Newton Vs. Leibnitz
Which side are you on /sci/ ?
>>9067580
Newton
Fuck those two cuck's unrigorous calculus approach. Bolzano and Weierstraß.
Newton. Autism senpai represent.
>>9067580
newton's notation is vastly inferior to leibniz's.
the two primary notation styles i use is leibniz and Lagrange's.
>>9067606
>hurr we need to prove that if you draw a line through a line they intersect
"real" "analysis" is the ultimate bikeshedding
those "cucks" understood the power of intuition and Newton in particular laid out the system of the world with his creation
>>9067580
whichever one had monads
>>9067587
>>9067607
>>9067615
I wonder who could be behind these posts
>>9067580
Seki Takakazu.
>In comparison with European mathematics, Seki's first manuscript was as early as Leibniz's first commentary on the subject, which treated only up to the 3X3 case. This subject was forgotten in the West until Gabriel Cramer in 1750 was driven to it by the same motivations.
>>9068292
>This subject was forgotten in the West
Was it even known in the West?
>>9068300
Does that make it any less valid?
Europeans aren't the only race with a mathematical ability.
Leibnitz
He was a real nigga. Newton was a little bitch.
>>9068304
I wasn't suggesting it didn't make it valid, calm down. You said it had been forgotten in the West, so I was asking if people in the West had access to his work. If you assert something is forgotten somewhere, you are presupposing it was known there, so I'm just asking out of curiosity.
>>9067580
Leibniz. But then again I live in Altdorf, so I'm kinda biased.
>>9067580
Newton is a meme. Only in the US he has a cult.