Hey /sci/, what would happen if you convinced an indigenous Amazonian woman to mate with an indigenous South African man? Given that their ancestral roots are so geographically separated, would the resultant offspring be able to reproduce (which would biologically classify the parents as the same species)?
Asking for a friend.
>>9117038
Yes. It's probably happened in real life at some point as well.
>>9117062
How would you know? As far as I know it has never happened.
If it were to have occurred and the offspring was infertile, than how would this finding change our perception of sapient, bi-pedal primates. Would we have to reform the homo sapiens taxonomy?
>>9117038
I don't know but non white people are subhumans.
yes.. because they're under the same species - homo sapiens
>>9117098
>the same species
Assuming that they can produce a fertile offspring, which has yet to be demonstrated to my knowledge.
Zebras and donkeys can breed together, but the offspring (nicknamed a zebroid) is always infertile, thus separating the two animals into different species.
>>9117104
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zambo
>>9117104
Different species produce fertile offspring all the time.
>>9117079
Asians are not subhuman
>this thread every day
The definition of a species or subspecies is no longer based on the "viable offspring" idea, but rather rigorous genetic testing. Sorry, but all humans alive today are more genetically similar to one another than two different troops of chimpanzees are.
>>9117079
> Invasion
> Genocide
> Manifest destiny
> Spread of disease
> World war
> Chemical weapons
> Nuclear weapons
> Fire bombing
> Mass rape
> Ethnic cleansing
> Climate change
> Running cars into protestors
> Donald Trump
Sure. It's the blacks that are uncivilized.
>>9117260
i wouldn't say all the time, i think there have been like, 60 fertile mules in all of recorded history, and humans and neanderthals fucked all the time so there must have been a bunch of fertile hybrids and that's how we got some neanderthal DNA, but it's not common.
>>9117075
There are 2 reasons the offspring would be inferile.
1. the parents have such different reproductive systems that the offspring's reproductive system is really fucked up
2. different chromosome numbers
all human reproductive systems are basically the same, and all racial catagories have the same number of chromosomes, so, sorry, you don't get a scientific justification for /pol/'s opinions.
>>9117038
Yeah it would reproduce but that would be one stupid ass ugly baby.
You would get an idiot aka Brazilian.
>>9117359
Only the nuclear weapons and manifest destiny pertain to whites because noga are too stupid to create anything nuclear. Everything else nogs are perfectly capable of doing especially mass rape, genocide, fire bombing, climate change (they fuck like rats and more humans mean more resources), ethnic cleansing, and even Donald Trump(no nog prez before him would not have caused the masses to be so god damned pissed. In fact hillary could have been prez but blacks vited for obama over her in 2008).
>>9117359
Study bantu colonialism please, where they exterminate everything in africa to expand up to south africa.
>>9117628
It's almost as if all humans are shit or something.
>>9117610
> Whites did all this damage to Earth
> Nuh uh.
Typical Trump voter.
>>9117038
Yes, they are very much the same species and the offspring meet the definition of a human being.
See also: the ethnic demographics of Brazil, Homo Sapiens.