Did this guy seriously fucking invent his own mathematics to

did homo sapien sapien?

File: Untitled.png (408KB, 736x1124px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 736x1124px

>when your colleague gives his own exposition of the proof but the theorems themselves are still over a page long

http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~gokun/DOCUMENTS/abc_ver6.pdf

File: Untitled.png (325KB, 748x964px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 748x964px

>The proposition immediately follows from the described algorithms.

does anyone actually think he isn't a hack?

>>9166988
>does anyone actually think he isn't a hack?
me

>>9166988
>does anyone actually think he isn't a hack?
he is a much better mathematician than you are

File: thats stupid.png (13KB, 335x318px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 335x318px

>>9166988
He's right, and you're wasting your time posting on a Malaysian Trout Fishing Imageboard

>>9166639
>claims to be right
>writes proof with undergrad tier "obviously it follows" claims
>proof vague enough to be impenetrable
>refuses to explain himself

"such an esoteric genius"

if your proof cant convince a clear-headed idiot, it's not a proof.

>>9167194
t. brainlet

>>9167016
and i'm much better at having sex than mochizuki

>>9167681
that's probably not even true
mochizuki would get as much pussy as he wanted if he wanted

>>9167729
He is virgin

>>9167194
>>writes proof with undergrad tier "obviously it follows" claims
proof: think

>>9167734
>if he wanted

>>9166988
I mean, the rest of his work was pretty good

>>9166641
>Let ... l be a prime number
>We assume l and p are odd
Stopped reading here. What a brainlet.

>>9167734
Source?

>>9167681
>caring about sex and being proud of it

found the woman

>>9168038
>>Let ... l be a prime number
>>We assume l and p are odd
>Stopped reading here. What a brainlet.
What exactly is the issue?

I think that his math is the limit of human brain and that we will need some super-nootropic or cybernetic implant to go any further, shit is getting clearly too complex to follow. Too many shit has to be in your head interconnected at the same time,

>>9168166
Well by gradually integrating all the skill components required for the proof in long term memory and perfect memorization of all the vocabulary/procedure, the strain on working memory should be tolerable.

>>9168038
Imagine being so retarded you forgot that 2 was a number.

>>9166641
>>9166648
I wonder how long it took him to write that paper all in tex

>>9168254
Maybe 5 years research and 15 years write it

>>9168064
unmarriage begin over 40 years old, enter princeton with 16 Y.O

>>9166639
That's what you have to do..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems

>>9166648
>those function names
how much LSD is this motherfucker smoking

>>9168038
? are you alright

>>9166639
etale-cohomology is not a "new math"

>>9166639
Algebraic Geometry is nothing new.

>>9167194
if the sentences are true/satisfiable/provable, then writing the proof is just an exercise for a calculator
you're not a calculator, are you anon?

the most perfect paper is indeed just a series of true statements ended with "QED"

>>9168351
>>9168356
>t. haven't read IUT

>>9168038
>>9168243
What if you assume that a number can only be prime if there is atleast one whole number besides itself, one, and zero that is smaller than it.

>>9168371
Imagine that all numbers were imagined by people and still are...

>>9168371
>besides itself
>smaller than it
holy shit anon what are you hiding from us?

>>9168373
True, for all the so called progress mathematics has given, people tend to forget that NUMBERS are just SOCIAL CONSTRUCTS!

Physics -1 Math -0

>>9168371
>What if you assume that a number can only be prime if there is atleast one whole number besides itself, one, and zero that is smaller than it.
Then you completely redefine what a prime number is. Holy shit this post is ridiculous. Imagine 10, get rid of 10, 1, and 0. So numbers 9 through 2 are smaller than it and 10 is prime, by your logic.

Are Japs master race?

>>9168468
he obviously means this condition is to be added to the current definition

>>9168373
daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamnn...........

BUZKASHI
U
Z
K
A
S
H
I

File: 1.19035.jpg (38KB, 300x269px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 300x269px

What's with his neck and that dumb smile?

>>9166639
yup, but it's not like he did everything from scratch, there was already a field called Teichmuller theory. He just extended that to work on other objects. But yeah, it is a bit like knowing calculus in R^n and extending it to work on manifolds.

>>9168755
He's japanese, anon, don't be racist.

>>9168516
Then it would be every prime number in existence other than 2. He could just say: "Where 2 isn't prime."

>>9170480
but 2 is a prime

>>9168300
>That's what you have to do..
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems
I'm not sure you understand what those theorems really mean

>>9166988
(You)

>>9166639
Okay everyone give me topology textbook recommendations.

>>9171097
Munkres.

But if you're really interested in this crap you should do Atiyah-MacDonald while doing Munkres. Then do Eisenbud's Commutative Algebra and Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry. That should take you at least 2 years. Now you're ready to start learning the prereqs for IUTT.

>>9171113
Wow thank you anon. Sometimes this board offers up diamonds among the shit.

>>9171127
>diamonds among the shit.
Nutshell 4chan

>>9171127
>the most well known, canon books of their fields
>"diamonds"

>>9171145
Tells you how unfamiliar I am with topology and what constitutes being well-known.

>>9171097
Munkres' topology is a primo book for topology, used everywhere.

Once you get through the first 2/3 you should check out Munkres Analysis on Manifolds! No one ever talks about that but it's an awesome look at your seminal calculus proofs using topology instead of just analysis. It gets really high up there...maybe my favorite math text ever.

File: Capture.png (186KB, 730x201px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 730x201px

>>9166639
http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/anpi-kakunin-jouhou.html

>>9171113
Do I need to read up on abstract algebra before Atiyah-MacDonald or is Atiyah-MacDonald self-contained?

File: Akarin window.jpg (41KB, 551x720px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 551x720px

>>9166639
On an unrelated note, I wonder what kind of anime does he like, being Japanese and all.

>>9171486
And I'm not OP, I don't know why I wrote "On an unrelated note".
I need to sleep.

>>9166639
Does anyone on /sci/ understand it?

>>9171556
Fesenko doesn't browse /sci/, neither do God himself and his right hand. There's nobody else who understands it, so no, there's no such person on /sci/.

File: Capture.png (112KB, 917x170px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 917x170px

>>9171566
>Fesenko doesn't browse /sci/
page 6: http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~gokun/DOCUMENTS/abc_ver6.pdf

>>9171568
Are you a retard or have you never used email?

>>9171589
>Are you a retard or have you never used email?
elaborate

http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~gokun/footnote.html

>>9171592
'>' is used as quotation mark in emails, not everyone who uses it (in a fucking email) is a 4chin
if you were not an underage facebook shitposter, you would have known that by using email for communication, not just as spambox
i suggest you not spill your spaghetti on your profs, when you get to uni and they reply to your email, quoting you

>>9171600
>'>' is used as quotation mark in emails, not everyone who uses it (in a fucking email) is a 4chin
>if you were not an underage facebook shitposter, you would have known that by using email for communication, not just as spambox
>i suggest you not spill your spaghetti on your profs, when you get to uni and they reply to your email, quoting you
Did you even read the footnote.html page I linked? Go obviously knows '>' is used as a quote since he uses it himself that way. Please work on your reading comprehension

>>9171592
Some email software indent received text with ">" when you reply

The man is accusing another of making up false allegations in an email using ">"

Many message boards use ">" to quote text, and it's not something that was invented or original to 4chan

>>9171608
>Some email software indent received text with ">" when you reply
>The man is accusing another of making up false allegations in an email using ">"
>Many message boards use ">" to quote text, and it's not something that was invented or original to 4chan
see >>9171607

>>9171607
As I wrote in my previous reply:
>Many message boards use ">" to quote text, and it's not something That was invented or original to 4chan

http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~gokun/footnote.html
At the bottom he writes:
>(These quoted sentences are not modified ones nor fabricated ones.)

>>9171616
You seem to have interpreted my post as implying Fesenko does browse /sci/. I quoted that part because it was implying Fesenko understood IUT, while the footnote suggests otherwise

>>9171620
Indeed that was my interpratation, my apologies.
IUTeich is like a korean soap-opera, but all the people who claim to understand it say the same things. So either none of them does, or they all do. I don't care about these petty dramas. If he really fabricated an email, he's a dick, but that doesn't change anything about his understanding of IUTeich.
For even better drama, read some papers on string theory.

>>9171556
not a lot of professional mathematicians understand it.

File: 20170907_0100_eit171_1024.jpg (403KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 1024x1024px

so can anyone elaborate in laymans terms what exatly he did with his theory that wasnt doable before or what is exactly new or what will be possible in the future(maybe)? thankyou

>>9172028
no

>>9172028
no

>>9168341
>LSD
>smoking

>>9172209
>the joke
>you're head

>>9172028
yes

>>9172028
maybe

http://inference-review.com/article/fukugen

>>9168468
the longer i think about it, the more unnerving it gets

>>9172216
your*

>>9172731
this better be bait

>>9170481
No shit, Sherlock.

>>9168383
>[math]-0[/math]
found the engineer

>>9172736
*bee

>>9171097
Whichever one has the dog sphere.

>>9172028
perhaps

>>9167194
>refuses to explain himself
but he holds conferences on it

>>9172028
no

>>9172028
possibly

>>9171566
Ivan Fesenko is a fraud.
http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~gokun/footnote.html