Does anyone else find it kinda strange to study from ebooks?

File: evince.webm (1MB, 1098x1005px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1098x1005px

>>9095055
evince

I guess you can not name bookmarks, and the file has to be saved as a new pdf

safer and better than adobe though

my only issues with ebooks is that I worry somebody might have changed small details in it just to troll

>>9095055
Never highlight a book. It's the most barbaric thing to do.

>>9095204

Bullshit. If you want to get the most out of a book marking words and making notes ist necessary.

File: file.png (490KB, 640x459px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 640x459px

Sounds like you need a Samsung® Galaxy® Tab!

>>9095055

I know what you mean. Have you tried a tablet, with a stylus? I had a friend at uni who used to annotate lecture notes on that and it seemed like a good way to get the best of both worlds.

>>9095055
The only problem with e books is you can't quickly turn back to a previous page without it being annoying. PDF readers should really take care of that. It's amazing how lazy developers are.

My main concern with reading stuff on a screen is the possible strain on the eyes, but when I dim the screen it actually seems like my eyes are more strained because things aren't as clear. Is it better to not dim the screen then? I guess when you think about it, it makes sense. Just like how people tell you to read with proper lighting when it comes to reading physical books.

>>9095055
I'd buy ebooks if the quality for equations and images wasn't shit even for Kindle editions of a book.

Plus most of the important books have no real electronic edition, just a poorly scanned version and that sucks.

Physics and math texts are better when you have the physical book itself.

If you are reading a non /sci/ related or some book which doesn't rely heavily on diagrams or equations, it's fine, I'd say.

>>9095204
>A library book?
I agree

>A personal book?
Its stupid not to add your own notes and markings.