Em

its the atomic forces that repel the electron you are seeing

...or somethin

>>9111470
I mean... If the electron microscope and if those are atoms. Isn't the ratio of atoms and electrons.. I mean, if those are atoms and that is an electron microscope, wouldn't the atoms be overlapping? I mean... If the electrons are on the orange bits wouldn't that mean the orange bits are in atoms?

>>9111469
Idk probably like the shadow of the atom or something maybe

>>9111469
Nobody knows

File: bigstock-Depressed-Man-154138076-1024x678.jpg (171KB, 1024x678px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1024x678px

>>9111511
im thinking you to death so hard right now

File: foreheads externally.jpg (78KB, 680x965px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 680x965px

>>9111469

>>9111511
The electron microscope is riding the edge of the electron shell that makes up the material. An electron is a point particle, but it exists in a quantum superposition around the atom.

Electrons are apart of atoms. You are seeing the electron shells around the nucleus. Van der waal forces.

If you try and feel the image, the atomic forces in your hand prevent you from coming in physical contact with it. What you may feel as touch are really just atomic forces repelling your hand away. If it's literally impossible to touch the electrons composing the image, then how do we know what it REALLY feels like?

>>9111537
>>9111578
why doesnt the shell cover the top

>>9111469
The way a scanning tunneling microscope works is by measuring the voltage created between the tip of its scanner (a really thin, sharp electrode) and the atoms. Electrons 'tunnel' from the atoms through the medium (usually air or a vacuum) to the tip of the microscope, which processes the information and creates a topological map. (If that doesn't make sense, look up quantum tunneling). The orange gradient in this image represents the electron cloud, which, as other people have stated in this thread, is comprised of point particles which at the same time exist as probabilities because of the electron's wave-particle duality

>>9111590
Yeah so it's not an electron shell and depending on your interpretation of black hole there's a singularity in it. Not an atom.

In electron microscopy you see contrast between things electrons bounce off (atoms) and things they don't bounce off (gaps).

>>9111693
Those electrons would be inside atoms not bouncing off atoms.

File: 2-firsteverhig.jpg (14KB, 500x364px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 500x364px

According to this picture, there lying about the molecule too:

It's all woo-woo bullshit.

>>9111469
I think that is a crystal, not a single atom

>>9111767
Science in general

>>9111959
It's in my head

He who died proved, and he who died unintentionally and unrecognised satisfying you

Current is proportional to the probability of quantum tunneling. Atoms are sites with high probability of containing an electron. Therefore, near atoms are sites with high probability of quantum tunneling.

>>9111979
Muuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum!

It's not a fucking electron microscope image.

>>9111511
But do you mean it?

>>9111762
How so?

>>9112094
http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-microscopic-images-that-will-blow-your-mind/
"We're now so good at seeing molecules that we can make them look like the stick-and-ball models from chemistry class."

File: 02-14-39-images.jpg (24KB, 397x370px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 397x370px

>>9112094
And check out this dodgy dog

File: 02-15-17-images.jpg (10KB, 253x199px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 253x199px

>>9112094
And this dodgy dog

File: 02-18-46-images.jpg (15KB, 443x332px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 443x332px

>>9112094
And the dodgiest dog of them all

>>9112563
I hate this idiot journalist.
>Check out my stamp collection
>*slurps and gurgles from Dawkins cock pumping his throat*
> it's the secret to life.
>DNA implies life
>therefore life implies DNA
>Checkmate christcucks the science is in, DNA is the secert for life.

>the mechanisms allowing for the signification and interpretation of meaning in living systems?
>what does that mean even?
>Ur just what ur DNA wants to!
>the science is settled and I have the pictures to prove it
>see? look at the DNA do.