How long until genetic (re)engineering and the use of nanobots are able to replicate scenarios like the one shown in the following video
facial reconstruction etc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1sL_2nhV0c
also fuck everyone and anyone that stands in the way of advancements because of "muh morals much ethics much man in the sky muh chillren in africa"
>>9104664
Fucking gore warning dude.
Genetic engineering is incapable of soing such things. Nanobots capable of doing that are far off.
>>9104664
Let me guess. Undergrad? Second rate college? Both?
Nobody with a detailed and well-rounded knowledge of medicine and biology talks about "nanobots."
>>9104664
this screams underage or troll, not sure which
>nanobots
meme
>genetic engineering
is a technique which can be used for many things, mainly in altering genes in cell cultures or tissues to get them to express certain proteins or knock them out. Has nothing to do with getting cells to grow different tissues instantaneously at exactly the same place where the facial damage was as shown in that film.
If such a thing is ever possible (not within our lifetimes if we're talking about brain printing), it will utilise a combination of scientific tools. This field is called tissue engineering as of now, and in its human application doesn't involve magical in vivo printing of compex facial tissue structures, but organ printing for surgical transplantation/grafts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tissue_engineering