in your opinion?
>>9058220
For me it was that analysts were finally able to prove the lower bound [math] 1 + 1 \geq 2 [/math]
either weil conjectures or taniyami-shimura
>>9058220
For me it was the important jasmine suse conjecture because of its philosophical implications and also kicking off the entire field of jasmine theory.
probably the incompleteness theorems if were being objective here
>>9058220
illegal primes
>>9058296
LEGALIZE MATHS
>You're in the club and this guy slaps your girl's ass
>>9058227
>Putting two apples on a table creates the potentiality of more apple
The Banach-Tarski paradox because it clearly shows who is a total brainlet cuck and who understands intuitive results.
>>9058220
Probably not the most prolific, but I believe that the most impactful is Shannon.
>>9058276
This. The rest isn't close. It also puts Gödel on the shortlist for greatest 20th century mathematician.
The nature of the statements is so impactful upon both math and philosophy and inquiry in general, that it is childish for a detractor to refute the above along the lines of "it's not math (it is); he wasn't a mathematician (he was, he proved theorems by pushing symbols around on the paper).
>topologically blocks your path
>>9058376
>The Banach-Tarski paradox
Call me a total brainlet cuck and shove those intuitive results far back up your ass.
That shit makes no sense
>>9058276
/thread
Any other result doesn't even come close.
>>9058886
and then the theorem turned out to be mostly irrelevant so mathematicians stopped caring about mathematical logic
Not pure math but Schrödinger equation has to be up there.
>>9058360
>nice elliptic curves babe, wanna see mine?
>>9058890
how is it irrelevant
Topos and incompleteness theorem
>>9058890
Harvey Friedman disagrees
>>9058371
>>9058220
definitely the incompleteness theorem
>>9058220
You know it's true.
>>9058296
Falta el liquido verde