Does EmDrive disprove laws of physics?

>>9163650
why should it? please explain your thougths

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4872220/Has-China-cracked-Nasa-s-impossible-engine.html

>>9163655
>net force without propellant
>newton compliant
Pick one

>>9163650
According to the inventor, no, the EMDrive operates fully within known physics, and falls under the rules governing radiation pressure.

>>9163650
No. It's almost certainly some an isotropy in the way the heat that's being radiated away, a bit like the Pioneer anomaly.
>>9163662
>DailyFail
>>9163668
The inventor is a retard who thinks there's a difference between acceleration and deceleration.

>>9163668
this
and even when it would not operate under known physicals laws, it would still not break physical laws, we would just need to rethink them.

The chinks seem awfully confident in this now after the tiangong testing, could this actually be a thing?