I was thinking this graphic is misleading because it shows the height of the explosion and explosions are about volume.
I wanted to know how the diameter of a Tsar Bomba blast would compare with the Hiroshima blast.
So.. a sphere is (4pi/3) * r^3. Let's suppose the volume/power of the Hiroshima blast is 1. then 1 Hiroshima Blast Volume = (4pi/3) * r^3. Solving for r we get ((3/(4pi)) ^ (1/3) = r = 0.62035049089 (units of length I hope?)
Tsar Bomba at 5000kt was 333.3 times as powerful as the 15kt Hiroshima blast.
5000 Hiroshima Blast Volumes = (4pi/3) * r^3
So r = ((3 * (5000/15)/(4pi))^(1/3) = 4.30112668869 ( are these Hiroshima blast radii? What units? )
((4 * pi) / 3 ) * (4.30112668869)^(1/3) = 6.81212624003 ( of what?) I thought Tsar Bomba was supposed to be 333.3 times Hiroshima..
What about if we assumed explosions were cubes? Then the formula for volume is l^3.
1 Hiroshima blast volume = 1 Hiroshima blast length ^ 3
1 Hiroshima blast volume ^ (1/3) = 1 Hiroshima Blast Length.
1 Tsar Bomba Blast Volume = 1 Tsar Bomba Blast length ^ 3
5000 Hiroshima Blast Volumes = 1 Tsar Bomba Blast Length ^ 3
((5000/15) Hiroshima Blast Volumes) ^ (1/3) = 1 Tsar Bomba Blast Length = 6.93 (units = Hiroshima blast lengths?)
I feel like I am fumbling around like an idiot.
(1000/15) Hiroshima Blast Volumes ^ (1/3) = 1 Mike Blast Length = 4.05 ( units = hiroshima blast lengths?)
>>9146690
er, that graph has nothing to do with volume or size, except referencing how much energy is released in kt (and mt) of TNT
>>9146696
It's drawing a mushroom cloud shaped thing as tall as the energy difference is. But I would assume the volume of the explosion would be proportional to the power. And volume increases as the cube, so the cloud of Tsar Bomba would be much smaller than shown here relative to Hiroshima.
But then I started trying to calculate how tall Tsar Bomba should have been drawn to look right and realized I generally suck at this sort of thing...
>>9146715
just dont assume things based on the graphic, it's just a cute picture but doesnt really hold any data other than the tip of the mushroom cloud being the data point. I really doubt like "destructive power" is directly proportional like that. But yea i can't help with the calculations sorry