Which interpretation of QM is correct? And consequently, which

>>9101425
We don't know which one is correct, and heat death seems the most likely but we still have a lot to learn before we know anything like that for sure

>>9101425
As you can understand from the word "interpretation", the answer is not clear, and it might never be. Right now, which interpretation you choose to accept depends on your personal views.
Which principles are important to you in a theory - determinism? realism? locality? non-contextuality? Do you want the theory to be as simple as possible? (and what exactly do YOU count as simple?)
Answer these questions and you've pretty much chosen your leading interpretation.

>>9101470
I want to know which theory gives the most accurate description of the real world.

>>9101425
The "it's a cosmic prank" interpretation.

>>9101493
The maths is the same for all of them more or less, if any one of them made some prediction different from the others it would have been tested and we wouldn't be talking about it, like for local hidden variable theories

Tbh the axioms of QM are probably incorrect (dont know the correction) since they treat time completely different than space (((implying spacetime is a valid notion and not just what VERY large observers see)))