Just solved the Yang–Mills existence and mass gap problem

>>9167121
no its not
you forgot a *-1

>>9167121
Actually, it's 5.9999 repeating. Close though :)

>>9167143
Isn't 5.9999 repeating equal to 6.

>>9167121
Just mailed Clay Institute about the awnser
now the million dollars are mine

>>9167803
No, it's just a bit short. Most people just round up and act like they're equivalent (engineers mostly).

>>9168170
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.999...

>>9168197
This has to be the absolute worst board for people getting jokes. I thought /sci/ was smart.

>>9168206

>website pandering to 15-21 demographic
>smart

No, it's filled with narcissistic assholes like you.

According to the numerical solver I quickly wrote I got 5.8 +- 0.3.

>>9168227
why did you write +-

Math-ew!!!

>>9168898
Please, go be a brainlet somewhere else.

>>9167121

Hi Francine.

>>9168197
So Wikipedia is wrong. Big surprise.

>>9168197
what a shittily-written article.

American Dad lolol

>>9168206
>a website for autists with no social skills
>the most spergtastic board on the website for autists with no social skills
nobody here laughs at jokes. we derive all pleasure from one-ups-manship and being correct, especially technically correct. being technically correct is the best kind of correct.