I propose to you: quantum trap theory. Since the discussion of

WHOMST

>>9137948
if a boy fucks a trap girl would that count?

>>9137998
Only the boy who fucked the trap can say if it's gay or not, but only with that trap.

>>9138043
In the set of all { GAY }, each trap is orthogonal

>>9137948
If you know its a trap then its gay.
Because you are attracted to the female features you see.
However after fucking the trap if you enjoy it then it is objectively gay

It's not gay until balls touch.

>>9137948
I don't care if I'm gay or not, I just care about slurping and suckling upon that sweet, tasty feminine penis.

>>9138084
So you've fucked a trap? According to this theory you can say if it's gay or not because you have observed it.

>>9138116
But only for that exact trap.

People have it so backwards.
You aren't supposed to pick your sexual orientation and then look for partners based on that orientation.
You're supposed to follow whatever your heart desires, and then when someone wants to have a general idea of what you're into, you can extrapolate from your past love interests to find out what your orientation is - and if there's ambiguity there, that doesn't mean a large part of men have their definition wrong. It means the definition is bad, as it's bot clear enough for people to agree what it means. The purpose of 'giving someone a general idea of who you like' is lost or at least hindered.
How to solve that problem?
Either we all agree on a new definition, or people stop making assumptions about border cases when they hear gay or straight, and clarify for each individual case. Just stop trying to fit people into the same narrow categories when you notice the categories don't encompass the full spectrum of possibilities.

>>9138150
TL;DR

>>9137948
Quantum trap theory already exists. It says that if you are attracted to it, but don't know of it is a man or a woman, then you aren't gay and aren't straight at the same time. But we have to consider the uncertainty principle: we can't know both the sexuality and gender of a trap at the same time.

How do you fuck something THAT HAS NOT FUCKING PUSSY=??????


i HAVE TRIED

ANAL SEX SUCK

MY DICK IS TOO BIG FOR THAT


I prefer real women. Trans girls are like mermaids, they have only 1 hole accecible.

And their feminine penizes do not even work

Traps are more gay than men

>>9137948
That is not a trap

>>9138239
He is a faggot

>>9138271
>dick too big for anal

You do realize there are people who are into anal fisting?
You aren't saying your dick is bigger than your fist, are you?

>>9138079
This is the right answer.