Why can't

>>9102139
Because of sexism.

>>9102139
>Why can't women get into STEM

They have no problems getting into it when they want to. As a statistical group, they broadly don't care about STEM.

File: 1460577698432.png (71KB, 438x369px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 438x369px

>>9102139
because they fail calc I and don't want to re-learn algebra, thereafter majoring in something without an actual math requirement. it's the same reason people don't go in to STEM in general; women just tend to be more anxious and self-critical in the face of failure on average.

i've met plenty of smart women who are in STEM at my uni and over time i think it will all even out. there are lots of initiatives to get women in to science, which, will eventually not be needed. in any case, i think the people who screech autistically about "needing more womyn in STEM" are a little ridiculous. anyone who is a legitimate "sexist" will never be swayed by that kind of reasoning or approach.

as a grille in stem

can a hot stem boy just become my fuccbuddy already?

it'd be a lot easier to learn this junk if i had sumone to bang it out w/

so annoys to brush off communication majors.

>>9102272

>grill
>STEM
Biology doesn't count.