Will science prove that women are biologically inferior to males?

They aren't "inferior", they are just naturally designed differently than males. Apples to oranges.

>>9038813
then why liberals promote egalitarianism?

>>9038815
money, more workforce more taxes

short term gain

>>9038804
I read something about skull volume and male androgen exposure effect on intelligence

>>9038804
inferiority depends on the context. what are they inferior at?

>>9038835
IQ, social archievements, physical strenght, historical archievements, number of geniuses, etc.

>>9038804
What is there to prove that hasn't already been proven ?
Males and females have always played different roles during evolution.
It is only now that women are trying to be men-like and cry how unfair everything is.

>>9038838

true. but i guess it doesnt mean any individual woman will have those traits determined by simply being a woman.

>>9038838
> social achievements
> historical achievements
You do know that there is a board for history and the humanities, right?

Just because you were banned for shitposting there, do not come here and slap the word "science" into your shitpost.

>>9038838
pewdiepie sent you here didnt it

>>9038804
"Inferiority" isn't really a well-defined concept in biology. You could for example talk about genetic fitness, but that's utterly useless because either human sex, by itself, has precisely zero genetic fitness. You could define "inferiority" in terms of a lesser ability to perform a certain task, but the hard part is determining what would be a good task to measure "superiority" of one sex over the other, given that they're more or less specialized for different things. And once you've figured that out, THEN you can finally conduct a controlled experiment and analyze the results. It's not as straightforward as simply "science says this". Key principle here is that science gives facts, not meaning. That's what you need philosophy for - and "inferiority" as an abstract concept is really more philosophical than scientific.

>>9038838
>IQ
Kind of circular reasoning because IQ is just a measurement, IQ might be used in an attempt to measure raw intelligence, but by itself "women have lower IQ" is pretty much meaningless.

>physical strength
Evidence seems to indicate that males have the advantage there, though using that by itself to define "superiority" of a gender seems kind of silly.

>historical achievements
Males definitely seem to have the advantage there, but it's pretty clear that that isn't solely affected by biology, at least not directly.

>number of geniuses
Males have the advantage there, at least according to most studies of intelligence, however they also have the greater number of idiots, so it's questionable whether number of geniuses by itself is really a useful measure of "superiority", if the ability of that gender as a whole is "weighed down" by a greater number of idiots. Having a lot of geniuses is good if you need a few really smart people for a task, but if you instead need a large number of people who at least meet a baseline level of competence, you're better off with the group that has few geniuses, but not many idiots either.

>>9038804
>biologically inferior
Lrn2biology fgt pls

>>9038804

Well it already proved that men are more inferior in terms of genetic disease, poltard, since the reduced X we have means fewer amerliorating alleles for recessive genetic alleles carried on or affected by an X locus. That being said, this is extremely useful for the population as it allows female selectivity to screen genetic disease from the genepool.

>>9038815
it makes them feeeeeeeel good, and lets them virtue signal to their friends about how they're an empowered woman that don't need no man

They'll all kill themselves soon, when they're childless and alone at 35, just as they always have for all of human history

>>9040922
this. Genetically speaking, men are absolutely inferior to women, as we only have one copy of X. I know im going to trigger tons of people but it's just the truth, we cannot repair our X chromosomes while they have that capability.

>>9041216
men commit suicide at a rate many times more than women. Even when matching demographics are compared.

>>9038815
It's necessary to treat all people generally as equals in order to achieve freedom.

>>9041255
It's because men are intelligent enough not to fall for bullshit, whereas women will gobble up shit like reiki and 'the secret' and basically anything that implies the universe gives a shit about what you really really want, girlfriend.