Electrogravitics:

>>9156035
New brainlet meme theory.
SAGE

File: Ouroboros.png (25KB, 358x380px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 358x380px

>>9156035
sweet ouroboros, what's the equation

>>9156095
Oh, you've already read all the papers?
Oh no wait, you haven't!

>>9156101
Very aesthetic.

>>9156101
It probably isn't that hard to figure out. Make a torus that gets higher radius with angle and shits phase and gets bigger as t progresses.

>>9156035
Is it peer reviewed?
Does it stand the observations?
What does it predict?

>>9156035
>Electrogravitational Field Theory:
Why not magnetogravity?

>>9156140
>Oh, you've already read all the papers?
>Oh no wait, you haven't!
Not him but: not necesary, Weinberg-Witten already said NO.

Also, in first paper I opened (Aug. 17, 2012) I found:
"Where, the Golden Ratio squared is stated as:
[math]\left( \frac{4}{\pi} \right)^4 [/math]"
You don't even know what the golden ratio is....[math] \phi^2 =\frac{3+\sqrt{5}}{2} [/math]

You are not only dumb, you are also illiterate.

File: Captura de Tela 2017-09-08 às 13.10.58.png (115KB, 752x603px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 752x603px

>>9156143
>>9156101
Now you just need to vary v and scale it with t.

What?