How could it be proved?

File: IMG_0109.jpg (45KB, 636x424px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 636x424px

Figure this out

>>9086237
Space-time geometry. Best way to understand that, I think, is in quantum gravitational fields. Gravity is fundamentally tied to space, as seen in general relativity. So in order to understand space, we must understand gravity. Quantum gravity is particularly interesting for this subject because at such a small scale, we can analyze the effects of gravity. Conversely we could relate this to where we stand in the universe, and ultimately attempt to describe spacetime geometry. The geometry of spacetime and its relation to gravity could uncover if it is possible to connect two distant points in space with an infinite gravitational well.

>>9086237
Idk why I'm typing all this out honestly, I have three degrees: astrophysics, physics, and mathematics.

>>9086714
Ok the. you'll understand that we have 3-4 parts to an equation.
>Space
>Time
>Gravity
>Maybe something else seeing as its 4 dimensions and all????
We sorta know the effects these have on each other, except for time. How does time effect gravity and space?

>>9086238
A

But in the Gmod simulation, they had portal attraction turned on. This "sucked" the cube up and into the orange portal, resulting in something that looked like B

But, again, the answer is A, because the cube itself had no momentum, so no momentum was conserved.

t. Glad0s

>>9086711
so what are we relying on as a signature for 4th dimensional location? Planck lengths are the smallest unit, so any infinite gravity well would just be protomatter at planck length distance from each other. In order for there to be an extra dimension, there would have to be more stuff between the planck lenghts. I'm just some passerby, post-highschool graduate. I don't know shit. But this just reminds me of looking through a fractal, and claiming that one of the repetitions is in fact the initial fractal, and it isn't! Even if it looks the same.

>>9086711
I meant, how could we test the Einstein-Rosen Bridge, empirically.
What kind of experiment could show that this phenomenon is real?

>>9086788
In real life physics it would be B (The cube is exiting a stationary portal with relative velocity to said portal. Therefore momentum). In portal game physics it would be A.

>>9087401
Just by doing it. I don't think it can be attempted on a miniature scale.