Best strikers of this century power rankings

1. ronaldo
2. bati
3. sheva
4. henry
5. suarez
6. etoo

no Drogba?

File: IMG_1273.jpg (71KB, 656x369px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 656x369px

>>74433397
For shame.

No Drogba, no Shevchenko, no Owen, no Rooney, no Inzaghi, no Vieri... bad list.

>>74433397
>9.- Diego Forlan

>aguero higher than villa, ruud and suárez
suárez is literally top 3 better than the fraud henry

>>74433397
>forlan over suarez
>falcao over suarez
>villa over suarez
>aguero over suarez
>torres over suarez

AYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

>>74433397
What a terrible list.

>>74433397

1=. Harry Kane
1=. Jamie Vardy

POWER GAP

Over 9000. Everyone else

>>74433578
ha ha over 9000 i get that joke!!

>>74433547
are you suarez bitch by any chance?

File: sucy very wide smug.jpg (44KB, 600x570px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 600x570px

>>74433397
>9.- Diego Forlan

>>74433608
No, but he's right. The only strikers this century on Suarez's level are Henry and Shevchenko.

Not even Ronaldo, this century means the fat, post injury version of him.

>>74433397
>falcao that high
>di natale is 404
Wot?

> no Ronaldinho Gaúcho
> no Zlatan Ibrahimović
Lads...

>>74433495
> Owen
> Inzaghi
> les sit on bench until min 75 and then tap it in men
Even Luca Toni deserves a place more than these two.

>le messi and penaldo aren't strikers meme

>no alex mineiro
>no martin palermo
OP confirmed for pleb.

>>74433587
I'm a professional memester

>>74433693
the fat post injury ronaldo who won single handedly a world cup?

>Drogba, Sheva and Bati didn't play in the liga
>nowhere in sight
really makes you think

File: 1479495844289_0.jpg (14KB, 358x358px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 358x358px

>>74433397
>Radamel Falcao

>>74434001
Miguel Borja >>>>>>> Flacao

File: Ronaldospaghetti.webm (1MB, 788x436px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 788x436px

>>74433998
>single handedly
fucking kill yourself, he wasn't even the best player on the team

>>74433397
>Suarez worse then Villa, Forlan, Torres, Agüero

absolute fucking top kek

>>74434069
I can cherry pick too. Remember when Messi missed the wide open shot against Germany before Half Time?

>>74433998
Uh.. Rivaldo?

File: NBeqW9h.jpg (79KB, 1080x1323px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1080x1323px

Why are you you niggas hating on my main eto'o?

>no Shearer
lol

>>74434146
Nah, Rivaldo was great, but he worked behind Ronaldo level's, for sure. Like Suarez-Messi today.

>agüero that high
>torres that high
>suárez that low

>>74434069
there's no need to pull out a webm m8. everyone can watch the whole game on youtube.

The Real List.
1. Fatnaldo
2. Eto'o
3. Suarez
4. Henry
5. Batigol
6. Shevchenko
7. Vieri
8. Ibrahimovic
9. Drogba
10. Lewankdowski

how does /sp/ manage to forget that messi was one of if not the dominant striker in the world for like 6 years?? disgraceful

1. Ronaldo
2. Henry
3. Suarez
4. Shevchenko
5. Eto'o
6. Villa
7. Drogba
8. Ibrahimovic
9. Lewandowski
10. van Nistelrooy

>>74434138
>Wide open spot
If you think that was a wide open shot or an easy shot you're an idiot
Higuain had the wide open easy shot and Palacio to a lesser extent who just had to tap it between wide open German legs instead of trying to chip it over a giant two feet away from you wtf just thinking about it

ronaldo the br one, was never better than henry or suarez

>>74434474
>australian shitposting

>>74434474
shitposters the aus ones, was never better than leaf or sharts

File: Aguero Copa America.webm (3MB, 816x344px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 816x344px

>>74433397
>Aguero
>5
>Torres on that list

>>74433397
>aguero on top of suarez

I believe suarez deserves to be higher than even villa as since villa had a stacked team that make him look good,

suarez has proved himself internationaly with a shit uruguay team and in two league, Aguero wasnt outtstanding in atletico .

Also henry was a joke in Barca and for france

dont even know whol nazzario is

1. Suarez
2. villa
3.Lewandoski
4. nilsteroy
5. forlan
6. aguero
7. Henry

>>74434138
messi was in a shit angle and neuer position was perfect near his near post

>>74434731
da fuck is this nigger doing?

>>74434171
Rivaldo's performance has become so overrated.

People love to mention Ronaldo's misses in the first half but ignore the fact Rivaldo was literally invisible in that game.

The whole Rivaldo > Ronaldo shit seems to come from that England game where Ronaldo did nothing.

>>74434171
I'm just saying that ronaldo didn't won the WC single handledly

He was the best player but Rivaldo helped a lot

>>74433693
>Shitchenko

Lol he was shit with Chelsea and choked so fucking hard to a mediocre luck ridden Livershit in the CL final.

To be top 10 OAT, you need to perform GOAT-levels in every league or club you go to

File: charles_barkley.jpg (99KB, 662x436px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 662x436px

>>74433397
>no Klose

>>74433608
Why are you upset? its facts macaco.

>>74433397
>aguero
>torres
>forlan

Replace with Inzaghi, Shevchenko, and Suarez, respectively. Drogba for 10

No raul?

>>74434781
>>74434344
>>74434268
>lewandowski anywhere near this list

>>74434781
this niggas is especially retarded

1. Ronaldo
2. Etoo
3. Henry
4. Suarez
5. Villa
6. Drogba
7. Falcao
8. Shevchenko
9. Aguero
10. Ibra

>>74435150
Raúl was the best at nothing, but good at everything. Toni, Palermo, Van Nistelrooy, Vieri, Ronaldinho etc. were better strikers than him, but Raúl was unique in his completeness.

>>74440714
>held record for most CL goals before Messi and Ronaldo
Yeah but he was only good

>>74440714
>ronaldinho
>striker

you wot m8

File: Screen Shot 2016-11-30 at 6.36.03 AM.png (204KB, 444x420px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 444x420px

No drogba?

1. Lewa
2. Żurawski
3. Milik
4. Frankowski
5. Smolarek
(the rest)

>>74440837
Fellow Pole confirming. You can't say they weren't the best because you don't them

>>74440954
I can say they're not the best because they play it a shitty league and yet still don't outscore people like Suarez

>>74440987
>scoring in la liga/epl
>scoring in any relevant league
Wew

>>74440766
>Le miss easy shitter but score clutch goals to make it up man

>>74441004
I haven't even heard of the other strikers outside from Lewondowski I guess that's my mistake, but
>epl

>>74441078
>Haven't heard of Smolarek
Do you even/bundes/?

>Samuel Eto'o over Henry
'no'

>>74441153
I don't watch 1 team leagues

>>74433495
>Drogba
>Doesn't even have a 1 in 2 goalscoring record
how bout no

>>74440745
Ronaldinho is actually fat Ronaldo. No pun intended.

If they don't have at least a 1:1 ratio they shouldn't even be mentioned

>>74441215
The "real" Ronaldinho is Ronaldinho Gaúcho. Just to clear up

>>74441232
So... Cristiano Ronaldo?

>>74441273
>510 in 703
Great math

File: 1453441208485.jpg (42KB, 269x239px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 269x239px

>>74441173

>I don't watch 1 team leagues
>probably fucking a lel liga fanboi

>>74441232

I don't think any player after the 1950s have a 1:1 record

>>74441289
La Liga right now had the closest title race of any league

>>74441299
Then why are we discussing post 1950 players?

>>74441288
>387 in 378 for Real Madrid

>>74441305
Because football was amateur back then. I mean shit, even with Pele's "1000" goals, atleast a third of them were friendlies.

>>74441312
So the rest of his career doesn't count? I guess people listing Forlan, Raul and Ronaldo are also wrong because those players are shit now

>>74441321
What exactly are you trying to argue here? 1:1 is nearly impossible as a striker. Most lads don't even get that in Sunday League.

>>74441234
yfw prime Ronaldo is also prime Ronaldinho

>>74441300

>one single year it's actually true

>>74441331
This is the 4th season in a row that it's true. 12/13 was the last time the La Liga title was decided before the final matchday

>>74441327
I'm saying we should have higher standards
>>74441331
For all you know I've only started watching La Liga this season and so what I said is true

>>74441364
and im saying you've made your shitposting quotient for the day and you can stop talking about things you know nothing about

>>74441419
As long as I can get attention the quote is never full :^)

>>74441173
>1 team
Underage detected. There were times not so long ago when HSV and Stuttgart were destroying buyerns

Not saying he should definitely be on a list, but everyone forgetting how nice Crespo was at finishing. Also Raul.

>Aguero

Not Milito. The amount of plebbetry is palpable.

>>74433397
1. Ronaldo Nazario
2. Luis Suarez
3. Samuel Eto'o
4. Thierry Henry
5. Alessando Del Piero
6. Fernando Torres
7. Andriy Shevchenko
8. Alan Shearer
9. Falcao
10. David Villa

Honourable mentions: Gabriel Batistuta, Cristiano Ronaldo, Ruud Van Nistelrooy, Michael Owen, Edison Cavani (seriously), Diego Forlan, Kun Aguero, Raul, Henrik Larsson, Didier Drogba

>>74441496
Why do people rate Torres so much. If you want a guy that is huge in numbers but scored important goals then Drogba is superior

>>74441515
Torres at his peak was almost unplayable, m8. Fat Ronaldo levels of acceleration, confidence and marksmanship

>>74441515
>Drogba
>huge in numbers
His goalscoring record is mediocre at best for a player held in such high regard

>>74441496
This is best list

1. Ronaldo Nazario
2. Thierry Henry
3. Luis Suarez
4. Zlatan Ibrahimovic
5. Samuel Eto'o
6. Sergio Aguero
7. Raul
8. Falcao
9. Fernando Torres
10. Diego Forlan

1. Ronaldo
2. Suarez
3. Eto'o
4. Ibra
5. Klose
6. Raul
7. Henry
8. Shevchenko
9. David Villa
10. Van Nistelrooy

Aguero, Falcao, Forlan, Milito, Torres, Drogba, Lewa, and Tevez just miss the list.

>>74433397

>Eto'o at 2
Already a good list

Missing Shevchenko though

Villa criminally underrated as always(but everyone does)

Torres' peak a bit too short for me

Aguero, Falcao, and Ruud were flat track bullies
but still merit a spot on this list. Ibra too for the same reason

Why are people rating Eto'o so highly? He only had one season of his entire career where he scored more than 30 league goals.

>>74441594
Numbers aren't everything. Don't turn this into baseball. Sometimes just an eye test is enough. and Eto'o had several years at an amazing level of play. Both with Barca and Inter.

It's why I refuse to put Cavani on any list, or call Chicharito the best striker in CONCACAF.

>>74441594

You won't find many players who scored 30 or more goals in just the league regularly. Ronaldo only did it twice and Henry only once. Shevchenko never did it.

>>74441594
It's not like 30 league goals is something that top strikers do every season. Henry only had 1 as well, Shevchenko never achieved that.

>>74441594
>only including league goals
Yeah, cause scoring against Real Madrid in the league is not equal to scoring against them in Copa del Rey or La Liga

>>74441594
He won that treble Yernited likes to go on about back to back with two different teams. I don't think anyone else's ever done it

>>74433397
Very very biased list desu

>no Messi

>>74434409
>>74434811
lmaooooooooooooooooo

>>74441589
>klose
>ameristats

>>74441765
>Messi is a striker

>>74441765
>

>>74441848
He played as a striker until Suarez

>>74441855
No he didn't mate

>>74441855
no, no he didn't

>>74441855
>he doesn't know the difference between a striker and a false 9

1. Suarez
2. Henry
3. Shevchenko
4. Eto'o
5. Ronaldo
6. Ibrahimovic
7. Villa
8. Torres
9. Falcao
10. Drogba

Ronaldo is clearly not the best striker if we don't include the 90s. I have no idea why is he considered the consensus #1 ITT.

'striker' is a blurry term. Just like 'forward', it can mean a 9 or it can be generous and mean a 7, 10, a false 9, a fucking 11..

I'm too much of an educated high-class purist to participate in this utter bollocks non-sensical mob thread.

>>74445587
>españa

>>74441776
What's the problem, spic?

>>74433495
>300k per week golden goy
>shot knees
>offside man

File: intellectual.jpg (31KB, 615x410px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 615x410px

>no England's brave Wayne Rooney