Is string theory a pseudoscience?

>>9146637
no but youre mom is lol

>>9146637
Not really, although it does have the issue of not having any modern capability to be experimentally tested. Because of that, it's stuck in a state whereas it makes sense and adds up in theory but no one really knows for sure if it is true

Yes, it is unfalsifiable brain masturbation.

>>9146637
No, it is science in action -- a hypothesis has been put forward, physicists are trying to test it, which turns out to be harder than they might have hoped.

A hypothesis canbe incorrect, that is not "pseudo-science."

>>9146753
>Yes, it is unfalsifiable brain masturbation.
Wrong, please refrain from commenting about things you know nothing about. There's plenty of ways to falsify string theory, we just don't have the technology for it yet.

>>9146914
>There's plenty of ways to falsify string theory, we just don't have the technology for it yet.
Name 3 (three).

>>9147013
1) observed violations of bounds for coefficients of operators in the electroweak chiral Lagrangian
2) certain observations of positive curvature in cosmology
3) unitarity breaking