Collatz Conjecture

>>9086751
Lol no, nerd

>>9086751
>link
http://google.com/

its pretty cool, you can find not only advancements on the collatz conjecture but pretty much anything ever

>>9086751
Why do you think it's called conjecture, OP.

perhaps one day quantum machine learning algorithms will solve it

>>9086777
great post
even better digits

Up to about 60 million, the maximum sequence length below a number x behaves as
[eqn]\pi^{e+1}*x^{\pi-3}[/eqn]
Above that it behaves differently, but I can't remember the formula. I think it had e^4 in it

>>9089163
found it again: Above 60 million it behaves like
[eqn]e^4*\ln{x}[/eqn]