Multiverse General

Bubbles are inefficient at taking up space the universe is a cube

>>9072061
>Bubbles are inefficient at taking up space the universe is a cube
space from what? where are the multiple universes located?

>>9071711

There is no way to know, even in theory.

>>9072061
Wasn't a sphere the geometrical form of minimal energy possible? Wouldn't that imply that the universe is actually a sphere and not any other geometrical form?

>>9071711
If a multiverse existed, our universe should be much much smaller than it is. So probably it doesn't exist, unless someone purposely created one.

>>9072291
>If a multiverse existed, our universe should be much much smaller than it is
Why?

>>9072321
Because it's insanely unlikely for our entropy to be as low as it is. Roger Penrose calculated that it occurring by chance is 1:10^10^123 while the chance of our solar system forming by a random collision of particles is 1:10^10^60. So there would be 10^10^63 solar system universes with intelligent life on it before a universe as big as puts would occur. And that's ignoring all the star cluster sized universes, or super cluster, or galaxy or galactic cluster that we statistically should be observing in a multiverse scenario.

>>9072117
If there's something like surface tension yeah. Implies universes would become spherical over time.

What's the chance of other universes being just other solar systems?
As if we can physically see other universes because outer space isn't what we think it is.

>>9072613
>tfw universes are just the atoms of Gods coffee table.

>>9071711
It literally doesn't matter. You can't perform any test or experiment to show fi they are there or not. Belief in them hovers somewhere between philosophy and religion.

>>9072061
>universe is a cube

You're thinking of time, which is cubic.

A multiverse splits off every time there is a square that must be square rooted.

a = integral blah blah forces other particles
v' = v + a t
x' = x + v t

or maybe the universe goes like


a = integral blah blah forces other particles
x' = x + v t + 1/2 a t^2

And then a particle exceeds the speed of light and the front side of it goes back in time or the time component of something else needs to be determined from the other variables and pop there you have another multiberse splitting off from the result of going back in time somehow and creating an alternate happenstgance of events.

>>9072329
https://youtu.be/ew_cNONhhKI?t=44m

>>9074039
1. Sean Carol is an idiot about all things philosophical. He has an axe to grind which clouds his reasoning skills when the term "God" comes up.
2. That's the argument I made. We could have a very high Entropy (leading to a small universe) but we don't. So it really discounts the idea of a multiverse, since there are so many other potentially life sustaining universes that we should be seeing (particularly if you think the concept of Boltzman Brains carries any weight).