Why is there so much matter and no antimatter?
is it because infinity is not symmetric about the origin?
Originally the Universe had literally a fucking billion times more matter than it orignally does. In the Big Bang 99.9999999% of all matter was destroyed by anti-matter. What exists today is the 0.00000001% that wasn't.
>>9058561
What I mean to say is there "once upon a time" there was as much matter as anti-matter, but it was all annihilated by normal matter since everything was so compact and dense in the very beginning.
>>9058561
I know this is the story but why do people believe it?
>there should be as much matter as antimatter
>there isn't
>who cares though this is astronomy not science
>maybe the universe made a rounding error when it was annihilating itself
>let's say the universe used to be really big so the error looks really small
Shouldn't they come up with theory for matter-only universes?
>>9058633
Do you even know what the fuck you are talking about? Try to define matter, you'll see how fucking stupid you are being.
>>9058643
matter = stuff that annihilates with its antimatter in perfect 1:1 conservation law ratios.
>>9058652
holy fuck why are there so many brainlets on /sci/
>>9058643
Mmm, trapped energy?
>>9058518
It's all on the other side of the universe
>>9058945
they come for the science and stay for the funny frog maymays
>>9058945
ITT: matter doesn't annihilate with antimatter
This makes the non-existence of antimatter an even bigger problem.
>matter and antimatter eliminate each other
>universe has existed for billions of years
And you are telling me it has reached an equilibrium? colour me shocked. we may never know the answer anon.
>>9059084
No if it was a dynamic process we'd see radiation at annihilation energies everywhere but we don't.
The universe was created with no antimatter.
>>9059065
Batter :------DD XD