Is he innocent?
>>74883120
Absolutely not. They're all retiring because they're guilty as fuck. Can't wait for it all to come out.
>>74883390
House of cards, it's all going to come crumbling down.
Always had my reservations about that team.
My guess is that he's as innocent as Mo Farah. Probably used gray area drugs that are technically legal but also unethical.
>>74883120
>any athlete not using PED
They must have some new drug not yet on the banned list that strips fat without affecting performance. Rupp and Farah are on the same shit. Look how lean they are. Never seen anything like it before. Not even the African distance runners look like that
>>74883572
Looks like a fucking skeleton.
>>74883595
>>74883572
Gross 2bh. Never saw anything like this in long distance running in high school or college in men.
Was Lance Armstrong right when he said it's impossible to win the tour de france without doping?
>>74883943
Maybe for American cyclists.
>>74883943
yes
>>74883943
yes
>>74883572
>>74883595
At this point its safe to assume that all British cyclists are doping.
>>74883572
Fucking belter trash
>>74883943
Yes.
>>74891131
Only one who looks like a human is Cavendish
there's not a single clean athlete at the top level of any sport
>>74883572
this guy produces more watts in any climb than full hematocrite riders who used to ride in the 90s.
When you're better than past cheaters you cannot be clean as water, simple as that.
>>74897386
the doped riders in the 90s didn't have marginal gains
>>74883572
i always wonder if these cyclists have a deal with their girlfriends, like 'ok babe im going to look like a creepy skeleton for the next 6months whilst i do the tour if you don't leave me il buy you a new range rover at the end of it'
>>74883943
Unfortunately yes. Disregard the others, I know my cycling.
If they fix the grand tours like this:
>Shorter stages (min 7 <120km stages)
>No more 4 or 5 mountains in a row.
>Media coverage should be less
>Release all the data
Then it would be possible.
>>74896894
>>74883572
>>74903439
I don't think Froome is doping... then again I thought the same thing about Brad but he obviously was.
So on the basis of that, I'll say Froome probably is on something then. Some sort of technically legal, but morally dubious gear, like this guy said: >>74883506
>>74897386
doping isn't everything, a lot has changed for the better when it comes to training methods and dieting. the russian cross country skiers (those who are clean) these days are better than the former dopers because they actually have a professional team around them now
>>74904345
they told us the same story 15-20 years ago desu.
>>74904423
>>74896672
top post
>>74904839
not an argument
Definitely.
He's cashing in now. Going on Socceram, making tv appearances, milking the Sir.
Because no one will touch him or team sky in 2 years