What does /sci/ think of Freud?

>>9073322
Another retard playing scientist.
/thread

>>9073364
Well Popper based his notion of pseudoscience on him, so....

What a son of a goat.

freud more like fraud

>>9073322
greatest psycho of the past century he saved me a lot !
not even kidding

>>9073364
>>9073424
>>9073429
>>9073447
go to bed, Carl Jung

>>9073482
Typical Fi argument!

>>9073482
Another fraud

He's got some hilarious theories. 9/10 in my books

Well he obviously didn't get everything right, but he did almost singlehandedly found the study of psychology and the discovery of the unconscious was pretty genius and revolutionary at that time, so one does have to give him credit for that. Also psychoanalytic therapy still is more effective in treating some diseases such as depression than the more """scientific""" cognitive behavioral therapy, so theres that. [spoiler]I like Jung more tho[/spoiler]

>>9073493
untrue

>>9073322
Let's say at least he tried.

>>9073493
heonly founded psychoanalysis. psychology has a big history during freuds time without him. there are quite a few big psychologists who still get cited today by more respectable fields of psychology and there were many movements that happened during his time in psychology; functionalism, structuralism, gestalt. germany was a hot bed at the time.

>>9073493

also, citation?

>>9073485
>I am an expert in Jungian psychology because I discovered MBTI
Pathetic.

>>9073322
It wasn't even scientifically sound back then, and his theories are to incoherent to be called philosophy.