What field is appropriate for understanding the fundamentals

>What field
The answer lies in a rejection of the question. You must be a generalist and avoid hyperspecialization, and compartmentalization. Try to resolve the underlying absolutes everything is composed of and the connections between them.

>>9060814
Ontology

Astrology

>>9060827
yes but i need to start somewhere, it would also be great if i could make a living somehow

>>9060814
can you specify what you mean by fundamentals of existence?

>>9060880
I have this belief that the world is very simple, and that the world build up like a tree in mathematics from a single very simple point, where paradoxes play a central role and you will have to just "accept" one or two things, but from those things the whole existence develop in abstraction layers, where each layer creates new rules out of only one or two fundamental rules, it is pretty hard to explain it in text without writing a novel. What am i doing here? Logic? Math? I just don't know what to it really is

shameless self bump

>>9060891
see
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-ontology/

>>9060891

So you like reductionism. Mathematical logic and fundamental particle physics should be right up your alley.

>>9060891
This >>9061291
And mereology

Bump for interest

>>9061291
>>9061405
>>9061442
thank you all very much!

>>9060814
>What field is appropriate for understanding the fundamentals of existence?
[math]\mathbb R[/math] obviously...