Thread replies: 2
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: 1501611261697.jpg (42KB, 433x577px) Image search:
[Google]
42KB, 433x577px
Why do the same people who shit on other people for being less intelligent than themselves deny that IQ has any heritable genetic components? Why would you care about anyone's intelligence if you could just magically increase it by changing your environment? Why do these same people insist that women are smarter than men, while denying that genes play any role in intelligence?
How can people who do think that IQ has heritable genetic components deny that different genetically isolated populations have different mean IQ's and different standard deviations in the normal distributions of their IQ's?
Why do people with internet access attack the measurement of intelligence by IQ when it has over 100 years of psychometric data and refinement behind it?
Why do people think that the Flynn Effect, which is a phenotypic IQ increase, will result in a closing between the IQ gaps of genetically isolated populations?
How can people deny that some genetically isolated populations are smarter than others when a certain small genetically isolated population that practiced endogamy for centuries has won about 22% of all Nobel prizes?
Why are you shitposting on /sci/ on a weekday?
When did Reddit spacing become so sexy?
>>
File: brainevo.png (217KB, 1389x1668px) Image search:
[Google]
217KB, 1389x1668px
In a world gone topsy-turvy science won't rest until it proves we're all identical blank slates and >>>/pol/ is a champion of the truth (except for that 22% part).
Intelligence is what makes us human so while we're all human some are more human than others and that's the bit that upsets people.
Thread posts: 2
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2