Where would you rank SD as a sports city?

>>74755114
Based. Doesn't have winners but at least it doesn't have cancerous fans.

>>74755114
Above xeattle

>>74755114
Very bottom of all major league cities, above all the minor league cities

>>74755155
>Doesn't have winners but at least it doesn't have fans.
FTFY

>>74755211
Speak for yourself, Aztecs have some of the most rational-minded fans in college sports. The Gulls have the most based hockey fan support and the Dads while they may lag behind in fan support, their fans also are pretty low-key and not plebeian braggarts. The only cancer that comes are transplant cucks.

>>74755114
Despite being a large city, they have one remaining team with 0 championships. The city is good, but as a sports city it may as well be Cleveland.

Above Sacramento

Petco's comfy, but the Dad's suck. SDSU is pretty fun every once in a while. Chargers are gone, kinda sucks because they were fun when they were good.

Shitty venues outside of Petco though. In the end it's kind of hard to have an actual fanbase when 8% of your population is active duty military and even more are family of military and retired military you don't really have as much of a home field advantage, but there are plenty of native San Diegans who are always good, chill fans

In the irrelevant teams but nice city tier

>>74755114
Petco is based and although San Diego doesn't have a good baseball team it's great to go down there and get a $15 ticket and sneak behind home plate because no one is there all while enjoying some Phil's BBQ. Gulls are whatever but I don't like going to that shitshack arena. Only spics are sad that the chargers moved but at least we're getting some soccer p.soon. San Diego is based/10

>>74755295
>amateur sports
>minor league furpuck
>shitty baseball team

lmao, even Cleveland is a better sports city

>>74755838
At least San Diego doesn't have blowhards like Cleveshit