>science is the belief

Well, isn't anything that isn't math rooted in some underlying belief or assumption?

>>9045236
>mathematical axioms
>not a belief

>>9045236
The belief needs to be TESTED via a METHOD, then it becomes science.

>>9045229
>solving problems
>science

No that's engineering.

>>9045242
>Problem, how does the universe behaves
>solution science
Wow really made me think

>>9045239
>The belief needs to be TESTED via a METHOD, then it becomes science.
How do you know this?

>>9045242
What is beauty?

>>9045257
Because then it's just philosophy.

>>9045229
>I don't believe in science
>I merely follow and trust the scientific method
There are autistic sperglords who routinely perform such kinds of mental gymnastics.

>>9045229
>science is the spectrum*

>>9045239
>muh scientific method
get out

File: ccdbf8ee6f2ecda65c993ee86320ecc06b98b50e7615c1a194fce95930d496af.jpg (38KB, 727x480px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 727x480px

>>9045239
>he believes in induction

File: 220px-Allan_Ramsay_-_David_Hume,_1711_-_1776._Historian_and_philosopher_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg (13KB, 220x262px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 220x262px

>>9045463
>mfw

File: glaeserphoto4.jpg (17KB, 288x334px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 288x334px

>>9045463
I know some people on /sci/ meme about infinite sets not being real cause of Wildburger, but are we now doubting induction too? It works for finite sets if you happen to think 2^1000 is the biggest number or whatever

>>9045866
mathematical induction is deductive reasoning

>>9045265
Recursion

>>9045239
Bruh if you still don't see how scientific theories are entirely philosophical you might have no hope

>>9045239
Isn't the entire point of axioms that you can't test them. If you could test them they'd be theorems.