>drafting anything other than a OT, QB, or DE in the first round

>>75481787
unironically any reciever could of done that

>>75481787
Look at all the success he's brought them

>>75481828
>could of

>>75481930
i could of pulled out of your mom but I didn't huh

File: IMG_2292.jpg (123KB, 534x629px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 534x629px

>already set at QB
>pretty set with edge rushers
>OTs are dogshit in this class and will be even worse by 24

Nah, Raiders are gonna take a LB/DB

RBs and WRs are a diamond dozen in this league. Especially in the new system

Cornerback is also acceptable. And it would be more accurate to specify specify DE/OLB. But yeah, aside from that you should only take a player of another position if they are exceptionally talented for that position and for that pick in the draft, or if they are one of the best available players and fill a position of immediate need on a contending team.

>>75482305
cornerback is easy to fuck up in the early rounds

>>75481768
You forgot DT and DB. But you're essentially right.

>>75481768
MLB and C are also solid options although less can't miss

>>75482474
Its way easier to develop those positions than sign a meme

>>75481828
No.

>>75481768
Good thing you aren't a GM

>Drafting a OL in the top 5
50% bust rate and 80% low ROI

>>75481768
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s04I7X51myA&t=88s

>>75481828
>anyone couldve done that
>not a single player has made a similar catch since then

Wew lad

Just don't take a RB, K, P, S, TE and you're good

>>75483277
deandre hopkins did vs the Giants, also

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bXJCi4QjS44

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gyNlKiKPLK4

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ivhHMbO51Q4

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=n4EzXdNYXuo

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QX3fM4WpSRo

do you want to cash in your L now or later?