Solution to P=NP

File: cooldog.png (31KB, 213x258px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 213x258px

>>9106040
>the least interesting of all millennium prize problems

>>9106040
>P vs NP
>arxiv
These kinds of papers are posted constantly and are always either not worth mentioning or just plain wrong.

File: IMG_0547.jpg (286KB, 1400x569px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1400x569px

>>9106040
>posting the pdf, not the arxiv page
ask me how I know you're not a scientist

>>9106093
He posted a link to the PDF because that's what's on the front page of /r/programming right now.

>>9106085
Poincare conjecture was posted on archiv, although it was 3 papers and took 3 years to publish.

I do think this PNP solution is bullshit since it brings nothing new to the table, and a solution to a millenial problem needs to bring something that no one has thought of before.

>>9106040
Have any smart people commented on this yet?

>>9106125

Jesus I've just been to that place it's horrible

>>9106133
Fair point. Sometimes breakthroughs do happen. In that case it was Grigori Perelman, who had already shown himself to be capable of such feats. Norbert Blum, on the other hand, while he does have some publications, they don't seem to be particularly notable.

>...was the first who could shown that the gain...
Disregarded

People make such a fuss about it, but it changes nothing really.

P doesn't equal NP because NP is different than P. If they were the same NP would be called P.
QED

>>9106560
you have a brain but you're still a brainlet.
Brainlet Paradox

>>9106040
TFW P=NP
>but SAT complexity in the worst case is O(n^1 000 000 000)