Is math better explained in shapes or numbers?

>>9168592
What is this?

>>9168606
Just another (k)not theorist meming about his irrelevant field.

>>9168592
I think using meaningful shapes is better than using arbitrary placeholder symbols (numbers being the latter) because that Daniel Tammet autist can effortlessly calculate by imagining pictures, and as far as I know he's the only savant who has a verified approach to how he does what he does that he's able to describe and reliably reproduce (e.g. he was tested by being asked to make his imagination of different random numbers using clay and then called back in at a later date and asked to make the same numbers to make sure his shapes were consistent and not just made up on the spot).

>>9168611

>he has never tied up a q.t. π in shibari in front of an audience including other cute thin young things who suddenly want your dick while they're all tied up

>>9168592
What do the numbers in superscript and subscript represent?

>>9168647
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knot_tabulation

(p,q)-torus knots best knots

>>9168666
I could have googled that myself, I wanted you to explain it to me :(

>>9168693
Time to read and figure it out yourself, brainlet.

I can barely tie my shoes lmao