>"Let me guess: XXXX, amirite????"
What fallacy is it when someone dismisses an argument just because it was used too much or by too many people (even if it never was properly debunked)?
Its not a fallacy, they just dont want to talk to you if you say things like that. Or they want to demonstrate how well versed they are in the topic.
Fucking autists.
>>9073260
It's an ad populum fallacy, but negated.
Normally it's "a lot of people believe it so it's true" but in this case it's "a lot of people believe it so it's false".
>>9073260
Could be inversed argumentum ad nauseam
>>9073260
how about you give the actual scenario you cheeto fingered faggot
>>9073260
Could be the genetic fallacy, but your questions too vague.
It is poisoning the well, except the pejorative introduction is implied.