Gravity

>know
>quantum

>>9046884
Not much of anything if you don't look at untested QG theories.

>>9046884
>Gravity
>In quantum mechanics
Literally nothing, that's like the biggest issue people are having right now, nobody had been able to integrate quantum physics and gravity together

Gravity is the product of thermodynamics in some infinite dimensional vector space of which the 3D world is the image of.

QM is a framework within the broader set of rules mentioned above that attempts to control how things work, like a forced meme.

One paradigm controls the other but not the other way around, so there is no way to explain how gravity works in the framework of QM, but there is a way to explain QM within the broader framework.

The "broader framework" is related to morality on an absolute level, something which physics as we know it tries to deny the existence of and therefore doesn't mention.

File: 76vQo.gif (2MB, 388x218px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 388x218px

Gravity is what causes uncertainty. Gravitational waves mediate the gravitational force between objects and as they move the wave energy changes causing a...I've said too much

mass=0
spin=2

>>9046884
Shitty film.

Unrealistic
Had more to do with micro-gravity
Somewhat decent cast but poor utilization
Had no real impact when it came to story.

>>9046884
Same as all the others. Spacetime is some kind of field / 4dimensional body of liquid/field/fabric. The greater forces (strong/weak nuclear and electromagnetic) do their own particular things but fundamentally behave in the same way, and the Higgs field being the odd man out in that it appears to transcend dimensions more easily and is somehow weakened by how it's spread out in that sense.

As it is, gravity is a byproduct of this field being affected by mass, like a magic body of water that can only be touched by a particular 'thing'; the higgs boson.

>>9047139
Far too much

>>9047025
Your comment confused me at first but now I'm 100% convinced that you just filled out a pop sci themed mad lib and copied it here

Steven Hawking has a book on this, its called a brief history of time.

gravitons

>>9049122
It confused you because you are stupid.

To everyone else:

Let me use computers as an anology: there is no way to explain how hardware works if you only know a programming language but not how the hardware it runs on works (monkeys could be behind it for all you know), but it is entirely possible to explain how software works on top of hardware.

QM is actually something rather sinister that is used to further a certain agenda: to trick you into thinking people are gods and vice versa. That is what "wave particle duality is", a wave permeates all of space, and you a particle are something localized. It is just like in Greek mythology how the spirits are anthromorphized as though they were human beings. You wish to create something that has the characteristics of both a particle and a wave, so the particle acts as though it were a wave, by making it look like a Gaussian, which is still a Gaussian under Fourier transform. The uncertainty principle is there so that the wavefunction is forced to look like a Gaussian in both position and momentum space.

File: facepalm.jpg (6KB, 220x229px)

6KB, 220x229px

>>9047025

>>9047025
>One paradigm controls the other but not the other way around, so there is no way to explain how gravity works in the framework of QM, but there is a way to explain QM within the broader framework.
That's because the actions of gravity become bigger, the further the wave has to spread.
So, it would change wavelength and therefore behaviour.

>>9048959
>actual incoherent nonsense with sci fi words interspersed
Yep definitely mad libs

>>9046884
We suspect that it may be mediated by a boson called the graviton, that propagates at c and is a spin-2 (tensor) boson. The only realistic place we could ever study these particles is near a (pair) of black holes, or possibly neutron stars. on the scale of quantum physics, gravitons are so few and so weak that the uncertainty of spacetime itself (like the "resolution" of the universe) completely obscures them. This means that under regular circumstances, they essentially don't exist in any meaningful way. This unfortunately means we can't experiment with them.

When you think of interactions in QM, you can think of a variable as being an eigenstate, which takes the form of a 1st order tensor. For gravity, it is defined by a 2nd order tensor (the energy-momentum tensor) and so the force mediator must be a tensor boson. But as I alluded to before, it takes vast amounts of mass/density/pressure and fluxed thereof to "activate" the energy-momentum tensor. This simply can't be achieved for single subatomic particles.

The upshot is: we have a lot of theory but no real way to test it.

>>9049328
>QM implies that people are gods
ZZoooooooowwwweeeeeeemama

>>9046884
It's emergent and not fundamental

>>9046884
Here you go OP. This will help you understand gravity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pb69HENUZs8

Gravity is not mass oriented. It does not bend anything.

>>9049328
Are you ok?