Why is there virtually no competition for Bayern München in

>>74875281
Ownership structure.

Bayern cripples their rivals by buying their best players.

Bayern have rigged the system in their favour, it's just them and a bunch of farm teams. Media is all ex-Bayern as well, shilling for Bayern 24/7, refs are for Bayern etc. At lot of German teams are very badly managed though or they are well managed but poor and lose all their good players after one season.

Bayern are good at infiltrating any contenders. Whenever a team gets too close, Rummenigge calls on his spy network and sends a detailed pdf file to all other clubs with instructions on how to be whatever club is threatening them. This is well-known in Germany.

>>74875320
*be = beat

>>74875315
so basically Italy and Germany are the same

>>74875337
it's pretty similiar but the big difference is people in germany actually go and watch the games, partly because the stadiums aren't from the 1920's.

>>74875281
first of all, ignore this fool >>74875315

Now, the rise of Bayern began in the 1970s (they only got th promotion to the Bundesliga in the 2nd half of the 1960), when they simply concentrated a lot of talent in their team.
But at this point there were other teams that were more or less on the same level, most notably Mönchengladbach.

But while all the other former clubs lost their dominance over time, Bayern managed to keep it. How?
Well, for one the club is located in one of the wealthiest and economically prosperous regions in Germany and Europe and actually the world. Lots of companies, most notably Adidas, were very helpful in financial matters.
Nowadays not only Adidas, but also Audi and Allianz own shares at Bayern.

Second reason is Uli Hoeneß, he's now a convcted tax evader, but he is without a doubt also one of the most clever, competent football executives the world has ever seen.
He really knows how to make squads good with (relatively) little money and also perfected the art of making your competiton weak and even financially profitting from it (1. buy a player that you don't really need, but who is very important for a competitor team 2. let him play some games for bayern so his market value rises 3. sell him for completely overpriced money to a club that was foolish enough to think that just because that player was under contract with Bayern once, means he's still at that level)

t. Frankfurt fan

>>74875281
bayern gets the best doping
all the other teams get the watered down version from dr. müller-wohlfahrt

>>74875290
This.

>>74875315
And a big dose of this.

>>74875349
A huge difference is the ownership structure. Both Milan clubs are coming back soon due oversees investment which wouldn't be possible on such a scale here.

>>74875416
>Lots of companies, most notably Adidas, were very helpful in financial matters.
That's a cute way to put it, and ignores shady shit like their stadium deal which went far beyond sponsoring. Or stuff like...
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20170202/local/libel-case-over-corruption-claim-dismissed-former-mfa-president.638380
They also support cancer like FFP to keep their position

Buyern is a crime enterprise that'd make Jeep FC proud.

>>74875416
>Now, the rise of Bayern began in the 1970s (they only got th promotion to the Bundesliga in the 2nd half of the 1960), when they simply concentrated a lot of talent in their team.

They also got to rent the new Olympiastadion for a very low price

Informative thread. Thanks bros

>>74875416
Bayern were in pretty bad shape in the late 80s/early 90s, then the whole kirch deal happened where they basically got an enormous bribe (about 80 million €) to get them to accept central marketing of bundesliga tv rights. for german standards, especially in that time period, it's an absurd amount of money which put them up front and which they sell as "the result of 50 years of decent and hard work" to everyone nowadays.