I thought it worked brilliantly. Football will retain 99% of the spontaneity, all that will be lost are shit decisions and the lesser team winning.
http://www.strawpoll.me/12628173
http://www.strawpoll.me/12628173
http://www.strawpoll.me/12628173
It took pathetically long to decide on the clear onside call and took the sting out of the celebration.
>>74930214
More or less the same amount of time eaten up by players surrounding the referee.
Taktoo long, ruined celebration.
>>74930280
There wouldn't have been a celebration at all. The goal was going to be disallowed.
Besides, this isn't going to affect every goal. Just the iffy ones.
I am not for implement video refereeing but people who say that its better to stay out because it will not get rid of all mistakes are retarded or trolling.
Its like refusing to cure an injury because it will still hurt
>the video ref
The fuck are you on about
>>74930402
They used it for the France vs. Spain friendly and it went badly, but OP clearly has shares in the technology.
>>74930402
It was used in the France v Spain game this evening. An offside goal was disallowed and a legit goal was allowed. The opposite would have happened otherwise.
Ignore this faggot >>74930417 He hates progress.
As soon as the side ref raise flag, the team defending shuld immediately stop playing to avoid getting van'ed
How do i find out where/when this will be used next?, shit was funny as fuck
>>74930449
This will unironically start happening.
>>74930572
I wonder what would have happened if Lloris did not dive to save the ball because he saw the flag raised and just stopped
How could you say it's a goal in this case?
>ruining celebrations vs ruining the gam
hmm