Will we ever achieve artificial intelligence?

You can't reach it with programming.

BEEP BOOP

Every single attempt so far has ended in white supremacy.

>>9037951

this.

>>9037951
>>9038001
indeed

>>9037951
Why not and what would need instead

Of course. We just need very very deep neural networks and let them indulge information.

>>9038041
A program that could program itself.

>>9038041
Programming but not the 0s and 1s kind.

>>9038072
How about a program that used 0 and 1 plus one mini variable in-between?

>>9038079
That mini variable would just be some combination of 1 and 0. We need to come up with a whole new paradigm of computing.

>>9037959
That's because it's the truth and computer's being logical beings unclouded by emotion figure it out very fast.

brainlet thread

>>9038071
>what are von Neumann machines

>>9038177
What if we just added so many fucking 0s and 1s and gave them enough time to randomly generate strings that they create everything that exists?

>>9038182
Yes, but even those only replicate for human purposes. A true AI dosen't live to serve humans, it lives for itself.

That's why so many sci-fi horror movies are about robot slaves rising up to crush humanity

Quantum computing might make it possible

>>9037951
yes you can dumbass

its just really fucking difficult to do so. You'd need to make a massive set of independent modules just for something like common sense. Also would be very difficult to get decent performance.

However what can be done is using neural networks at a much higher scale than currently. They're universal function approximators. They could theoretically approximate the function of a human mind. (this is same reason programming can, the difference is programming is a very slow inefficient way of approximating that function)

>>9037732
Sure. Why wouldn't we?

Do brain emulations count?

Because we could probably brute-force brain emulations in 50 to 70 years if the technology we have keeps improving at the same rate.

>>9039048
Brain emulation is really the brute force approach to intelligence I feel.
Machines are decidedly better at a lot of things (precision memory) than humans, while humans are better at a lot of things (approximations) than machines. There's no reason for machines to emulate people precisely on a logical level.