It's settled then.

>>74162209
>#1pg
number 1 play getter is messi
>#1sg
number one score getter is ronaldo
>#1sf
number one senter forward is harry kane
>#1pf
number one penalty finder is pedro
>#1 c
number one cunt is suarez

Best by Position is redundant in basketball where the stats are all the same. Kareem is the goat, next question.

>not based dirk

>>74162265
> (you)

>>74162276
>dick over duncan
not in a million years

>>74162209
That's correct but having Lebron and Magic on the same team is redundant since they do the same thing. If we're being practical you replace one of them with Larry Bird.

>>74162315
Magic then, bird is a better 3 point shooter and defender than magic.

>>74162315
Where does it say they'd be playing together? All it says is "best by position".

>>74162209
>PG is a power forward who couldn't guard PGs
>SF is a small forward who plays point guard and guards power forwards
>PF is a center that only played as a PF in the first seasons of his career back when David Robinson was a thing

what would be the true "best by position" if we followed pure roles?

>>74162209
>that lack of 3pt shooting

warriors would sweep them 4-2

File: image.0.0.jpg (170KB, 1310x873px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1310x873px

>>74162730
this

best by position are the players who won the most games in a season, literally undebatable

PG would be Curry. Magic is good but not as much of a team player and wouldn't mesh well

SF would be Bird, Lebron is a choker

PF is wrong, Garnett, Malone, and Dirk all have cases. Dirk and Malone would be especially valuable as shooters, and Garnett is a better defender than Duncan

SG and C are correct. This team would be deadly in terms of defense, perimter shooting, and passing, no one could stop them.

>>74162262
when are you guys going to invent some new sports, you're lagging behind by at least 3

>>74162209

I still have Larry over LeBron, maybe its cause I dont put much stock in those Miami rings as everyone one else.

A ring this year would cement him as top SF of all time though imo

How about the 2nd best at each position?

Stockton, Kobe, Bird, seem like sure picks. Who you got at 4 and 5? I'd take Dirk and Shaq if we're playing a game, overall greatness I'd take Garnett and Russell.

Curry > Magic desu

Magic is just a way less athletic lebron who cant play defense, he would get killed if he played PG in the modern NBA

I'd take MVP era Steve Nash for pure style over substance reasons.

File: 1486137342265.png (496KB, 485x544px) Image search: [Google]

496KB, 485x544px

>Jabbar over Hakeem, Shaq, Wilt, Rodman, Ben...

>>74162720
PG: Stockton
SG: Jordan
SF: Erving
PF: McHale/Dirk
C: Shaq/Wilt/Russell/Alcindor

>>74162209
>Kareem over Wilt

Wilt at 35 years on one leg fucking humiliated Kareem.

>>74163304
oh fuck off

Shaq > *

>* centers

Hakeem Olajuwon is the greatest center of all-time

>>74162209
Is Kareem wearing shell toe adidas with no ankle support? lol

PG: Magic
SG: Jordan
SF: Bird
PF: Duncan
C: Hakeem

File: p.jpg (153KB, 766x431px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 766x431px

>>74162209
>implying

>>74163029
>PF is wrong, Garnett, Malone, and Dirk all have cases. Dirk and Malone would be especially valuable as shooters, and Garnett is a better defender than Duncan

t. babby who didn't watch the 2003 playoffs

File: i.png (114KB, 350x254px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 350x254px

#1 SF should be pic related

>>74167414
eventually, but not yet

rating by best and not greatest:

>PG
CP3

>SG
MJ

>SF
Lebron

>PF
TD

>C
Hakeem/Shaq

>>74162262
terrible

Mine would be
>Curry
>Jordan
>Lebron
>Duncan
>Wilt

File: Capture.png (383KB, 397x558px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 397x558px

>>74167612
>Curry
>Not Westbrook

>>74166788
Who knows how they do against real competition.

File: BRADY by position.jpg (67KB, 600x300px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 600x300px

>>74162209
fixed it for you OP