[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Fluoride etc

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 112
Thread images: 6

File: A59.jpg (34KB, 472x461px) Image search: [Google]
A59.jpg
34KB, 472x461px
Redpill me on the toxicity of toothpaste and mouthwash. Is fluoride bad for you? What about all of the weird ingredients they use in these products? They can't be good for you.
>>
You're not supposed to eat the paste.
>>
Lowers iq
>>
>>9139115
but you absorb it and it gets into your saliva anyway so you do eat it.
>>
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/fluoride-childrens-health-grandjean-choi/

The average loss in IQ was reported as a standardized weighted mean difference of 0.45, which would be approximately equivalent to seven IQ points for commonly used IQ scores with a standard deviation of 15. Some studies suggested that even slightly increased fluoride exposure could be toxic to the brain.
>>
>>9139129
no you dont absorb it. you wash and rinse after brushing, dont you?
>>
>>9139140
what do you think sodium fluoride does in your mouth anon
>>
>>9139143
Obviously it keeps you from turning into a reptilian too so the gubment can keep using you as a slave.
>>
>>9139131
>children
none of us are children
>>
>>9139312
>none of us are children
Where do you think you are?
>>
The concentrations are far too low to do anything.

The toxic part of toothpaste is not flouride, but the triclosan. Flouride labels are just mandatory, but triclosan is a topic antiseptic that shouldn't be ingested.
>>
>>9139131
>https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/fluoride-childrens-health-grandjean-choi/
>The researchers conducted a systematic review of studies, almost all of which are from China where risks from fluoride are well-established. Fluoride is a naturally occurring substance in groundwater, and exposures to the chemical are increased in some parts of China.

That study looked at places with levels of fluoride that were already dangerous. In the US fluoride levels in water are regulated.
>>
>>9139131
But Americans put Flouride in their water, so what's a little extra from toothpaste gonna do?
>>
>>9139458
>regulated
No, they aren't. For two reasons:
-You cannot control all sources of fluoride a given individual has, or variation in excretion / retention rate
-Many municipal water supplies do not actually conform to the levels set by regulations. Google this if you want to know more.

Also, sodium fluoride is not what's actually added to water. There are a few major formulations, with varying composition. Most of which severely contaminated with heavy metals, and a byproduct of phosphate extraction. None of which being sodium fluoride, and one some volatile compound that has unpredictable reaction / breakdown products once it's actually added to water.

It's absurd.
>>
>>9139458
This. there's a difference between there being a few parts per million of fluoride per unit volume of water, and ingesting enough fluoride to cause cognitive imparemnt
>>
What about animal products and non-organic vegetables?
>>
>>9139468
That's fear talking, not reason.
>I'm trapped, so I'll just decide it
s okay because they're probably only hurting me a little
>>
>>9139471
>he dosen't know that the dose makes the poison
>>
>>9139481
That's not universally true, some things are inherently detrimental to a given system, regardless of dose. And the doses present here are harmful. That's the point of the post buddy boyo.

>>9139466
>>
>>9139466
So you are claiming that someone is intentionally putting toxic stuff in our water?

Also, volatile is a specific term in chemistry. It doesn't mean unstable. It means that molecules easily evaporate.

>>>/x/
>>
>>9139492
>So you are claiming that someone is intentionally putting toxic stuff in our water?
Purpose is irrelevant.

>Also, volatile is a specific term in chemistry.
Irrelevant. Meaning is inferred via context and level of knowledge. That's how you still knew what I meant, and you'd also know what I meant if I said "volatile organic compound".

Don't needy and defensive.
>>
>>9139131
>>9139455
>>9139458
>>9139460
>>9139466
>>9139468
>>9139471
>>9139481
>>9139487
>>9139492
>>9139499
this thread is about toothpaste and shit like that. the amount in toothpaste is WAY higher than water. you literally have to go to the hospital if you eat toothpaste. it's clearly not good for you.
>>
>>9139522
I don't think anyone is claiming that it is not a bad idea to eat toothpaste.
This anon >>9139455 had a good response about toothpaste specifically
>>
It's funny how chemists, biologists, and doctors don't but into any of this stupid shit. Only uneducated dipshits.

If you cared you'd go get a degree in medicine and come back and say "yeah I was right, after years of studying biology and medicine I've determined that fluoride is bad". But you won't.

Only uneducated dipshits peddle this garbage.
>>
>>9139771
>It's funny how chemists, biologists, and doctors don't but into any of this stupid shit. Only uneducated dipshits.
How many chemists, biologists, and doctors do you know? How many have you talked to?

Oh that's right, probably ~0. You're just operating on the mythical notion of "consensus" and assuming all of a field is one person, because you're not a scientist and have this starry eyes ivory tower-esque delusion of science.

Most people's opinions aren't rational, adaptive, or intelligent. In a modern cultural climate that rigidly demands conformity to a top down engineered consensus, the problem is compounded.
>>
>>9139112
>he hasn't overcame the fear of injesting random chemicals

lol just drink it bro brain damage is a meme
>>
>>9141048
I'm a PhD student in molecular nutrition with a degree in biochemistry, the levels in agua are fine my man
>>
>>9141051
>>9141061
hell yea bro I love to drink 20 4 locos and fuck a hole I found outside my friends house

this is what college is all about!
>>
>>9141061
Do you think pulsed microwave fields are biologically active, and net detrimental to human health?
>>
>>9139112
It's not just fluoride. It's a fluoride salt. Don't be one of those people who thinks table salt gives you chlorine poisoning.

Fluoride has been proven to prevent tooth decay. If you're in a place without fluoride in the water you should be taking fluoride supplements or else your teeth might have to be removed. The benefits far outweigh the supposed risks. Don't fall for the bottled water meme.

Oh, and it turns frogs gay.
>>
>>9141074
Thanks Doc. You have truly earned my shekels.
>>
Harm/exposure to fluoride follows a hormetic u-shaped curve.

Too little is bad for you. Too much is bad for you.

/thread
>>
>>9141079
The window for hormesis is incredibly narrow.
>>
>>9141075
Well it's either the Doctor Jew or the Bottled Jew. Take your pick.
>>
File: Fluoride.jpg (264KB, 1171x1996px) Image search: [Google]
Fluoride.jpg
264KB, 1171x1996px
why do you think the GOVERNMENT would be pushing you to (((brush))) your teeth?
>>
>>9141066
No, stop posting your gay threads about it.
>>9141061
I don't drink often, brother. There's a real substance that can fuck you up
>>
>>9141098
Perhaps it's the reduction of gingivitis and tooth decay? Or maybe it's the gay frogs, it's a toss up
>>9141116
Meant to quote >>9141064
>>
>>9141116
>No
Then you're a know-nothin' with valueless opinions, until proven otherwise. On the same level as someone claiming cells are a myth.
>>
>>9141048
I'm a chemistry PhD, I know loads of doctors, biochemists, biologists. Fluoride is fine there's way more things you should be worried about.
>>
>>9141066
oh fuck its this fucking asshole
>>
>>9141144
What makes it so bad supposedly?
>>
>>9141144
Like cell phones and wi-fi.

>>9141146
The anger stems from fear. It was known in the late 50's that modulated fields could affect electron transport relative to various cell structures, and that they altered calcium efflux. Many papers spoke plainly about this, and there was none of the trash you see in modern literature where they pussyfoot around and repeatedly address whether or not it's "thermal", as though they're afraid of falling out of line. Of course it's largely non-thermal, it's been determined repeatedly that effects are seen at levels below 0.5mW/cm2.

If you're scared or disappointed, I'm sorry but shooting the messenger doesn't change anything. I made you know, and there's no going back.
>>
>>9141160
You've been proven wrong every single time. shut the fuck up already.
>>
>>9141166
I haven't.

I'm just going to start posting older literature. The new literature says the same things, but is more centered around cell death and cancer.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.2250030302/abstract
>>
>>9141167
>I haven't.
You saying that doesn't magically make it not the case. People like you make no sense. If what you were saying was true, you'd be able to publish a study and become a world-renowned scientist. You won't because you can't prove anything, because it's not true, and you've been proven wrong by dozens of anons with actual educations over and over again.
>>
>>9141174
I don't have to publish much of anything. The research was more or less in place ~1995. Everything after that point was details and how various factors relate. The studies have been done. We know pulsed fields alter certain aspects of membrane potential (such that a ligand binding to its receptor achieves a different outcome), and activate calcium channels.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.2250120303/full
>>
>>9141178
I'm just going to wait until the educated anons come in and show why you're wrong for the 100th time.
>>
>>9141066
STOP HIJACKING MY FUCKING THREAD FOR YOUR STUPID FUCKING FALSE BULLSHIT
>>
>>9141181
>>9141185

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/345d/e033b3b791989202c118417ba84ed4ec8773.pdf?_ga=2.131801871.1669037105.1504221818-1704401349.1504221818

and further:
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5306/e5b2a202f3aaa815ff553d5d28c5606a746f.pdf

Why so set on that I'm wrong, when all the evidence says the exact opposite? And has for the last 60 years? The only possibility is either fear, or an inability to think for yourself.
>>
https://academic.oup.com/carcin/article-abstract/8/10/1385/2478037/The-effects-of-low-energy-60-Hz-environmental?redirectedFrom=PDF
>>
>>9139112
Brush your teeth you autist
>>
>>9141167
>I haven't.
Yes you have.
>>
>>9141194
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0006899373900085

Your behavior is bizarre.
>>
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00973286
>>
>>9141198
Your behavior is very bizarre, yes. Repeatedly posting links to things nobody is looking at because you've been proven wrong for a long time.
>>
>>9141207
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4995199
>>
>>9141207
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC393172/pdf/pnas00022-0578.pdf
>>
>>9141213
>>9141221
what is this
>>
>>9141225
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bem.2250050307/abstract
>>
>>9141228
Why do you think this is correct?
>>
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e46a/98e25e12658a7c2e1c72e0142d96c1f2b891.pdf?_ga=2.158591034.1669037105.1504221818-1704401349.1504221818
>>
>>9141230
Why would someone think anything is correct? Why do you, or your idealized version of yourself, or a hypothetical 'objective' truth seeking human being, think anything is correct?

What a dumb question, to be quite blunt about it. Instead of trying to talk me into a defensive position for whatever reason, try actually reading what I'm posting. The bulk of the literature, modern and otherwise, says the same damn thing. Across everything I know, have read, and see, it makes sense.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e46a/98e25e12658a7c2e1c72e0142d96c1f2b891.pdf?_ga=2.158591034.1669037105.1504221818-1704401349.1504221818
>>
>>9141235
You can't even answer a simple question. Why do you think it's correct?
>>
>>9141240
The answer is in the post you quoted.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19230827
>>
File: deep thoughts.jpg (15KB, 532x320px) Image search: [Google]
deep thoughts.jpg
15KB, 532x320px
>>9139115
then why do they make it taste so good?
>>
File: 1493227251378.jpg (72KB, 960x612px) Image search: [Google]
1493227251378.jpg
72KB, 960x612px
>>9139120
>>9139131
>they actually memed that bullshit into reality
>>
>>9141267
>grew up drinking fluoridated water
>are now afraid
>choose to go into denial, and ensure the practice is continued
>become the problem
Par for the course. Most people aren't leaders.
>>
I can see the argument against consuming fluoride or adding it to water, but I really don't see any argument for not using it topically or through a rinse (which you're not meant to consume). Using "natural" ingredients instead seems like it would just predispose you to softer teeth and decay. But I'm not a dental professional or a doctor.
>>
>>9139522
>bottle of bleach says to not drink it
>drink it anyway
>wtf
>>
This is interesting.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1434994/pdf/biophysj00204-0163.pdf

>>9141274
Limited studies have shown theobromine to be superior in terms of remineralization.
>>
>>9141255
>People don't put disgusting things in their mouth
>People prefer putting things that taste nice in their mouth
>>
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2738103
>>
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7126280
>>
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/205c/f09f8f27d729be43078dfd9c334af209f014.pdf?_ga=2.140247091.1669037105.1504221818-1704401349.1504221818
>>
>>9141279
Does theobromine act in the same way as fluoride? I've heard that different substances like xylitol or CPP-ACP promote remineralization in different ways than fluoride. I'm a layman so I can't evaluate this with much depth on my own. I'm now inspired to add cacao to my diet in either case.
>>
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01616412.1982.11739619

>>9141299
I'm not sure how it works. Research is fairly limited, underlying mechanics are mostly speculative. Anecdotally I'd say it does appear to work quite well.
>>
>>9141271
Right, just like with cigarettes. Oh, wait.
>>
>>9141308
>grow up hearing about how bad cigarettes are
>are now afraid of smoking and part of collective group dynamics that impose further behavioral biases
>choose not to go against the grain
>remain the problem
Par for the course. Most people aren't leaders. Whether cigarettes are bad or good relative to a given value system is irrelevant, because the above is largely what drives it. The same mechanics.
>>
In summary, wi-fi, cell phones, bluetooth, power line emissions, etc, are biologically active and detrimental. This has been known for a long time, and yet, we did it anyway. We dug ourselves in this deep. Look around at all these fucked up people, with fucked up little problems. Everywhere. You really think this is all natural? A function of population, certain ratio for any given quantity, and that's why you see it everywhere? Fuck no.

Take an honest look around.
>>
>>9141346
In summary, you've been destroyed every single time you've posted, and you're just going to plug your ears and post the same copypasta over and over again until 4chan no longer exists. Anybody can search warosu for "Pulsed microwave" to see countless examples of you being destroyed and pretending otherwise.
>>
>>9139187
This was just lazy
>>
>>9141318
The difference, which you are unable to accept, is that cigarettes have an overwhelming amount of evidence suggesting that they cause cancer and early death, are costly, and are a choice. The amount of overlap here is too small to be an effective comparison.

>>9141346
> Look around at all these fucked up people, with fucked up little problems. Everywhere. You really think this is all natural? A function of population, certain ratio for any given quantity, and that's why you see it everywhere?
Did you just assume that different populations would have different levels of different diseases without the "biologically active and detrimental" factors, and then use that as evidence that they are detrimental?
>>
Reminder that microwave man is an insane hypochrondiac who claims his symptoms are due to electricity.

https://warosu.org/sci/thread/S9093546#p9098512
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/S7644877#p7650927
>>
>>9141504
OOOHH yeah he's THAT fucking guy. ahahahaha wow. no fucking wonder.
>>
>>9141508
Check out this autistic rage.
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/S7644877#p7651058
>>
>>9141504
>who claims his symptoms are due to electricity
I've never said anything to remotely suggest this. It's unsurprising that you'd confuse your assumptions for reality. Twists things around to make the story juicier, and make it all "make sense".

Pretty well says it all about you.
>>
>>9142647
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/S9095534#p9098718
>>
>>9142656
Go on?
>>
>>9142658
>It's hard to describe how
because it doesn't and you have trouble coming up with something.
>>
>>9142667
Why does it need to be that way for you?
>>
>>9142668
it's not that way for me, it's reality.
>>
>>9142677
That sounds epistemologically unsound.
>>
Sorry, but the nut job ITT thinking his own problems aren't bad luck from his genes and instead thinking it's because of falsified claims for electromagnetic radiation should be ban-worthy. it's flat earth tier. he's basically the lung cancer nut.
>>
>>9142690
>the truth should be banned
Sounds familiar.
>>
>>9142693
Don't put words in my mouth. Uneducated idiots like you should be banned. You spread garbage because you're a miserable fuck that so badly wants an answer to the why of your problems. Fuck you.
>>
>>9142693
>The truth
Even your papers require an illogical leap to support your claims.
>>
>>9142694
I post literature published over the course of 60 years, which continues to be validated.

>that so badly wants an answer to the why of your problems
Refer to: >>9142647
I don't really care much about the reasons behind me or my life, at this point. Part of me does, but it's different.

Your theory of mind is underdeveloped / corrupted. You should learn to accurately put yourself in someone else's shoes. Imagine accepting reality, and living in it.
>>
>>9142711
Elaborate fully. Provide examples. And bear in mind, the authors I've selected are not random.
>>
>>9142730
I'm not going to bother arguing with you again because you're a mentally ill brick wall who disregards everything that goes against your delusions. Anybody who wants to see your garbage disproved can look it up on warosu.
>>
Also, bear in mind that I'm not at all hooked internally or externally. If I don't receive something substantive and intelligent, I'll probably just leave. Allocate yourself accordingly.
>>
>>9142740
Post the disproof. It's never happened.
>>
>>9142727
>>9142730
It has already happened multiple times. Nobody wants to fucking bother with you anymore. You're wrong and always have been. Ignoring it doesn't make it go away.
>>
>>9142742
>I'm not at all hooked internally or externally
Then why do you spend all your time on /sci/ looking for an argument so you can convince yourself you're a misunderstood genius?
If you're going to leave, leave.
>>
>>9142747
>Ignoring it doesn't make it go away.
You're beginning to catch on. Some part of you knows, and it gnaws at you. Statements like this bubble up as a result.

And it hasn't. Probably because everything we've ever observed supports what I've said.
>>
>>9142751
>If you're going to leave, leave.
That is how it works.
>>
>>9142760
Then go, clearly your revolutionary genius is lost on us retards.
>>
>>9142758
>changes it to be about everyone else instead of him
This is why you are the way you are and will never learn anything.
>>
>>9142780
When I'm ready.

>>9142782
I've lived many ways.
>>
Someone give this guy a few depot injections.
>>
>>9139112
op should check out Jeranism, Infinite Plane society & The Highersidechats on YouTube. Red Pills a plenty.
>>
File: 1501371346191.gif (3MB, 465x275px) Image search: [Google]
1501371346191.gif
3MB, 465x275px
Fluoride ion is a 5HT-2A antagonist. Psychedelics like LSD and psilocybin are 5HT-2A agonists. Fluoride makes you a narrow-minded sheep.
>>
I thought it was that the amount of flouride isn't important, but it has to be diluted? So like even though you ingest more flouride by drinking water, it's diluted, as opposed to eating paste straight up
Thread posts: 112
Thread images: 6


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.