Collatz

>>9113180
Post it here first so we can check it for errors.
You wouldn't want to publish a flawed proof, after all.

>>9113213
Can you just reply to my question, im not actually retarded, i just havent done any research in a long time, and when i did i didnt do maths.

>collatz conjecture
No one cares

>>9113180
>I've done some pretty interesting work on the collatz conjecture
Show me your Python script.

>>9113180

Anywhere but here, contact your local university, ask about for an interview and information about publishing. Don't tell what you're publishing, just tell them that you're planning on switching to the field when you're not. Get information inside out and then publish what you have under your own name, fuck everyone else.

>>9113180
Arxiv, if you can't even get it accepted there you're just deluding yourself.

>>9113328
Not that guy, but would you like to see my Matlab script from last semester

>>9113180
As the other anon said, send it to Arxiv right now.
Later you worry about publishing on a journal.

And for some inspiration - https://www.quantamagazine.org/computer-scientists-solve-kadison-singer-problem-20151124/

Good luck.

>>9113421
>>9113344
but isn't publishing in arxiv a death sentence without citations?

>>9113362
Yes.

>>9113816
What do you mean?

>>9113816
y-you didnt cite anyone in your paper?

>>9113816
They come after you and kill your dog.

Hand me the .PDF and I'll make sure it gets published on arxiv.org my god sir.

>>9114330
>god
*good

>>9113816
Your "proof" has no citations?
Man, you are not getting published.
To be honest you almost surely have flaws in your "proof".

Just post the PDF here and be done with it.

>>9113180
If you publish it on Github with a copyright, you at least don't have to worry about people stealing it.

>>9113328
R8 mine pls
[code]
def c(x):
if x%2: c(x*3+1) # Odd numbers.
elif x&x-1: c(x//2) # Even but not a power of two.
else: print("confirm")
[/code]

Just make a blog post or whatever something that has the date attached, why are people always so secretive about this stuff?

Hi declan

>>9113213
You mean so you can steal it, you filthy nigger?

If you actually think someone will steal your idea you are retarded. There's 100% chance that your proof is incorrect and you would be super duper lucky if someone here takes the time to point out one of the many flaws in your paper.

Get a trusted prof. to publish it for you if you really think it holds value, I can't stress "TRUSTED" enough. You wouldn't want him to just steal your idea.

>>9116506
This. We have people like you here every day, OP.

Sorry, I already proved it. Better luck next time!

>>9113180
bump