the laws of physics are subjective

laws of physics aren't subjective. that's why symmetries exist. they're the same no matter where you are because fields extend to infinity.

>>9106265
did you not read my post?

>>9106271
I'd bet he did, and just dismissed it as the nonsense it is. You can't say that reality is "merely an interpretation" and expect people to take that as fact. Science, including physics, is based on replicability; there are no different interpretations of established science.

>>9106264
This is just a what if question, how high are you?

>>9106264
Ugh, god is real and has a real physical effect on the way things go. Physics as we know it is concerned with denying that.

There I said it.

>>9106264
That may be true but I think there will still be some similarity in the laws the two beings derive. Something like how a functor maps isomorphisms to isomorphisms.

>>9106264
Physical laws are human-subjective

We will never know if what we see in physics only applies to humans only or it its universal.

>>9106264
>what is meta-physics?

>>9106264
If you bring up a picture of a tree on your screen, I'll say it's a tree, and you'll say some meme shit like No, it's photons primarily of the green wavelength being emitted by LEDs.
HOWEVER, if you tried to claim that it's photons primarily of the red wavelength, or that there is no EM radiation being emitted from the screen, those are not correct interpretations. If physics were subjective, you could make such claims and they would be correct.
OK you baited me good job.

>>9106264
Post-modernism doesn't work here, go back to /lit/ you mutt