when will we outbreed all racetraits and have only one mixed

>>9158213
one or two more generations. thats all we need to remove the filth

>>9158246
but when will we have a worldwide mixed race?
i don't talk about this stupid black vs. white bullshit. i mean all races.

>>9158213

We did already, there's only homo sapiens left.

>>9158273
...you know what i mean...

Genetics does not work that way. Traits do not disappear unless all people with those traits disappear or they are prevented from being passed down. As long as someone with some trait has kids, they are passing on their genes.

When the earths becomes completely homogenous in every way.

File: concerned adolf.jpg (94KB, 481x593px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 481x593px

why not just kill everyone else and just leave white people?

>>9158437
white people get melanomas, genetically modified superhumans would need to be dark

>>9158458

we just make our skin color be adjustable giving different rates of radiation

>>9158213
>when will we outbreed all racetraits and have only one mixed human race left?
it won't ever happen actually
we've been trying to explain this to you dumb fucking cunts but you have to be willing to read a book

File: habeeb it.jpg (66KB, 512x407px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 512x407px

>>9158213

only idiots with no power of reasoning believe this meme.

the most isolated race(s) with the most members will be all that survives. ie. chinese, africans, indians, and a whole bunch of mutts in between.

File: 1503306272183.jpg (155KB, 1462x1462px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1462x1462px

>>9158213

Good luck getting ashkenazi Jews to mix race, Israel completely opposes the idea of mixing with gentiles.

>>9158533
>ashkenazi Jews
>Israel

back to pol faggot

>>9158213
There have actually been studies on the genetic diversity of populations, and you want to know the results?

*long drumroll*

Populations do not become genetically homongenous over time! In fact, as long as there exist distinct interbreeding groups with occassionally new members coming in to share and diversify their genetic pool then mathematically there will still be traits, genes, and "races" (in context of genes and traits, ethnicities would be a better term of categorization). Here's some food for thought which emphasizes this fact: Why has the blue eyes gene persisted in the human population since it's random mutation in one single person some 8,000 years ago? It wasn't because some organized government banned
gene mixing between brown eyed and blue eyed people or gave the blue eyed person 50 wives, it was because the blue eye gene naturally took it's place in the gene pool and over thousands of years has expressed itself in millions of individuals. You should only have to care about "one single race" in the future if people are FORCED to choose specific partners, which means as long as people are FREE to breed as they choose, there will always exist different ethnicities and traits among populations.

>>9158481 and >>9158338 already got the idea here, but for some reason this stupid meme still persists in people. I get that it is intuitive to think that, because statistics favor certain genes getting passed down over others, that there will be in single trait since all other variations would be bred out, but this is not the case. While some genes will come and some will go, there will always be a diversity in the expressed traits of different populations and muh racemixing isn't going to change that.

TL;DR Populations don't become genetically homogenous over time as long as individuals breed as they choose

>>9159135
Here's a second post relating to better sources regarding my claims

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_genetics#Four_processes

The sections that most relate to the topics my post discusses are sections 2.3 and 2.4 regarding Genetic Drift and Gene Flow, respectively.

>inb4 wikipedia is unreliable dumbass you can edit the pages and put in your own sources

You can also check those sources for any claims made on the wikipedia page to see if they are bullshit, I can say that the sources aren't CNN or Buzzfeed articles so they don't appear to be bullshit on the surface.

>>9158467
>what is tanning

>>9159135
>>9159173
Shouldn't bump a /pol/ bait thread, but it'd be more accurate say that races do vanish over time - but you get new ones, and individual traits can always re-emerge.

Besides, humans can make a big deal of even the slightest variation, often claiming race difference that humans, or even machines, from another society could never hope to distinguish (see Rwanda), and race isn't the only mechanism humans will use to tribalize and dehumanize one another. In the end, we could all be genetic clones, and we'd still find ways to break into cliques, that's just how socialization works.

Besides, eventually we'll have CRISPR "humans" and Martians to deal with. Race may become irrelevant (and may even be largely irrelevant already), but we'll always find ways to separate "us" from "them".