Put some percentages on this

>>73994258
>Las Vegas?
15% and dropping fast. The longer it doesn't happen the more likely a pissed off Sheldon Adelson has blacklisted them from Vegas
>Los Angeles?
Exactly zero. Two teams are already there. The owners won't allow anyone else to move there.
>San Diego?
Minimal, maybe 0.1%? San Diego couldn't convince their team to stay with their offer so I highly doubt they'll make a different team move with the exact same thing.
>San Antonio?
0.1%. Jerry Jones would shoot it down faster than he'd shoot down a fat chick
>Stay in Oakland with a new stadium?
Very low, not because of Oakland but because of the new stadium caveat. There's no sign of that happening there any time soon.
>Share with the 49ers
Zero unless they get a new stadium in the Bay Area and need a temporary stadium to play in while it's being built. It makes too much sense and would've happened already if it was ever going to.
>die as a franchise?
0%.

Overall I'd say it's about an 80% chance they get stuck in the Oakland Coliseum for the foreseeable future, but that won't stop the rumor mill from propositioning that the team should move anywhere from Las Vegas to St. Louis to Mexico City to the goddamn Moon.

>>73994258
At this point Marky Mark needs to fucking man up and deal with the reality that he doesn't have the money or the connections to act like a major player. If he wants to do anything besides tread water he has to give up some of the team, because it's the only fucking thing he has.

I think the best case scenario is try and get a deal to play at Santa Clara while he fundraises, a new stadium for whenever the Warriors finish theirs. Perhaps he should just take them on the road, call them the California Raiders, play half the home game at Santa Clara and the other half in sand diego

Why are Oakland Raider fans ok with having the team play in Santa Clara and not LA/SD/Vegas?

They're still gone from Oakland

>>73994577
A's are announcing a new stadium later this year. Maybe the Raiders will have complete control over the Coliseum site.

>>73994258
What are the odds of the LA raidnigger spic making this same thread tomorrow

>>73994669
because they'd still be close enough to keep the "Oakland Raiders" name

>>73994748
100%

>>73994258
100%

San Antonio checking in. Saints played a few games at the Alamodome during the 2005 season, and it could be brought up to NFL standards for a comparatively small amount of money. So the good news is we have the infrastructure. The bad news is we have to deal with Jerry Jones.

>>73994643
Why should the raiders have to play in Santa Clara?

I think San Antonio will get the Raiders