What is the best philosophical mathematics book ever written?
black swan
>>9140849
>google black swan
>A bunch of pictures of roasties
No thank you, women aren't math.
>>9140868
But that is already mostly accepted. There is no point in reading mathematical philosophy unless it has some edge to it. Divine proportions is just not controversial enough.
>>9140867
Don't be sexist. It's morally wrong and illegal.
>>9140849
Ugh what a pseud
>>9140884
You are wrong. You should not be sexist.
As the Declaration of Independence of the United States, the US constitution, and the Charter of the United Nations (of which US is part of) tells us: all humans created equal.
You should correct your incorrect values.
>>9140901
>the US
>all humans created
>humans created
>CREATED
Kek americunt go back to paying 50,000 dollars for tuition. This is a board for serious people living in first world countries with free education, not third world shitholes.
>>9140909
You are trying to disrupt the debate.
I am challenging your views on gender equality. Please explain to me your position on gender equality and argument why you support that conclusion.
Your attitude towards developing countries is also alarming, but first we shall discuss the gender equality.
wew it sure is /reddit/ in here
>>9140868
unironically this
The Philosophy of Mathematics by Bertrand Russell, obviously.
my diary desu
>>9140868
Is this the right one? I don't think this is the right one.
>>9140909
Yes, CREATED, by God himself. You probably define God as a "an old man in the sky" right? Get a grip, seriously.
>>9142164
>>9142189
>by God himself
Or maybe just by a mommy.
probly one of these:
http://fernando-gil.org.pt/en/nominees/
http://fernando-gil.org.pt/en/nominees/2013/
http://fernando-gil.org.pt/en/nominees/2011/
http://fernando-gil.org.pt/en/nominees/2010/
Idk, probably this.
>>9142211
Is Kant worth reading?
>>9142277
>Upper class brainlets
When will they learn?
>>9142164
No, that's it.
>>9142308
For its philosophical importance, yes, but even he admitted he was a shit writer aesthetically.
>>9140846
Well, I'm reading What Is Life? by Schrödinger.
It isn't that mathematical, or the best philosophical...but I'm liking it.
>>9140917
do ppl take you serious irl?
>>9140846
hard to say, but Weyl's writing is phenomenal (bah-dum-chhh)