rebuilding the world after WWII, as our infrastructure was almost unscathed.
2. We almost had a monopoly on monetary gold, which gave us leverage in shaping trade.
3. Our factories were operating in full force
Just off the top of my head.
>>
>>75578960
>1. We were basically tasked with rebuilding the world after WWII, as our infrastructure was almost unscathed.
Wow you're telling me we had to waste our own resources to rebuild europe?
This should have been a detriment, not a benefit.
America was able to do this because it was so economically productive in the first place.
>We almost had a monopoly on monetary gold
No you just had a lot of gold.
It didn't matter though, americans produced the products that they consumed. They WERE the global economy.
>3. Our factories were operating in full force
Yes, because the land, labour and capital was freed up thanks to massive spending cuts and tax cuts. All of that capital went into the hands of the private sector instead for the war machine.
>>
Does this board not have bump limits wtf?
>>
>>75578943
>and supply side were just the policies of the reagan administration. you retards say all policies involving lower taxes are "trickle down"
The term started during the Reagan admin, and is certainly relevant during the Trump administration.
It's not difficult to understand, anon. Trickle Down economics is the idea that lower taxes + deregulation = more prosperity for the masses. And history has shown that's not always the case.
>we can vote in parties that can at least minimize their role
Uh huh
>how do regulations help the consumer
If they prevent shady business practices, they can help the consumer.
>seeing how I just demolished your arguments using libertarian theory
>declaring yourself the winner
Ouch
>>
>>75579133
>The term started during the Reagan admin, and is certainly relevant during the Trump administration.
No it's not.
Just because some economic theories have some of the same policies as others doesn't make them all the same.
Trump is protectionist, reagan was not.
Also you fail to explain why you idiots call any policy that involves things like lowering taxes "trickle down" or "supply side" when they are not necessarily that. It's as if simply wanting lower taxes is now "trickle down economics".
Are you this simple minded?
>And history has shown that's not always the case.
It's not the case when you couple this with massive LEFTIST government spending.
Obviously, socialism doesn't work.
>Trickle Down economics is the idea that lower taxes + deregulation = more prosperity for the masses.
No, trickle down was the reagan economic policy. Many other economic theories believe that lower taxes + deregulation = more prosperity for the masses.
You people don't even know the definition of terms and you just serve to confuse.
>Uh huh
lol your argument is that "well all parties are corrupt and aren't going to give us what we want so who cares"
Implementing a free market is very practical. I mean Ron Paul had a decent chance of winning. What's to say someone like him won't win next time?
>If they prevent shady business practices
Fraud laws and a court system already do that. That's part of the free market. The problem is the courts are corrupt and let the corporation win the case most of the time.
>>declaring yourself the winner
I did though, you just strawmanned everything I said in the entire thread because you had no argument.
Anyway I need to sleep now. bye
>>
>>75579046
>Wow you're telling me we had to waste our own resources to rebuild europe?
... do you honestly think it wasn't mutually beneficial?
Here you go:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post–World_War_II_economic_expansion
It's not nearly as simple as you're trying to make it out to be.
>>
>>75579228
>You people don't even know the definition of terms and you just serve to confuse
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply-side_economics
I defined it the way it's defined, and it's exactly what the Trump administration is doing.
>Trump is a protectionist
Oooo, he's a protectionist. Well, I guess that destroys my argument.
>>
What the fuck is even happening in this thread?
>>
>>75579356
2 people arguing about /pol/
>>
>>75579356
The mere mention of politicians sends millennials into autistic fits.
>>
>>75579076
It's 500
Thread posts: 431
Thread images: 72
Thread images: 72