but i don't understand this clip
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mWtWz_aGyk
>>9065257
>Implying the general population is useful.
They're nothing but peasants.
Americans import shit ton of people from Asia to do research in the USA. Everyone knows that Murricans themselves are dumb as rocks.
That guy probably spent 3+ hours searching through a highly populated area trying to find a couple people that are stupid enough to make his clip.
Best proof that intelligence isn't heritable.
>smart people come to usa to find better possibilities
>give birth to dumb kids
>usa have to continually import smart people from other countries to stay relevant
>>9065257
What if they interviewed hundreds of people and only showed the responses of the idiots.
Suppose you, as the person being fed statistical data, have a set standard for what constitutes a "good sampling" (usually a big sample size that is sufficiently stratified to cover all relevant demographics)
Suppose your standard tells you that your favorite big number, N, is a large enough sample.
Now, me, knowing your standard, could get a sample of size 100*N, then cherry-pick from all subsets of that large sample that both meet your sampling requirement and also align with my agenda (simple optimization problem). Then I could pretend this optimally cherry-picked subset was my "real" sampling.
>>9065267
>They're nothing but peasants.
actually they are the tax base that supports the private military of the multi-national corporations, i.e., the US military
>>9065549
>>9065257
The eternal americucks, no wonder why trump won.
>>9065257
USA has some of the best learning centers of the world.
But not for everyone, the rest of the people get a mediocre education, yes, even WASPs.
Also, those videos ask about 2,000 people and just put together the 20 most idiotic they found to build a straw man.