>>9126742
Link or explanation? I live in a cave.
>>9126742
Imo as a scientist, I'd say yes. People might sperg out about muh inherent value, but while his lectures were really good, it would be a really bad upholding of MIT's (or any good) moral codex to use lectures of somebody who sexually harassed his students.
So yes, MIT was in the right. He should have done it in private during his office hours like everybody else and not get caught on Skype like a retard.
>>9126773
when u nutted, etc.
>>9126785
>somebody who sexually harassed his students
Allegedly
>>9126846
There's a video of the skype call somewhere.
>>9126773
Walter Lewin supposedly sexually harassed students so MIT (the university he taught in) removed all his content from their website.
>>9126876
What did he teach, ethics?
>>9126876
>students
Male or female?
My girlfriend was one of the girls involved in this.
Basically he did an online class, and encouraged students to email him. He kept a special mailing list of female students, and would actually give them extra help. My girlfriend got a personal physics lecture from Walter via skype, and there was nothing creepy involved.
Every now and then, he would send some really creepy sexual emails, and "Accidentally" send them to my girlfriend. I'm guessing this was a phishing tactic to see which girls would play along.
But basically he would promise these girls he could get them into MIT and so they did whatever he asked.
I'll ask my girlfriend for deets in a second, hopefully I can show you guys the creepy email.
>>9126742
>supposed sexual harassement
>read the reports about the case
>turns out he simply approached adult women, international EDX students, well into their thirties, online
>some women went along because women love social status
>send him nudes and whatnot
>he moves on
>the women decide they were abused
Really diminishes the entire concept of being "sexually harassed by a teacher".
>http://tech.mit.edu/V134/N63/lewin/Lewin_tweet_3.png
>http://tech.mit.edu/V134/N63/lewin/Lewin_tweet_5.png
>http://tech.mit.edu/V134/N63/lewin/Lewin_tweet_8.png
>http://tech.mit.edu/V134/N63/lewin/Lewin_tweet_2.png
B A S E D
A
S
E
D
gas this jew
>>9126907
all jews must pay
>>9126912
>His paternal grandparents Gustav and Emma Lewin, who were Jewish, were gassed in Auschwitz in 1942
oyy veyy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0M7qgV0Zz48&list=PLyQSN7X0ro22zanLOcvkaSY-IZqheFYM5&index=74
>>9126899
Physics, also he already retired
>>9126924
I'm dutch but I can't stand his dutch accent.
>>9126910
wtf am I reading
>>9126876
what does his content have to do with him hairdressing students?
it's not like the physics stuff he did is somehow suddenly wrong
>>9126907
>Really diminishes the entire concept of being "sexually harassed by a teacher".
that's the goal desu
>>9126907
>internet dating
Kind of takes the piss out of,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNIZofPB8ZM
>>9126858
>skype call
>sexual harassment
Pick one and only one
>>9126905
thanks
>>9126905
Doing God's work.
>>9126785
>upholding of MIT's (or any good) moral codex
lets be honest here boys, the reason the removed his shit is bc normies cry rivers over shit like this
>>9126926
Well then what exactly is the point? The only thing they're doing is depriving people of some knowledge. His promiscuity does not negate his scientific educational ability.
>>9126901
S P E C T R U M
>>9126905
seems legit
He is the best with chalk and blackboard.
>>9126742
I don't care if he's a pedophilic homicidal thieving version of mechahitlerstalin & lucifer's son who shoots kittens in the balls, his content stood on its own value, not its creator's, and should not have been removed
if you disagree with this, you belong on /lit/ discussing philosophy, not on fucking /sci/
saged because I already know this will be met with bait and idiots replying to said bait
>>9126905
thathappened.gifv
>>9126910
Why do Jews tend to be so vulgar?
>>9127209
The lectures still exist though, they're on YouTube.
MIT removed them because they don't want any association with an alleged sex offender, that would tarnish their reputation.
>>9126905
Guys, it's bullshit. Like what are the fuckin chances. He's attention seeking.
>>9128528
>alleged sex offender
I don't think it's even alleged that he ever did anything illegal.
It's pretty well documented that he is kind of a womanizer though, which I guess is enough to send SJWs into a frenzy.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nbjaiezesj/