Straight guys looking for gay best friends

Are asian and black males the most homophobic group?

>>22971455
Been there done that guy friends are clock blocks and always push boundaries

Leave your contact information below and your interest and where you're from

>>22971467
I'm not lol in the best wing man ever

>>22971466
And idk i think it depends on how you're raised. It's mostly white people who i thibk are the most homophobic

I have a little story about a straight guy I've met on 4chan and me.
If there is enough interest I will post it.

>>22971523
If it's not bullshit go ahead

>>22971455
why the fuck would you want specificaly a queer friend? so he can suck your dick when ur sad?

>>22971455
Gay guys give the best advice on girls and they'll never try to steal them.

Someone mentioned boundaries, but that depends on how respectful one is to each other. Please, let's not assume all of us, gay guys, are that needy or desperate. We value friendship as do straight, bi, and all other gender way ones can call themselves.

>>22972572
I've had really good gay friends, don't be a dick be a dude.

>>22974120
Mfw im the gay friend who gives solid advice to my friends and doesn't try to blow them

>>22971455
Straight guy here. Lived in a flat share with a gay dude for a few months (not friends, no nothing, found out he's a homo a couple of months after he moved in).

In less than one year the constant displeasure and disgust of living with that faggot (as in the most cliche, textbook, flamboyant faggot you can imagine) led me to understand why right wing fascist policies were so popular in the 1st half of the 20th century. If the new Adolf shows up tomorrow and promises to cleanse society (which incidentally is impossible and thus, a lie) I will simply vote for him/tolerate him, because the idea of a future clean society was my last resort (or rather last method to remain somewhere within sanity limits) before starting to stab that homo in the neck (with an improvised shiv or something).

In conclusion: after having the misfortune to see a homo up close on an almost daily basis, my... world views shifted towards the far right. Not even religious (couldn't give a fuck of what Jews approved in their holy texts or not, and hence regurgitated/recycled by Christians everywhere), just... disgusted.

File: 9a8d5e5b-ca3e-4b5e-92ec-68d58cf77947..jpg (43KB, 500x314px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x314px

>>22974714

Every gay friend I've ever had has made numerous attempts to try to fuck me (ended up making out with a few, but felt no arousal). I don't hold it against them, given the fact that dudes will be dudes; however, I find that things always become awkward at some point.

>>22974792
Stop making out with dudes and maybe they'll stop thinking you're up for fucking.

>>22974791
I'm a cunt because I've realised I strongly dislike homos. OK...

>>22974877
Fair enough; however, in each case, there had already been numerous attempts (usually while drunk), and I just figured I'd humor a few of them with a short make-out; at which point I would tell them that I wasn't into it and not to do it again.

Dudes being dudes, we'd get drunk again and they'd try it again. I can relate to this scenario being a male myself -- give us an inch and we'll take a mile.

File: FriendsForLife.jpg (61KB, 960x743px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 960x743px

>>22974888

What about bi men?

>>22974888
>strongly dislike homos
>want's another Hitler to cleanse society of them
That's quite a leap there, pal.

>this one time, I lived with a bitchy mexican and now I want them all exterminated

I have a gay best friend. Didn't know he was gay for 3 years. Just a regular kind of dude. I will say that the boundaries thing has bothered me occasionally throughout the years. Did I mention I let him blow me when we smoke weed? Whatever.

>>22974916
I am not naive. I'm perfectly aware you cannot just have a Hitler who does whatever it is one imagines should be done to "clean" society. Ultimately Hitler did whatever the fuck he wanted, not what others believed he will do... As I said before, this clean up is impossible, so I just keep my distance. The abstract idea of a gay person doesn't really bother me (again, using religious grounds for something like this is ridiculous). Seeing one (or two, or three, etc) in person does start to get out the "4chan" in me (and yes, this is how I call my irrational intolerance towards queers: going 4chan on people).

>inb4 living with a homo for the almost a year
I thought as myself as a rational person with very mild views about the world. I guess each one has his/her own limits...

>>22974919
That is a good friend. Sometimes you just need a dick to suck, and it's always nice when I friends let's you borrow his.

File: 15b4ce8f-8429-4ad2-8176-f91fb1c6d4ab..jpg (43KB, 700x609px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 700x609px

>>22974934

>>22974941
I'm from Yurop. Fedoras don't apply here. This is a retarded meme invented by murricans for murricans.

>>22974934
In all fairness, I understand where you're coming from regarding the often narcissistic flamboyance -- basically, many gay men embody some of the worst qualities in females and then exaggerate them (compensation for the fact they don't have a vagoo, perhaps), much in the same way dykes often exaggerate male characteristics to the point where they almost become parody.

Having that said, there's a difference between generally not getting along with a particular group or ethnicity (which is OK, despite what the bleeding-hearts want us to think), and hating them.

>>22974973
Not really hating them either, just... disgusted. Tried to think what exactly is it that makes me dislike them so much. It's not necessarily the fact that they fuck each other in the ass (I actually believe they're more fascinated with cocks than with asses) but rather this kind of fucked-up cvasi-female (or bitch) behaviour. It surrounds them like a cloud and pollutes everything around them.

Also, they managed to taint male friendship and camaraderie forever. It will always have crap homoerotic overtures, no matter how much we try to ignore it, because we're all trained through repetition (in any form of modern media) to expect it.

>>22974934
>>22974973
>>22975011

You both have a warped perception of homosexuality, and it seems to be that it's that which the media has fed you. More often than not, most homosexuals don't even get the light of day in the media simply because they go unnoticed and live their lives as many others do.

The media strives on controversy, and it's those who shout the loudest (the flamboyant queens) who get the most attention. You need only go to /fit/ to realise some are bi/gay and even they struggle socially, let alone get a journalist to write about them.

>>22975011

> It will always have crap homoerotic overtures

How can this possibly be the case when females cuddle and sleep with one another (non-sexually), and it have no homoerotic tone to it? Your argument is limited to male homosexuals, and the fact that 'bromance' had (or has) adopted a mini-subculture of its own.

>>22975014
See: >>22974792
I've had many gay friends throughout my life -- I played music at a drag-queen fashion show at the Andy Warhol museum, for Christs sake. I probably have known more gay men than most gay men

>>22975025
>they go unnoticed and live their lives as many others do
But then I wouldn't even know they're gay so I wouldn't care. Unfortunately the only queers I've seen around here are very "loud"/visible version (clothes, attitude, pro-diversity bracelets, even fucking pro-diversity email signatures in their corporate email signatures). They really want to rub it in your face (no pun intended) but they seem to have nothing else going on for them except that they like cocks and everyone else is supposed to see what a special (with a lisp) and unique snowflake each one of them is. It is very hard to tolerate a group that has no apparent useful/redeeming qualities, but somehow they must parade their "pride" for... not sure what for. You don't see physicists' parade, you don't see social worker's parade, you don't barely see military parades anymore. But somehow mediocre faggots get to parade because it's so special to like cock. (Disclaimer: roughly 50 percent of the population is supposed to like cock anyway. They're called women. They just get abuse all over the place, from the West to Shitholistan, but they don't get parades...)

>>22975011

You do realize that most gay guys aren't flamboyant and you'd never know they liked dudes unless they told you?

Even though I'm pretty sure you're trolling.

>>22975096

Why do subject yourself to pride parades?
You do know you have to actually manipulate your body into walking to go to those things?

Once again, pretty sure you're trolling.

Regardless, you're opinions mean very little.

>>22975096

So, you're not wanting to cleanse the world of homosexuality as your disgust lies with flamboyant, camp, loud, and annoying individuals. It's a 'type' of male homosexual often referred to as 'flamer'. Flamers aren't popular within the LGBT+ community (with those who are sane and intelligent anyway) because it means the rest of the community just gets lambasted with negative comments deriving from media publications on such flamers. Thus, to those outside the community, all they see of the LGBT+ community is 'flamers', so then the following logic applies:

Media portrayal of LGBT+ community as flamers + you see this portrayal = everyone in the LGBT+ community must be flamers.

They're usually hated anyway. I'm not homosexual myself, but I dislike them because, similar to what you say ('nothing else going on for them except that they like cocks'), this being that they seem to have zero personality and a life that revolves around being a total bottom queen.

I wholly disagree with any form of 'Pride' because, to me, to be proud of your sexuality is something that is unnecessary. I have brown eyes, and that is also one aspect of me, should I be proud? No. It happened without choice, and I couldn't care less. I didn't mind parades to raise awareness and fight for rights, or what they later became: a backlash to social repression. Now it's just an excuse to get half-naked, drunk, high, and hookup with strangers.

>>22975099

This is a point I made too. Most LGBT+ people go unnoticed.

>>22975099
>You do realize that most gay guys aren't flamboyant
Yup. It's called being civilised. It's called discretion. But almost inevitably you know a dude is gay only because he chooses to shout it out loud through all non-verbal means possible.

>>22975115

I think discretion is probably the wrong word as it almost implies that non-heterosexual people make an effort to conceal their sexuality. Flamboyant doesn't go hand-in-hand with male homosexuals. I've encountered camp and flamboyant male heterosexuals too.

>>22975099
This may be true from your own personal experiences, but if you were to examine the gay population as a whole, you'd most certainly find that stereotypes begin to develop (like any other group of people). And those stereotypes tend to include qualities such as varying levels of flamboyance and a certain petulant behavior that is intrinsically female. Also, gay men are prone to a different brand of pretentiousness that the rest of the male population is not.

I think it would be very intellectually dishonest to espouse the usual bleeding-heart drivel that "people are people and we're all the same".

Also, it's worth noting that I'm not exactly on this guy's >>22975096 side, so I hope you don't misinterpret what I'm saying as vitriolic.

File: image.jpg (956KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

956KB, 2048x2048px

19/M/Seattle/Gay

Looking for chill people to meet and hang out with. Into theatrical drama, meditation/yoga, cute guys, politics, spirituality, the occult, reading studying history, mythology, uh yeah my mind is fried right now so idk.

Kik is HariSkanda

This thread is hilarious. I'm actually a National Socialist and Hitler would have done no such thing. We are fed bullshit lies by the Jewish media who go out of their way to paint him as a tyrannical monster every chance they get. The flamboyant gay stereotype is what the Jewish media wants us to be all we are worth. Homosexuals are worth so much more than that. Since natural reproduction is not in our nature, although still possible, our role as homosexuals are to be the protectors, preservers and warriors for the future generations to come. Just take a look at the ancient Greeks and Romans. Look at pederasty in ancient Greece. Look at the Sacred Band of Thebes, those were real warriors. That is what a gay man should be, not some "pinko fag" who waves his little pathetic rainbow flag around.

Pic is me.

>>22975154
Wow, you're all over the map there, kid.

I'm not exactly advocating this, but go over to /pol/ or any other nationalist forum and tell them about your cute little theory about how it's the JEWS who are the ones who want to besmirch homosexuals -- I certainly don't condone their overt bigotry, yet when it concerns their thoughts on Jews and their obsession with diversity shilling, I must give credit where it's due.

Yet, ITT are the typical schizophrenic lines that are directed at anyone that comments on gay stereotypes -- that they're just ignorant bigots. Context is always important and just because someone happens to make an observation from personal experience or otherwise does not mean they're "attacking" gays, or blacks, or whatever special interest hugbox you're a part of

>>22975217
>/pol/
>National Socialism

pick one

Hitler had gays in his ranks. Thousands of fucking men and all of them were straight? toplel. That is hilarious.

You do realize anti homosexuality is strictly a Jewish trait in nature and they project it onto the masses? They know our strength and potential which is why they attack us in their stupid Talmudic texts.

Liberal indoctrinated homos who are pretty much the equivalent to edgy feminists aren't homos. They are empty vessels that carry nothing. No purpose.

>>22975231
Perhaps I didn't articulate that very well: I meant "pol/other forums that tend to cater to the same bigotry"

/pol/ doesn't know what the hell it is; all they THINK they know is that Jews are responsible for every societal transgression, and that it's the Jews who promote every aspect of diversity because of an obsession with open-mindedness (the latter of which, I agree).

I'm no expert on Hitler, but I do know that he was obsessed with exterminating all forms of degeneration, which obviously would have included homosexuals -- after all, it's a physiological abnormality, no matter how you look at it.

While Hitler may have had gays in his ranks, I highly doubt he was aware, or would have condoned it; however, if you could link proof of the contrary, I'd be interested to see it.

>>22975231
May I suggest you read some history before spouting nonsense?

>Hitler had gays in his ranks.
And? If they were discovered they would barely get past the "preliminary" Gestapo interrogatory. Nothing spelled betrayal more than people in their ranks being ousted as actually belonging to the "wrong" category (gays, jews, etc).

Your argument is along the lines of "they are gays in Saudi Arabia" therefore it's a jewish conspiracy, that's why they all hate gays.

Also, don't mistake dislike of "gaydom" (and the inevitable accompanying traits) for bullshit religious (or pseudo-religious, or even worse, pseudo-scientific) arguments.

>Just take a look at the ancient Greeks and Romans. Look at pederasty in ancient Greece.
Actually the ancient Romans were quite allergic to womanly traits in men (being pederast included, but not only; it extending to comfort, luxury, having too much HETEROsexual intercourse, and so on). Please don't mix the early, frugal ascetic Romans with what was later associated with Hellenistic/"oriental" traits. They were almost as crazy as modern-day murricans: always afraid of effeminacy and the doom it would spell.

As for greeks: some liked to fuck in the ass, whatever. It was mostly a very complicated social game, a way to enforce and show hierarchy: tops were generally old, rich(er), powerful (in the political sense) men, while the bottoms were teenagers, twinks, slaves, people generally still (or forever) low on the social ladder. It was a master/slave, master/apprentice, powerful/relation all the way. Roman men expressed this through their obsession for public symbols and respect. Greek men generally expressed this by fucking each other in the ass.

>>22975279
>Also, don't mistake dislike of "gaydom" (and the inevitable accompanying traits) for bullshit religious (or pseudo-religious, or even worse, pseudo-scientific) arguments.
No this is exactly where it stems from. From their Talmudic texts, to the Old Testament now in the form of political ideologies. The thing you don't understand is, it started with an idea, a spiritual one and over the centuries manifested itself into the physical.

>womanly traits in men
Hahahaha, where in any of my posts was I advocating for 'womanly traits'?

mfw all this Kosher nonsense itt

i had a straight friend from 4chan
he used to be really nice and i used to have a huge crush on him, he even said he'd fuck me if we ever met (but now he pretends like he never said that so whatever)
he disappeared for a few months, and when he came back he basically went full retard, saying he wanted to become a bhuddist monk after reading "way of the samurai" like once, but then goes around fucking girls and getting drunk ever night, says he wants to be a "hero of justice, but then he turns around and starts spouting some neo nazi /pol/int/ inspired bullshit and even shitmakes a youtube video in a shitty plastic guy fawkes mask... worst part is no matter how retarded he acts i can't help but remember when he used to be a cool guy and try my best to be supportive of him

>>22974714
well, sometimes people are just annoying assholes, gay people are just people like others and can be disgusting